Peaces@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoAI learned from their work. Now they want compensation.wapo.stexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1180arrow-down1external-linkAI learned from their work. Now they want compensation.wapo.stPeaces@infosec.pub to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square51fedilinkfile-text
A rising movement of artists and authors are suing tech companies for training AI on their work without credit or payment
minus-squareImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down7·1 year agoSo you can walk into an art museum, look at a Rembrant, a Da Vinci, and a Carlo, go home to a canvas, and jot up a fusion of the three? Wow. You’re good.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI mean… Yeah. I can do that. It’s not gonna be very good, but I can do it.
minus-squaregoetzit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoI can’t just go home and create an AI that can create art either, clearly i was simplifying things for my example.
minus-squareImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down7·1 year agoI suggest you look up the meaning of a “straw man” fallacy and form an opinion on the idea.
minus-squareNir@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoYour condescension isn’t adding to the conversation.
minus-squareImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·1 year agoI think you’re missing my point entirely. Dangerously simplifying a non-simple issue is putting you in the category of “My kid could do that.”
minus-squareNir@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI’m not addressing any points, I’m just saying that people don’t tend to listen to rude comments. Even your reply to me is condescending. Tone matters if you want to have a productive conversation.
minus-squareImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoWhat part of your comment was not condescending?
So you can walk into an art museum, look at a Rembrant, a Da Vinci, and a Carlo, go home to a canvas, and jot up a fusion of the three?
Wow. You’re good.
I mean… Yeah. I can do that.
It’s not gonna be very good, but I can do it.
I can’t just go home and create an AI that can create art either, clearly i was simplifying things for my example.
I suggest you look up the meaning of a “straw man” fallacy and form an opinion on the idea.
Your condescension isn’t adding to the conversation.
I think you’re missing my point entirely. Dangerously simplifying a non-simple issue is putting you in the category of “My kid could do that.”
I’m not addressing any points, I’m just saying that people don’t tend to listen to rude comments.
Even your reply to me is condescending. Tone matters if you want to have a productive conversation.
What part of your comment was not condescending?