• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I was more engaged by this than the Witcher 3. I’m not saying it’s better, I’m just saying it was engaging.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I wouldn’t even say it was good.

        It was aggressively mid.

        I own it, I’ve played it through. I don’t think I’ll ever pick it up ever again. I’ll get this sequel when it’s under $10.

        • EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It could have been good if all the planets were actually playable.

          It felt like half a game, and another six months to bake would have probably turned it into a great game with some replayability. Put a gun to my head, and I couldn’t tell you the plot, but I remember both “some” fun, and a lot of frustration of how short it was.

    • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I really wanted to like it, but just couldn’t get into it. It was completely forgettable for me, and I like nearly every game that has a sci-fi setting. My bar is very low for that genre, but this one was not engaging at all for me.