5·
1 year agodeleted by creator
DPRK_Chopra [comrade/them]
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 13th, 2022
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
2·1 year agoFor sure, no worries. I had the same questions as you when reading it. Fwiw, the paper is really kind of sloppy. I think it’s maybe a case of poor students not wanting to pay for GPT-4? Maybe they’ll clean it up and respond to some of the criticisms when it comes out of draft, but it doesn’t seem like very rigorous scholarship to me.
I’m talking about the models and how they’re written about in the literature. I don’t care how OpenAI brands their products.
From the paper itself:
For the additional 2000 SO questions, ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo API is used.
ChatGPT is 3.5, 4 is just called GPT4
deleted by creator