• 0 Posts
  • 229 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 6th, 2023

help-circle
    1. I’m claiming that it isn’t category-logic that is valid, it is degree-in-a-spectrum logic that is valid.

    Believing that only Good™ & Bad™ are the only possible-conditions is false-dichotomy, false-framing.

    1 is openly-evil, the other … is less evil, & works hard at hiding all the evil it does, from white eyes.

    1. Israel holds it is Western, & treated as Western, in alignment, so it doesn’t matter if someone holds that “because of what they do, therefore they aren’t Western”: their centrality in the US’s military & international policy makes it Western in a functional sense.

    2. Representative-republic ISN’T, & never was, democracy, & the electoral-college made the US 2-times-removed from democracy, not 1-times-removed, as a normal representative-republic was.

    Trump-dictatorship just finishes converting it to an ideology-archy, is all.

    It’ll take 7-8y for Trump to personality-convert to not-even-understanding-how-any-other-could-be-valid DarkHexad personality,

    & then another 7-8y cycle for that personality’s dictatorship to BUTCHER the US of A, as the Confederate reverse-takeover enforces its race-±religion totalitarianism.

    He promised his followers they wouldn’t have to vote anymore, & that is a promise I trust him to fulfil.

    You identified very-few assassinations, but I linked to a whole damn table-listing of the US’s assassinations…

    IF that doesn’t count, because you’ve already made-up your mind, that isn’t Empiricism, that is ideology/prejudice/“religion”/programming/Kahneman1-mind, & I’m fine with that being your religion: it is many people’s religion, & you’ve total constitutional right to your ideology/prejudice/religion/programming/Kahneman1-mind, as all Westerners do, it seems…

    ( the problem is wrong-granularity: Nazism can be called a “religion” & there’s no logically-valid falsification of that.

    Instead of guaranteeing the constitutional right to any ideology/prejudice/religion/programming/Kahneman1-mind, the right needs to be much more precise, DISallowing DarkHexad principles or embodiements from being any guaranteed-right.

    But that would violate the current “entitlement” to evil as a religion, wouldn’t it? )

    Our view is whitewashed!

    Holding that an acceptably-whitewashed view “proves” that our side isn’t evil … that hasn’t upright-spine in it, you know?

    Here is a book I invested-in years ago, in order to discover if there was ANY truth to the “my whole view is whitewashed” position, & I figured that if I could understand 1 section of the book’s context rigorously-enough ( based on my knowledge of outside-evidence, stuff NOT in the book ), THEN I’d be able to judge whether the book was all conspiracist-delusion XOR whether it was proving that at-least a significant-percentage of what it was saying was … proving my belief to be what was baseless…

    https://www.amazon.com/Hidden-History-Conspiracies-Cover-Ups-American-ebook/dp/B01KEL9Z82/

    The section I dug-into was the systematic-assassination of biology researchers…

    From what I could tell, it checked-out.

    I never read any more of that book, because it’s too damn depressing.

    So, when it takes mere-seconds to find, online, evidence of THOUSANDS of falsely-labelled EKIA “Enemy Killed In Action”, as it was Obama’s S.O.P. to simply label ALL who US bombing butchered “EKIA”, ignoring their being just families who lived there…

    then the “evil XOR not-evil” false-dichotomy grates on my blood with its false-framing.

    No matter.

    Perhaps you hold that the evil the US does to its own not-have populations doesn’t count in G-D’s eye, either…

    Most whites don’t…

    In the 1st while of the BLM uprising there were 5 open lynchings in the Deep South, but … of course, … the police called all those hangings “suicide”, same as in the old days…

    ( read the Black news, when such events are happening, to get one’s eyes opened, I learned… )

    I’m insisting that ignoring/denying OUR side’s evil can’t fool or convince G-D itself, & that objectivity is how it sees all,

    & any Continuum/Soul which holds that it is child-of-G-D … that continuum NEEDS to get holding to G-D’s standards, including objectivity.

    Seeing what actually IS, you know?

    shruggeth

    I’ve linked to evidence, & provided correct reasoning, but nobody has ANY obligation to tolerate that there’s ANY truth in either:

    ideology/prejudice/religion/programming/Kahneman1-mind ( Kahneman’s “Thinking Fast and Slow”, THE most important book in all psychology, in the world, now

    https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Fast-Slow-Daniel-Kahneman-ebook/dp/B00555X8OA/ NONE of my links are “affiliate” links: read the sample, there, & invest-in-truth if you find something, anything, to be truth, if you want. You determine what you find to be true, obviously. )

    all the imprint->reaction mind, no matter what it’s labelled, has the right to ideologically reject both evidence & correct-reasoning.

    WHEN one begins finding-out what’s being hidden by one’s own-side’s propaganda, there is nothing more demoralizing, more depressing, even betraying-of-one’s-belief.

    Nothing.

    But upright-ones require uprightness, & if “our side” has been warring against uprightness, then either we are accommodating it, XOR we are attacking it, for uprightness’s sake.

    Same with any cancer: accommodating it produces future-life-destruction, whereas fighting it, really digging-in, COSTS, but may save one’s life, itself…

    Ignore or dig-in, whichever you want.

    I’ve provided enough examples-of-evidence, & no reader of this has any obligation to step outside of ideology & actually-consider evidence, let-alone keep-digging until even-more objective-view gets put in their gaze.

    which is enough: Empiricists have all the convincing they need, & ideologues won’t ever be convinced, anyways: that is The Great Filter which will extinguish nearly-all of this-world’s population, this century’s deathmatch.

    Salut, Namaste, & Kaizen.

    _ /\ _


  • "Acute, short-lived reactions are often fairly benign, whereas chronic, unremitting courses carry a poor prognosis. Delayed, intermittent phenomena (“flashbacks”) and LSD-precipitated functional disorders that usually respond to treatment appropriate for the non-psychedelic-precipitated illnesses they resemble, round out this temporal means of classification. The question of organic brain damage as well as permanent changes in personality, attitudes, and creativity in patients and normals who have repeatedly ingested psychedelic drugs is controversial, but tends to point to subtle or nonsignificant changes. Future areas for study of the psychedelics’ pharmacological, psychological, and therapeutic effects are suggested. "

    which is from this scientific paper: https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/citation/1984/10000/adverse_reactions_to_psychedelic_drugs__a_review.1.aspx

    Claiming that flashbacks “is not evidence-based”, as you claim, is pseudoscientific disinformation, according to that paper’s abstract.

    Case closed.

    _ /\ _


  • While I invite anyone to read the source-materials I’ve linked-to, & see the evidence, yourselves…

    Kahneman1-mind, imprint->reaction mind, ideology/prejudice/“religion”/programming, pre-vetoes it all, as it isn’t within-ideology “authorized”, right?

    Considered-reasoning is Kahneman2 mind ( he called it “system 2”, without identifying, in its name, what the hell context the “system” was meant in, which is why I don’t bother with his labels ), & it actually does dig into evidence, before deciding.

    Nobody “owes” … “me”, or ANYbody, really, … considering evidence, before deciding that they “don’t need to” consider any more evidence, right?

    It’s normal, it’s done all the time, authority’s better than Empiricism anyday, & that’s good-enough for “normal”, right?

    So, whichever side your religion is on, establishment-knows-what-validity-is XOR evidence-based-knowing, … just go with that side’s habit!

    What could be the cost of getting that wrong??

    ( both short-term, on a specific issue, vs long-term, the habit of getting that wrong… )

    The evidence does check-out, though…

    benJoseph was Essene,

    brought-up very differently than what mainstream Jews would have been,

    didn’t marry in his teens,

    did study/know Eastern stuff that simply had no business being known among conventional Jews,

    did leave evidences galore in the later-recorded “New Testament”,

    did leave esoteric evidences in “Gospel of Mary”,

    & left record in the East, with exactly the same attitude & message he consistently displayed within the Roman Empire in that evidence…

    & … establishment disallows ALL of that, & more!

    Decide where your integrity resides, & go with that!

    _ /\ _







  • Your insight that taxes need to be corrected gradually is right.

    Technically, each economy would have its own powerlaws for correcting taxes, regulations, etc, so in 1 economy it would be something like…

    The current tax on this is a%, the all-future-costs-included tax, which makes the creators-of-those-costs pay them up-front, is b%,

    so this year we’re changing the tax from a% to (( 5 * a ) + ( 1 * b )) / 6

    or something like that…

    Always tending towards the correct rate…

    That rendition would give 6y for reaching equilibrium.

    The more-agile the economy, the quicker it could calibrate to truth…


    The political reality, however, won’t permit that, will it?

    _ /\ _


  • https://www.gutenberg.org/files/29288/29288-h/29288-h.htm#The_Life_of_Saint_Issa

    then scroll down to section IV, & begin reading there…

    You will notice the COHERENCY of this stuff, with the record of benJoseph in the New Testament…

    Ignoring this as evidence, when Gospel of Mary corroborates it in a completely-surprising way, … that’s ideology, not Empiricism…

    this excerpt is section V.

    1. In his fourteenth year, young Issa, the Blessed One, came this side of the Sindh and settled among the Aryas, in the country beloved by God.

    2. Fame spread the name of the marvellous youth along the northern Sindh, and when he came through the country of the five streams and Radjipoutan, the devotees of the god Djaïne asked him to stay among them.

    3. But he left the deluded worshippers of Djaïne and went to Djagguernat, in the country of Orsis, where repose the mortal remains of Vyassa-Krishna, and where the white priests of Brahma welcomed him joyfully.

    4. They taught him to read and to understand the Vedas, to cure physical ills by means of prayers, to teach and to expound the sacred Scriptures, to drive out evil desires from man and make him again in the likeness of God.

    5. He spent six years in Djagguernat, in Radjagriha, in Benares, and in other holy cities. The common people loved Issa, for he lived in peace with the Vaisyas and the Sudras, to whom he taught the Holy Scriptures.

    6. But the Brahmins and the Kshatnyas told him that they were forbidden by the great Para-Brahma to come near to those who were created from his belly and his feet;1

    7. That the Vaisyas might only hear the recital of the Vedas, and this only on the festal days, and

    8. That the Sudras were not only forbidden to attend the reading of the Vedas, but even to look on them; for they were condemned to perpetual servitude, as slaves of the Brahmins, the Kshatriyas and even the Vaisyas.

    9. “Death alone can enfranchise them from their servitude,” has said Para-Brahma. “Leave them, therefore, and come to adore with us the gods, whom you will make angry if you disobey them.”

    10. But Issa, disregarding their words, remained with the Sudras, preaching against the Brahmins and the Kshatriyas.

    11. He declaimed strongly against man’s arrogating to himself the authority to deprive his fellow-beings of their human and spiritual rights. “Verily,” he said, “God has made no difference between his children, who are all alike dear to Him.”

    12. Issa denied the divine inspiration of the Vedas and the Puranas, for, as he taught his followers,—"One law has been given to man to guide him in his actions:

    13. “Fear the Lord, thy God; bend thy knees only before Him and bring to Him only the offerings which come from thy earnings.”

    14. Issa denied the Trimurti and the incarnation of Para-Brahma in Vishnu, Siva, and other gods; “for,” said he:

    15. "The eternal Judge, the eternal Spirit, constitutes the only and indivisible soul of the universe, and it is this soul alone which creates, contains and vivifies all.

    16. "He alone has willed and created. He alone has existed from eternity, and His existence will be without end; there is no one like unto Him either in the heavens or on the earth.

    17. "The great Creator has divided His power with no other being; far less with inanimate objects, as you have been taught to believe, for He alone is omnipotent and all-sufficient.

    18. "He willed, and the world was. By one divine thought, He reunited the waters and separated them from the dry land of the globe. He is the cause of the mysterious life of man, into whom He has breathed part of His divine Being.

    19. "And He has put under subjection to man, the lands, the waters, the beasts and everything which He created, and which He himself preserves in immutable order, allotting to each its proper duration.

    20. "The anger of God will soon break forth upon man; for he has forgotten his Creator; he has filled His temples with abominations; and he adores a multitude of creatures which God has subordinated to him;

    21. "And to gain favor with images of stone and metal, he sacrifices human beings in whom dwells part of the Spirit of the Most High;

    22. "And he humiliates those who work in the sweat of their brows, to gain favor in the eyes of the idler who sitteth at a sumptuous table.

    23. "Those who deprive their brothers of divine happiness will themselves be deprived of it; and the Brahmins and the Kshatriyas shall become the Sudras of the Sudras, with whom the Eternal will stay forever.

    24. “In the day of judgment the Sudras and the Vaisyas will be forgiven for that they knew not the light, while God will let loose his wrath upon those who arrogated his authority.”

    25. The Vaisyas and the Sudras were filled with great admiration, and asked Issa how they should pray, in order not to lose their hold upon eternal life.

    26. "Pray not to idols, for they cannot hear you; hearken not to the Vedas where the truth is altered; be humble and humiliate not your fellow man.

    27. “Help the poor, support the weak, do evil to none; covet not that which ye have not and which belongs to others.”

    VI.


    The Catholicism I was brought-up in held that Pontius Pilate was basically evil, but the Christian bible which instructs this view is contradicting the evidence right in it, in its previous lines!

    Pontius Pilate fought for rule-of-Just-law, against rule-of-legalism…

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew 27%3A22-24&version=AMP

    Here’s the portion of the NT where Pilate finds no guilt in benJoseph, but Herod does, & the Christian Bible falsely asserts that they were allied in Herod’s determination…

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke 23&version=AMP

    ( verse 12 is the explicit-disinformation in their bible, the 1st paragraph is 1 of the records in their bible of Pilate’s siding with benJoseph, & with rule-of-Just-law, but being powerless against legalism. Matthew’s record seems to be significantly better, in showing Pilate’s meaning… )


    I find fighting-with the machiavellian contamination throughout the Abrahamic religions’ texts to be exhausting…

    That Genesis was rewritten so that “the fruit of the knowledge-of-good-and-evil”,

    which means MORALITY …

    … which motherhood established in women, then women shared with men…

    corroborating that, researchers from Exeter & Bristol universities, studying wasps in Panama, discovered that altruism among wasps is generalized-mothering…

    https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/29677/20210216/babysitting-neighbors-what-tropical-paper-wasps-according-research.htm

    exactly as AwakeSoulism/Buddhism had explained that altruism is generalized-mothering literally-millenia ago ( hence the term “all our kind mothers”, referring to the ocean-of-all-other-continuums. Not SurfaceMinds, but Souls/Continuums: the apparentl-level isn’t reality. )…

    … men perverted their “scripture” from speaking profound-truth, that the-fruit-of-the-knowledge-of-good-and-evil, aka morality/moral-understanding, was eaten by women & shared with men,

    to, instead, directly putting lies into scripture, to dishonestly accuse women, to justify male-bullying of women?

    & Catholicism went & perverted that into “original sin”…

    I happen to find the original truth still-visible in Genesis ( & that bit of G-D chattering insecurely … puh-leeze … how shallow does egotistical-projection have to be, before it gets called-out, by believers?? ).

    As always, ideology rejects “having eyes to see”, & rejects all outside itself, right?


    The treachery embodied in Abrahamic “scripture” is tiresome.

    Gospel of Peter apparently is the root of some of the Matthew/Mark/Luke stuff, & Peter’s testimony that Roman crucifixion meant spikes-through-hands was utterly-baseless…

    Roman crucifixion was spikes-through-wrists.

    But, hey, it’s “scripture” so long as it’s pushing a belief, & truth isn’t a dependency, right??

    like that idiocy in Matthew where it claims benJoseph’s lineage is 1 series, then contradicts itself, claiming it isn’t human-lineage at all…

    Anything to overwhelm people into “believing”, right?

    Bah!

    ( :


  • Part2…


    So, no, I simply don’t accept that all that evidence “isn’t valid”, “doesn’t count”, & “has no basis”, as many have insisted is “authoritatively established”.

    Gospel of Mary is evidence that had a cause, & that cause was esoteric-Buddhism, through benJoseph, to Mary.

    ( it is theoretically-possible that some powerful-conspiracy faked it, many centuries ago, … but … not bloody likely, is it? )

    Evidences I’ve pointed-out all are ignored/denied by establishment.

    There are other evidences, but ideology which rejects these, has no problem rejecting all the rest, too,

    so therefore I’m not going to bother identifying any more, beyond this stuff

    ( ANY reader’s ideology, not specifically the ideology/preset-belief of the one I’m replying to! Write for the reasoning to stand on its own! : )

    & my Empiricist ideology/“religion” is equally nonvalid in the eyes of all ideologies/“religions” which reject/contempt Empiricism, right?

    Ideologies/“religions” are “self-sufficient”, & reject falsification, automatically!

    All pack-animals, herd-beasts, & animals-with-social-identity have some kind of imprint->reaction mind.

    ( Kahneman’s “Thinking Fast and Slow” is the key to understanding this ideology/prejudice/“religion”/programming mind’s nature, & contrasting it against considered-reasoning, the other mind-system his work showed

    https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Fast-Slow-Daniel-Kahneman-ebook/dp/B00555X8OA/

    that is the single-most-important-book in all psychology, right now, for understanding why ideology’s rising, fighting-off considered-reasoning, throughout our entire planet,

    & will continue doing-so, as stress energizes the animal-pack-dominance circuitry throughout humankind’s limbic-brains & brainstems )

    Empiricism insists that WHEN evidence falsifies one’s worldview, THEN one HAS TO accept that, & adapt to new/more-open worldview.

    NEVER have I encountered any politically-motivated one, or any “religious” one, or any doctor, or for that matter any pusher-of-Scientism, including the fundamentalist neo-atheists, … who would accept evidence’s falsifying their fundamental-identity-tied-beliefs…

    Not even once.

    I’ve seen an article on how some guy noticed that in Science people are supposed to argue then change-their-mind if the evidence or reasoning justifies it, but … he was openly admitting he’d never seen that done!

    Not by him, not by ANYone!

    I’ve done it, but I’m autistic, so am defective, according to valid-people…

    My childhood was Catholic, but that got falsified by the evidence which meditations, themselves put in me.

    To presume that the meditations didn’t also put objective-truth in benJoseph, is to presume that meditations simply don’t produce that category of result, which many ideologies/religions do presume.

    The Essenes had “The Book of Meditation”, which was important to them.

    Where would someone brought-up with The Book of Meditation go, to dig into the root of meditation?

    East.

    Is there any evidence that meditation was central to benJoseph’s religion?

    Here’s an entire book on that: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00VGJABY4/

    ( that book, like all Christian stuff, ignores the fact that John kept calling benJoseph “rabbi”, while railing against the false “Jews”.

    Gospel of John didn’t have falsifying-quotes, as we modern-people have, for indicating bitter-sarcasm.

    Rev explicitly states “those who call themselves Jews, but are not”.

    However, by “conveniently” ignoring that John was attacking only the false “Jews”, “Christianity” “justified” holocausting Jews for centuries.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation 2%3A9&version=AMP

    take that same concept, false-Jews, & map it into John, & suddenly his repeating of “rabbi” for benJoseph, while railing against the “Jews”, … suddenly that identifies that John had no problem with real Jews, only gaslighters who falsely-claimed they were Jewish-religion living…

    How much mass torture-murder did Christianity enforce against Jews, for sake of that “convenient” misinterpretation??

    Spoto didn’t crack the disinformation, so therefore take his main-point, but he got this point wrong, & anguished over his misinterpretation-of-the-evidence. )

    Established-belief’s never accepting Universe’s falsification of it, is to be expected, of ideology/“religion”/programming, right?


    I can’t remember the book which identified it, but it’s obvious to those who’ve been-there,

    that he was sometimes speaking from human-perspective, & at other-times he was simply a kind of empty-vase, through-which greater-meaning was speaking,

    ( I’m later including an excerpt from Notovich’s book, which also makes this clear-as-day, btw, below )

    & as that book mentioned, that was automatically-understood at the time, because that was a mode people were aquainted-with,

    but nowadays it’s automatically disallowed as any kind of potential,

    so therefore people in the new-view simply aren’t seeing what was normal, in that context…


    Joseph of Aramathea was weathy, & gave him a grave, & I’ve read he traveled around, from England to Asia, for his tin-mine/tin-trade business, too,

    so maintaining that there was “no basis” as many say, for him to have done any such thing, when he could simply have participated in that trade-route, & got everywhere he needed-to,

    doesn’t wash as a “proof” that he never did any such thing.

    ( & pretending that “the lost years” & his NOT being married were … oddities which somehow “don’t count” … isn’t even worth respecting as intellectually-honest.

    He lived different his entire life, not just suddenly beginning at the age of 29-ish. )


    ( these are just off the top of my head, read Thomas Ragland’s book, if you care to see evidence with your own eyes… )

    New Testament:

    “what a Continuum/Soul sows, it cannot escape reaping” === karma.

    his absolutely-correct statement about all who are not “born in LivingSpirit” not being saved:

    he was talking of Bodhichitta, exactly as the ancient rishis of Hinduism were talking about:

    ( nobody who has experienced it CAN misunderstand what he was saying )

    G-D’s religion’s bedrock is bodhichitta.

    I experienced it once, & it is completely worldview-altering, even if one experiences it for only a single second.

    benJoseph was right: without the unlimited frame-of-reference of bodhichitta, aka Ahimsa-GNOSIS, then one doesn’t even know what LivingSpirit means, in its frame-of-reference.


    ( that got cut by the char-limit, to there’s a Part3 next, sorry for the rigorous-correctness, people, but breaking disinformation, when it’s really established, takes correctness… : )


  • 1stly, feel free to completely-disregard everything I say,

    not-only here, but everywhere.

    Feel free to report my comments for removal, because I’m not saying what establishment is saying.

    Feel free to downvote everything I’ve ever said, because it’s said by somebody who doesn’t obey establishment’s “view”.

    I’m Empiricist: that’s my religion.

    It’s a religion hated by ALL ideologies/prejudices/“religions”/programmings which are adamant that their non-allowing-falsification is valid,

    & that contradictory-evidence is “violation” of their “authoritative” belief.

    So, I invite you to “join the majority” & contempt “me” & all meanings that appear to be of “me”.

    ( I’d rather be honestly-contempted than dishonestly “accepted”, by all : )

    Now for the presented-position… ( this may have to be chopped into multiple-pieces, simply because of the character-limit-per-comment: it’s rigorous )


    I’m not saying he was repeating/parroting other-traditions.

    I AM saying that he dug into all he could, of multiple traditions, and there is stark evidence IN the “New Testament”/New-Covenant itself that he was Buddhist, to any competent Buddhist,

    ( expect a competent botanist to see botanical-evidence that nobody-else sees, expect a competent geek to see logical-evidence that normal people don’t see, expect competent Buddhists to see evidence of it where people ignorant of it, don’t see it.

    That is natural. : )


    The ideology/“religion” that “all swans are white: if it isn’t white, it can’t be a valid swan”

    is falsifiable by the existence, anywhere, anywhen, of any non-white swan.

    Australian black swans falsify it, outright.

    WHEN someone who is devout-to-the-belief rejects falsification, they’re practicing dogma, not Science/Empiricism.

    That is the bedrock of all truth, in my worldview.

    Therefore, ANY true evidence which falsifies ANY believed-in-belief, can force, within Empiricism, worldview-change, right?


    Evidence showing benJoseph was Eastern-educated/learned is irrefutable.

    https://www.amazon.com/Noble-Eightfold-Path-Christ-Buddhism-ebook/dp/B010TB0UPY/

    is ONLY working within the New Testament:

    Gospel of Mary is on top of that evidence.

    Notovich’s reporting of what Hemis Monastery had, re his “lost years” is corroborated/proven by what’s in Gospel of Mary, which has no justification to exist, otherwise…


    As “The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible” noted, the way benJoseph named the bible was Essene, and NOT any other faction’s way.

    It’s near the beginning of that book, where this is noted…

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B008CGU6JY/

    'Qumran (4QMMT): “And we have also written to you so that you may have discernment in the book of Moses and in the books of the Prophets and in Dav[id].”

    (It is interesting to note that Jesus uses almost the same terminology in Luke 24:44:

    “. . . that everything written about me in the Law of Moses, in the Prophets, and in the Psalms must be fulfilled.”)’

    Habits, including naming-habits, are automatic.

    I don’t for an instant believe that was either faked, in the Christian bible, or magically insignficant/non-evidence different-from-normal-Jew’s-phrasing.

    Here’s proof that that book’s statement checks-out:

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke 24%3A44&version=AMP

    My habit of using the term OceanOfAllAwakeSouls for G-D is likewise a naming-habit that gives-away the fundamental identity of my entire religion.

    Some “little” habits are BIG keys.

    ANY presumption that he grew-up in a Pharisee, or other major-faction, childhood/youthhood, would be standing on … rather tenuous ground, given that bit of evidence.

    Essenes were outcasts/aliens, from normal Judaism’s reality.


    ( I am using Amazon.com links specifically because of the reviews AND the readable-samples, for the ebooks. )

    Both of these are excellent:

    https://www.amazon.com/Gospel-Mary-Magdala-Jesus-Apostle/dp/0944344585/

    https://www.amazon.com/Gospel-Mary-Translation-Holistic-Approach-ebook/dp/B00EBAFTD8/

    I’m *explicitly NOT recommending “The New New Testament”, which rendered a muddled blob of mess, which DISincludes the evidences that both King & Mattison gave cleanly.

    1. “Space Conqueror” simply has no business being in ANY Abrahamic-religion work, of ANY kind: it’s from an entirely-different system-of-knowing.

    https://www.amazon.com/Dhammapada-Easwarans-Classics-Indian-Spirituality-ebook/dp/B004DI7R56/ for leverage in understanding why that term would be Buddhist-normal,

    In my eyes Jewish origin for it? … absurd/impossible.

    1. the odd use of the word “powers”. Read the screamingly-advanced ( compared with Western psychology ) book by Beth Jacobs “The Original Buddhist Psychology”,

    in which she realized that the diagram of the root elemental processes in a single-perception, were the same, as described by Buddha Gautama & as described by modern neurological-science machines. ( EEG, MEG, fMRI, individual-neuron-measuring, the connectome’s mapping, etc )

    Her entire book is just an intro to the original Buddhist psychology, btw.

    https://www.amazon.com/Original-Buddhist-Psychology-Abhidharma-Experience-ebook/dp/B01LZ18OMY/

    For the “main meal” of it, you’d need to read this monster, which without Beth Jacobs’ intro, isn’t going to work, for most humans

    https://download.pariyatti.org/_xUn1HgkZ/Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma.pdf

    ( other books, there: https://store.pariyatti.org/ebooks-shelf )

    1. Stainless-Soul/Continuum doctrine, which exactly-contradicts Catholic “original sin” doctrine.

    Stainless-Continuum doctrine has no root in any Abrahamic-religion which accepts the intentionally-adulterated Genesis ( which I get-to later ) … this is essence-of-Buddhism itself.

    https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/primordially-pure-nature

    gives you the same concept, in that-concept’s modern-world home, Vajrayana.


    I’m NOT accepting any “disallowing” of surprising-to-establishment-evidence IN the New Testament, OR in Gospel of Mary.

    Evidence shows what benJoseph’s nature actually was.

    IF someone’s establishment/ideology/religion prohibits the evidence from the New Testament, as shown in Thomas Ragland’s book, from being valid,

    AND it prohibits the evidence in “Gospel of Mary” also from being valid,

    AND it prohibits the evidence in Notovich’s report of what Hemis Monastery had, which justifies “Gospel of Mary”, outright,

    then fine, that’s their unfalsifiable-belief, & therefore their constitutional religious-right.

    Empiricism’s my religion: WHEN evidence falsifes a worldview, that worldview is falsified. Period.

    Adapt, move-on, hold-to-what-is-true, & evolve, as G-D intended, right?


    ( copy-paste from my mindmap of the pieces of this broke, so … it’ll be continued in Part-2 : )



  • The Dems had the opportunity to do something,

    & they instead committed assumption-of-victory & making-believing-of-victory.

    Those don’t work.

    Trump promised his followers they’d never have to vote again.

    Don’t expect to be able to escape Trump’s rule:

    they’ve literally 10’s of thousands of appointees lined-up to prevent civil-rights from ever interfering with their highjacking of the country.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if Trump had the entire Dem electorate arrested, shortly after stepping-in, & had someone torture/interrogate some of them, until a “confession” was produced, & then hanged them all, outside of the gov’t buildings.

    I don’t think he’s got the balls to do that, but he’s openly admired Putin’s psychopathy, & through the years, he’s becoming more & more psychopathic himself…

    where will he draw the line, today? tomorrow? the following season? the next year?

    The Dems gave away their chance.

    I don’t expect them to ever get any chance to correct anything, now.

    Some changes are permanent, in spite of “status quo’s” pretending that nothing changes…

    _ /\ _

    ( sorry I replied 2x: I didn’t remember having replied, before…

    brain-injury, so memory problems.

    I’ll leave both up, to show that I’m daft, is all.

    Apologies : )





  • Replace “religion” with ideology/prejudice/“religion”/programming, & you’ve got it.

    Don’t discount “secular religion”, as it’s every bit as cancerous as the other kinds of ideology/prejudice.

    I consider political-motivation to be a mental-illness: apolitical is the only SANE motivation, that’s clear…

    ( political-motivation is essentially a virus: IF you accept this ideology’s-dominion, THEN the ones who benefit will benefit, & we ignore all the harm done…

    That isn’t good-enough, for me.

    See things as they ACTUALLY are, not as politics asserts they are, & then set about objectively being coherently-constructive…

    but that requires fighting-off ALL ideologies, as they cannot-tolerate objectivity! it is poison to them!! )

    _ /\ _


  • Wait until you find-out about “recognized” evidence vs “not scientifically valid” evidence…

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_blob

    To me that’s Greenland icemelt water, which, being freshwater, & therefore less-dense than salt-water, forms a skimcoat on the North Atlantic.

    To the Consensus Science Establishment, it’s hogwash to claim so, because they haven’t authorized that to be scientifically valid.

    What ELSE could have produced it, except icemelt??

    Morons…

    Here’s some climate-scientists admitting that NONE of their climate-models have included Greenland icemelt until 2024,

    & that when you include that, then the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current … visibly has been shutting-down since 1950 or so.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-024-01568-1

    This-decade, they expect that there will be more than a MILLION FEWER CUBIC-KILOMETRES of water flowing through AMOC, than in the 1940-1950 decade.

    Thanks to “only the Authorized speak Valid Science” paradigm, then worthless people like us, who insist that not-only is The Cold Blob climate-significant, it’s ecologically significant, as it’s got to be poisoning all zooplankton who get caught in it ( due to its low-salt ), thus trashing part of the ecology of a HUGE area of our planet…

    our stating-the-fucking-obvious is nonvalid.


    My religion’s Empiricism: it doesn’t matter “who” you are: IF it’s true, THEN it’s true.

    You can be a homeless person with no highschool, you can be a many-times-degreed person with a Nobel Prize, & IF it tests-to-be-true, THEN it tests-to-be-true.

    Consensus “Science” is Scientism: it works by holding that itself is valid, & all outside itself isn’t.

    This “Consensus Science” ignored huge, important evidence, until it was too-late.

    7 decades too late, in AMOC’s case.

    at 2C warmer it’ll be 33% shut-down.

    England’s going to be having Canadian climate, this-century.

    Kiss their food-growing-capacity for their traditional crops, goodbye.


    The real problem is that the proper paradigm is Empiricism, but then you have to decide on each piece of evidence/information,

    & to do that, you have to have people who decide…

    Establishment defaults to deciding that itself is valid, & outsiders are nonvalid.

    Empiricism has to do differently, but that takes more energy, more work, more integrity, etc, & therefore is more-fragile…

    Which is why establishment-self-importance has such an easy time displacing integrity from our world…

    It could be done, but would require a systems-of-systems approach to identifying validity in scientific evidence…


    Now try mapping that from science to populations:

    What are the criteria for “a valid people”?

    What are the criteria for “right to self-govern”?

    Do you see how no matter who decides, others are offended by that specific decision?

    How the upright will decide things 1 way, but the machiavellian-psychopaths will decide in fundamentally-different ways, consistently?

    Do you see how IF you decide to do The Right Thing, now there are very-heavily-armed-thugs who will murder one’s family & self, in order to prevent one from “infringing on the mafia’s turf”, to remap the international-politics onto organized-crime?

    It isn’t politically-possible to Do The Right Thing, & survive having done that, right?

    Therefore, one tries to find what compromise … one can live-with, for now …

    & … then one finds one is trapped in multiple abusive-relationships, & can’t get out, without making things even worse

    & this is approximately the current-situation of every country ( with uprightness ) in the world.

    IT ISN’T POSSIBLE TO WIN.

    It only is possible to lose-less, if one is careful, in this world-game…

    _ /\ _