Just wait a year or two and find out.
Just wait a year or two and find out.
This just seems particularly cruel to me. You’re already miserable standing in line, then you get blown up.
Well as usual it’s all about money. You can look it up because I can’t remember the guy’s name but a former politician owns a substantial stake in the body scanners used in airports.
I think they’ve gotten better but I remember reports in the past that said they missed over 90% of the guns/weapons that were put through as a test. So I’m pretty sure it isn’t about security, especially when mail was loaded into the cargo hold essential unchecked( this could have changed too, my data is pretty old).
I mean none of it makes sense. You can only bring what 3oz. of fluids, like two or three people can’t just combine fluids. But you ARE spending $5.00 for a bottle of water in the other side.
Seems a little high for a 2002 model. Is it 4 wheel drive?
Exactly.
That’s not the solution. We need more guns. Since there are more guns than people in the US, I would guess the shootings would end when we have 2/person. Or maybe more powerful guns or twice as many cops. I’m really not an expert on this.
I assumed this was crap. I mean they had antivaxers for the flu in what was it, 1927? Plus they can’t even keep lights red now. How did they do it before computers were invented.
I don’t doubt the vaccine was well received but this sounds a bit over the top.
I think it’s their money and they can do anything they want with it.
Well I guess Trump was just being respectful when he admired his ability to govern 1.4 billion people with an iron fist. And being tough on him when he imposed tariffs on washing machines that drastically increased the price of both washers and dryers for the American people because tariffs are paid by us.
Don’t worry I’m just being respectful right now.
He’s stringing them along until he gets tough on them.
I’m guessing they are very specific as to which terms have been violated in their decision to remove.
Well, you kind of did when you said some people need to rent. Why would anyone rent to that someone for no profit? How would that landlord live? Government subsidies?
I also know at least one person who prefers to rent an apartment because he doesn’t want to mow the lawn or fix a faucet. He just called the superintendent.
They may be what YOU are saying, but that is not what MANY here say. I’ve seen it many times that profiting on something essential for life is wrong/evil.
I can see the evil in what these large corporations are doing but I have rented in the past when I was neither prepared for the burden of home ownership nor planning to stay in that location for a long time. If I couldn’t have rented what would I have done? I would have been essentially FORCED into owning a home or what, living in the streets? And what if you wish to move but no one wants to buy your house? More you are forced to stay out turn evil by buying two houses.
It’s ok to love your aunt. She didn’t make the rules she’s just living by them. If there’s a problem with the system, start at the top.
That’s why I’m very picky about donating. When I was at my very first job, pushing 1200 packages an hour at UPS for hourly wages, I donated to the United Way via payroll deduction. I was listening to the news in my car when I heard the CEO of United Way took his family on a $2M vacation. I had that payroll deduction removed on the very next shift.
Yes. He murdered someone. Will I curl up in a ball and cry for hours if he’s never caught? Not so much.
There goes that neighborhood.