Why was this written like this? It makes no sense. I’ll git blame it and ask them what’s going on. Oh it’s me…

Isn’t new York flooded right now?

I just peeked at the docs and right off the bat I don’t like how they have conflicting attributes like hx-get and hx-post. What happens if both are set at the same time? Why not just have hx-method?

Because it’s the country the company is based in.

By the end of the meeting you have 10 more questions and no answers and more meetings to discuss the new questions

But they’re both Walt Disney, so does this say that he did character voices while masturbating?

I fully support kicking kids off their phones in class, I don’t think any lesson no matter how engaging can compete with that. I’m not supposed to be on my phone during meetings, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to ban phones from class. I was just commenting that work can be done to make lessons more engaging when phones aren’t involved. There’s of course a limit to what you can do, and some subjects are just inherently harder to get kids into, like statistics. But seriously good on you for doing that. I’m sure that while it didn’t have perfect engagement, it was far better than just teaching it to the book.

Just curious, is there a place you can share that lesson plan to other teachers? It’d be a shame for all that work you did to not get to be used in other classrooms as well.

You can increase motivation to learn by making lessons more engaging even if it’s a subject they’re not personally interested in. But making lessons more interesting and engaging is not easy and we can’t expect all teachers to have the skills and resources to do the research and development needed to produce lesson plans that are really interesting. I think it could be improved by putting more money into developing interesting lesson plans centrally and distributing the materials to teachers to follow instead of just producing dry curriculums. Teachers need support.

C, it combines the victim into a horrible overlapping monster of body parts

Same reason you use typescript. It helps you catch bugs and follow programming best practices. You also don’t need typescript, but with it your code is better. Typescript is technically just a really fancy linter. The actual compilation mainly just removes the type data and does some JavaScript engine compatibility.

You’re being tracked but nobody is paying attention.

HP has been shit for decades now, it’s not some techie secret. Companies used to live and die by their reputation. What happened?

Why do the typescript extensions to eslint exist then?

They’re all con artists. The people buying them were trying to scam someone else.

No, it’s not a pyramid scheme, it’s not a ponzi scheme, it’s just a good old fashioned investment scheme.

The benefit is that you could have a distributed marketplace. Instead of having monopolies like steam where one company accumulates a bunch of power they can abuse you could have multiple small companies band together to support a common standard of ownership so you could buy from any company and all the companies supporting the standard would respect it. You could also tie it to a legal contract so it’s actually enforceable.

Of course you could just do that with an centralized standard that’s backed by multiple companies too.

NFT buyers were also scammers since their intention was to sell it off to the next patsy

They weren’t even uniquely drawn, they just mr potato head combined a handful of components

Stop buying HP. Seriously what the hell is wrong with people?

And eslint and setting up tsconfig for your project structure.