Ah the joys of lost social cues

Different instances are federated with different groups of other instances. By posting to multiple instances it makes it more likely that people would see the post that they would have otherwise not seen.

Original for more pixels

Art by Cal Kearns

Like this

If not clear you, not what you.

I read other. Context let fill the.

Fixed

I’ve been using that one, but it’s awful for adding text.

You wouldn’t drink Valmond milk?

Big update!

It seems the images that are successful are all PNG files. I can

This issue also seems to be related to the Clipboard API. My thinking behind this is that I cannot use this example page for jpeg/jpg images, but it works fine for PNG.

https://evercoder.github.io/clipboard-inspector/

I have learned that if I use an app to take a jpg file that I cannot paste and convert it to PNG, then it works.

I use Image Toolbox for converting without saving an image.

https://github.com/T8RIN/ImageResizer

Apparently, no amount of complaining, begging, and letters to Congress are going to fix it so, here we are.

There are other stronger actions available before advocating for killing. Let’s focus on those first, eh?

Never did such a thing. Lying should not be necessary to try to make a point.

I’m very confused about what you’re claiming. Are you saying I somehow edited a comment’s user?

Regardless, I’m not using multiple accounts to… argue with myself?

If a comment author changed username, I would be dubious of the platform you’re using to view this thread. Could be an issue with an app you’re using.

Are you talking about enkers’s comment? I saw their response, which was clearly meant for me and responded. Then they deleted that comment and moved it to where they intended to put it, so I did the same.

https://sh.itjust.works/comment/15571731

The book’s methodologies: https://www.ericachenoweth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/WCRW-Appendix.pdf

The data set:
https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi%3A10.7910%2FDVN%2FMHOXDV

Here’s the methodologies of the book

https://www.ericachenoweth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/WCRW-Appendix.pdf

I couldn’t get past the 4th example of “non-violence” without laughing at how wildly revisionist they are. While each of these had non-violent components, none of them would have succeeded without violence.

I believe the violent aspects of these resistances are considered and included in the overall analysis in the book I linked.

I think you may be jumping to conclusions when you see something that doesn’t immediately fall into your own views. Those examples are clearly a simplified and truncated set to quickly get the point across for the purpose of an “About Us” page while there is lots of in-depth information available throughout the site.

If you have qualms with their findings or data, you’d be better off taking it up with them instead of me. I don’t purport to be an expert on this subject. I am only relaying that there is plenty of credible research, data, and analysis that shows that non-violent resistance is effective.

Edit

Here you can see how and why the book defines these. The book and its author is a major resource for the website.

https://www.ericachenoweth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/WCRW-Appendix.pdf

The book itself is based on multiple studies. Here is the first part of the second paragraph for the book’s description:

Combining statistical analysis with case studies of specific countries and territories […]

The website has some other studies referenced and such. It kinda seems that you barely opened either of the links.

deleted by creator

“anecdotes”? Yes, you have clearly missed a lot. There’s lots available and easy to find. I don’t think you need me to hold your hand.

Here’s a full dataset if you want: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi%3A10.7910%2FDVN%2FMHOXDV