Important context, I would say

Maybe a family member? He’s old enough to see a grandparent have the quality of their last days stolen.

Well, they’ve generally moved on from “it isn’t real”, to “it’s the natural cycle and out of our control”, so I’m gonna say blame the Dems!

It would seem to do that, yes. You don’t even have to be abroad, as you could easily be stationed in a different state from your “home” residence.

This has no effect on federal elections of course, and so I think it’s not that unreasonable to say that you only get to vote on local issues if you are living locally.

I don’t think incivility deserves civility in return, but apparently you were being sarcastic? It’s hard to distinguish because people unironically say the same things you did.

Removed by mod

Oh you mean like the guy he was replying to?

The facts: An IBM subsidiary removes a reference to work done from its website.

Your take: A BRAZEN ASSAULT AGAINST ISRAEL’S RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE

Actually not all dogs just have their tongue out all the time. Mostly they pant when they get hot.

I can sort of see the point of farming downvotes on Reddit because, as pointless as it is, you can at least see how many you’ve accumulated.

For you to do this here? I’m struggling to understand what you get out of this. Kind of weird man, so maybe you should think about what the point of all this is.

You’re right, the correct term is bigot. You’re a bigot.

Sanctions that China also voted for, making this irrational and illogical behavior, in addition to being dangerous and provocative.

There is no war in ba sing se…

That’s less of an issue with the second game, as you can ignore the timer, but yeah that’s part of why I never really tried the first game.

How is this a relevant question? Nobody said anything about some governing body. There have been discussions on many instances about whether to federate with them or not, and it’s accurate to say that some people think we should.

What they’re actually doing is super shady, and reason enough to cause concern without exaggerating.

Agreed, but the article title implies that they are in fact currently revealing names, which is just not the case.

I swear some people are just contrary.

It seems as though nobody in this thread actually read the article. They are not revealing user names on the site. The objection here is having the real name as part of your private profile data, in case of a future data breach. It’s a real concern, but orders of magnitude less serious than what everybody is assuming.

Shame on Ars for the misleading clickbait headline.

No need to be so defensive, champ.