Yeah, you can run it on anything and its great for even numbered clusters.

You can set up a qdev on a pi or something.

In many ways, yes. It was , and still is to some degree, massively more convenient for the couch gamers. That is what you pay for.

This seems like an obvious bug with the licensing check in the game, or maybe an oversight by nvidia. (bug because one would think it would be adjusted for geforcenow) Why dont you contact nvidia customer service? Ive never used geforce now, but their shield departement is really good.

The little news I’ve seen seems to tag this as a sandbox game, and considering the scale I wouldn’t hold my breath…

It doesn’t mean it’s bad just because it doesn’t cater to your tastes.

Could you elaborate on what I misunderstood so I can learn please? They claim tls encrypted tunnel, which is an end-to-end encryption isnt it? Do you mean that the data itself is not encrypted? What is the significance of this compared to a tls tunnel? If it somehow got mitm attacked they could snoop the unencrypted data?

I seriously curious so please explain.

There are tons of these with 4k support, but almost none with HDR. I have ordered one that does tho, but it came to $16 with shipping. I’m tempted to order a few random ones for $1-3 from China to see if any of them are writeable just to help others that are in need.

They are used for streaming in 4k hdr for people who doesn’t have a display that supports this (but have a TV that does). The reason why almost all of them only support 4k no hdr , I think is because they are mostly used by cryptominers using gpus for mining…

It is end to end encrypted as the data is sent through a tls tunnel. And well, they could spell it out sure. But if that was the only thing the article was complaining about then there wouldn’t be many clicks ;)

Which I already posted before your reply.

So reading another article (https://www.heise.de/news/Microsoft-lays-hands-on-login-data-Beware-of-the-new-Outlook-9358925.html )makes it more clear. If you consent to syncing IMAP account to outlook then it will transfer IMAP username password and mailserver config to Outlook.

I mean, they could have specified that your IMAP credentials would be synced, but it’s redundant considering you’re telling it to sync.

What a clickbaity article. I’m all for exposing bad stuff but this article presents zero proof of it transferring passwords. It also fails to highlight the manner of how data voluntarily synced to MS is handled. All in all it doesn’t do anything but trying to steer users to it’s own services.