What? No. That would be crazy.

I write BDFPR from the bottom.
Though I’m also a heretic who starts G from the middle, so don’t listen to me.

Callbacks and decorators are fine, but callbacks/decorators to a function which itself takes a function pointer and returns another function pointer are crazy.

I’ve thankfully never had to use recursive callbacks or decorators, but it seems like it could very quickly become difficult to keep track of.

If you actually use code like this you’re insane.

Do you say shit like that because nobody can tell the difference between your watch and a cheap one?

So, hormones don’t exist?
Intersex people don’t exist?
Trans people don’t exist?
And what, we’re all either 100% male or 100% female and there is never a grey area in biology?

Don’t make the conscious decision to remain ignorant, you’re keeping yourself back.

Cool, so I’ll get started on building an automated business that sells cheap access to all the music, movies and shows on the streaming services.

Getting consent for each title would basically kill my business and would be implausible, so I’ll just assume it’s ok.

Agreed. I don’t understand the people who claim it’s easier to work with, or better for prototyping.

Automatic typing exists. Type casting exists and is even handled automatically in some scenarios. Languages like java and C# can manage memory for you, and have the same portability and runtime requirement as python.

Prototyping in python and then moving to another language later makes no sense to me at all.

I think it’s context dependent.

The field is called mathematics, but I see math as a short form of mathematic or mathematical.

Calling something a ‘math’ question or a ‘maths’ question both make sense. But something like “I hate math” sounds like you hate a singular mathematic, which sounds weirder to me than “I hate maths” (the field).

You look and sound like the ‘you on kazoo’ kid for the rest of your life. Even at 80 years old, everyone thinks you’re a 9 year old.

He’s got a real disney character face

The original fnaf isn’t that bad, the community is.
It’s not an amazing game, and it’s not a good horror game, but it’s fun for a few hours.

I have aged since but I’m not quite 27 yet, so maybe it worked?
I’ll try adding that eyeglass cleaner and let you know how it’s going when I’m 40.

Are most relationship counselors saying that though?
Like you said, professionals can be wrong, but I’d still be interested in knowing what the general consensus is.

I guess it’s hard to know without surveying them all.

Holy shit you just reminded me of my childhood.
I remember mixing all the things I could find in the bathroom because I thought it would make your hair grow faster and might be the secret to immortality, because none of the scientists would have considered mixing dove and palmolive together.

Check their username ;)

We’re really just sharing opinions though, not facts.

I haven’t found any solid evidence that poly relationships are inherently more difficult or prone to failure than monogamous relationships. Long-lasting relationships are just hard in general.

I feel like there’s too many poly relationship structures to be able to generalise them all like that.

There’s plenty of people who have open relationships, where two people have a very close relationship (sometimes married) but they aren’t sexually exclusive with each other.

I’d also wager that some poly relationship structures would be more stable for lgbt people rather than heterosexual people, solely on the idea that everyone could participate more equally.

I’ve never seen a more perfect use of bog standard

Those all suck, this is the perfect fork.