Are we defending/justifying toxicity now?
Are we defending/justifying toxicity now?
Despite how bad Google Search had become, DuckDuckGo and Bing are somehow still worse. While Google displays the result in the first few, DDG and Bing have no idea what I’m looking for.
Gotta try Kagi sometime.
Training on copyrighted data should be allowed as long as it’s something publicly posted.
If you make it reproduce copyrighted media, it is a problem.
As long as the stuff it generates doesn’t resemble any copyrighted works, even if it was trained on copyrighted works, I don’t see why that should be problem.
Vista was amazing and 8/8.1 was refreshing. Also, Vista introduced hardware accelerated desktop rendering in Windows, finally no more tearing. I enjoyed using them. I personally haven’t had any gripes with any of the recent Windows versions.
I can buy one here in Malaysia.
This smells like investor-baiting. Studios don’t really need to announce that they’re going “aggressive” in using a certain tool.
Don’t talk to me if your average ratio is less than 1.0.
Does it show up when you download other .dmg packages?
I paid for Overwatch too but tbh I’d rather have Overwatch 2. There’s no loot box bullcrap and the playerbase now is actually pretty sizeable now compared to OW1 near the end.
I do miss the free rewards but they’re just cosmetics. A bigger playerbase is more beneficial to the game than more free skins.
I don’t really care about online AI services. I only run stuff locally (Stable Diffusion, LLaMA). No surveillance there.
It’s really not a problem. We have both open source and proprietary solutions for generative AI. If you have the hardware for it, you can generate images locally for free. If you don’t, just use one of the many available services.
It’s literally giving the power of expression to almost everyone, including artists.
Also let’s not talk about jobs/money. Technology replacing jobs isn’t something new and that’s what humanity should strive toward.
You got that backwards. Fuck copyright. Nothing should be copyrighted.
What if ChatGPT claims that the generated text are a compilation from various sources and not its own? Do you need permission to read and summarize an article?
Overwatch 2 is great so it’s not all bad.
Why do you want OW1 back?
Never said that.
If you took a random concept and explained it to a person they could using their existing knowledge set, draw it somewhat competently. That is because people are able to apply knowledge to make something new.
Theoretically it can, but it would involve meticulous and proper labeling of each training data. Currently most of the trained data are automatically labeled and they’re not descriptive/verbose enough. I believe the improvements from the latest version of DALL-E is due to OpenAI’s use of a more advanced image labeler.
I’ve been using the Galaxy A52s for a couple of years now. Never seen ads outside the Samsung apps. SEA region.