I have no idea who that is.

Copyright is law which is used to prevent free copying of media, while “intellectual property” is a term cooked up by corporate suits to generalize copyright, trademarks, and patents and equate them with property law. Richard Stallman wrote about this.

It has become fashionable to toss copyright, patents, and trademarks—three separate and different entities involving three separate and different sets of laws—plus a dozen other laws into one pot and call it “intellectual property.” The distorting and confusing term did not become common by accident. Companies that gain from the confusion promoted it. The clearest way out of the confusion is to reject the term entirely.

Humans are not a threat to the Earth. Do you mean that humans are a threat to the environment? That would mean that we’re a threat to ourselves. It wouldn’t make sense to destroy us to save us from ourselves.

Even when the Proletariat does win, they often still install a dictatorship. Because those are the kinds of people who lead revolutions.

Yes, voting is the baseline. It’s the least you can do.

I’m sure that there are anarchists out there who refuse to vote out of principle, but they still do activist work such as participating in mutual aid groups and so on. They’re wrong, but at least they’re still helping society in some way. I think the vast majority of people who don’t vote are just lazy, though.

Well, yes and no. The Democrat Party is structured to prevent takeovers like what happened to the GOP (e.g. super-delegates). I think it is moving to the left, but glacially slowly. 20 years ago, somebody like Bernie would have been a joke. Now, he’s a viable contender. Maybe in another 50 or 60 years, they’ll be where European leftist parties are now.

Fascism has already won if you’re a person of color.

What do you mean? It only takes one person to do this and upload it?

Respect… dead people? They’re dead…

Well, you were wrong LOLOLOLOLOLOL

LOL. You must’ve been watching a different Dark than the one I did.

Time travel is a difficult trope to do well, because there is so much potential for paradoxes and other confusion. I always find myself going “So, if they could travel through time, couldn’t they just do X?”

In Dark, it started with a good premise, but the last season was a total wreck. It felt slapped together, like they had to come up with an ending in a hurry.

He’s a “free speech absolutist”. Unless the speech offends him.

For external SSD?

That would be awesome. I hate having to find a cable to plug my SSD into. If it was simply a card that could be inserted into a slot, that would be so much easier.

So, Musk could do anything at all with X, and you’d still keep using it. Got it.

Where do you draw the line? What would Musk have to do before you said “Fuck it. I’m not using this site anymore”?

I think it’s important to call out bigotry whenever you see it.

Boycotts can work. Leave, and let people know why you’re leaving. (The second part is important!)

If you look into the detransitioner movement, it is indeed anti-trans.

I’m sure if we ignore him, he’ll just go away. That’s how this works, right?