Yelp, huge red flag.

Imagine how many things that you have to do that only exist because of ridiculous social expectations on what someone else thinks is important.

Being different in a way that would work if conformity was less important shouldn’t be a disability.

It was fine when the limited duration was a reasonable number of years. Anything over 30 years max before being in the public domain is too long.

Pretty sure they will say refriegerate affer opening somewhere on the bottle. They slap that on pickled or high acidity condiments that probably don’t need refridgeration for safety reasons.

I have no idea if it is necessary, if it extends the shelf life, or has no purpose other than making it more likely for people to throw it out if they don’t put it in the fridge.

I put it in the fridge if it says to assuming it might keep it fresh longer. But if I leave something pickled out overnight I will just put it back in the fridge.

Task failed successfully.

AI-enabled is the new “smart” bullshit. I wonder what the next buzzword will be.

But they haven’t threatened to undercut ad blocking yet, so as a comparison they are better.

Hallucinating is a fancy term for BEING WRONG.

Unreliable bullshit generator is still unreliable. Imagine that!

The rubber duck method is just another flavor of thinking out loud.

Compressors fail way too often nowadays. The higher priced old ones were built sturdier and if they didn’t fail in a year because of a defect they run almost indefinitely.

The idea that they never fail comes from survivorship bias.

Banning blatant slurs or directly offensive names is understandable, but unless Harriet means something really offensive there then it is just silly to have that restriction.

The article points out that it is mostly to conform with language structure, but that is still a bit heavy handed.

Valid!

The ability to change it later is also valid!

Valid if you aren’t running dynamic sequel without sanitizing your inputs!

Even if every employee was equally competent, decision making needs to be consolidated enough that it can be decisive and shared throughout large companies. Complex systems that need to change rapidly gain no benefit from having too many people wanting to make decisions, you only need most of them to be competent enough to complete the work based on the decisions of a small group or the work will end up getting too convoluted and unmaintainable.

There really isn’t a benefit to have everyone understand all of the parts of a large and complex system, if they only have time to work on a portion or to facilitate decisions that take into account the knowledge of the people in the different parts.

To keep the number of characters in the core cast to a reasonable size.

All names are valid…

Yes.

In fact I used to help them out before knowing how horribly racist and sexist and selfish they are.

My neighbors vote against doing anything positive like holding companies resposible and making them change their practices to fight climate change.

Fuck 'em.

He doesn’t even need to do it personally since no one can question his ability to pardon whoever does it. So he could order it or just ask “Won’t someone rid me of these troublesome justices?”

Overthrowing democracy was an offical act. - SCOTUS