It really depends on what you like.

Satisfactory was a lot of fun for me but others might not like it.

Stalker 2 the same.

I’m a big Total War nut also.

And Veilguard was good if a little watered down.

I played like 20 hrs of satisfactory last year lol.

However the joke was good so imma let it slide.

This time.

/s

I’ve also been playing games that haven’t been released yet.

Has there ever been an extraction shooter that released?

At the very least it should be his handle/nickname in jail

“Honestly… I’m glad that… that wizard guy is… dead”

– overheard, one of the ents after the battle of Orthanc

Primary source, bro /s

We need a Luigi (the human) Wojak asap.

Nintendo will step in and spoil the fun (hard) if this gets momentum.

Also for human Luigi: Mugshot Vs Twitter pic for drake meme also?

Soul

Warhammer Rogue trader has one character laugh and shout “haha! Reduced to dust” on a kill.

It’s to make the point that they were murdered. It’s a fear tactic with plausible deniability.

You don’t know any 5yo software engineers?

Oh that’s what I was looking for. Nice.

Thing is, any friends and family that click “accept” when an app asked for permission to see their address book will have accidentally released the “good” email.

I wonder whether there shouldn’t just be “an email I can read out to people on the phone” and the rest are all random privacy/hash ones.

Great, so when they abandon the nuclear project in 18mths who will maintain them?

It took me a moment to notice those weren’t specifically security terms…

I won’t understand until I hear piratesoftware explain it.

Plenty of dictators still have elections. Well, they call them elections at least.

So I guess it will at least be called an election.

If something was written by V3 and then published, that text doesn’t get updated every time a new version of chatGPT comes out.

The text isn’t dynamic.

It could be a new level added to the peer review of work. Nothing to do with the university. Just “other professionals”.

A thesis isn’t just an exam, it’s a real scientific paper.

And usually claims is contents as fact, which can be referenced by others as fact.

And absolutely should be open to scrutiny so long as it is relevant.

Yeah but if your wrote your thesis in 2024, and the detector is run on it in 2026…

You’re probably busted.

It’s not like you’ll re-write your thesis with every major ChatGPT release.

I bet AI detection is going to get a lot better over time.

I wonder if there’s going to be retrospective testing of theses as time goes on.

Could really damage some careers down the line.

Edit: guys, retrospective testing means it was done later (i.e. with a more up to date AI detector).