thirtyfold8625

I suspect that there will be issues occasionally, but I don’t think I see any very often. As an example, I got https://archive.is/oc41v as an archive of https://www.reddit.com/r/zelda/comments/1cf6rzl/all_order_to_play_using_a_guide/ just now. Using http://old.reddit.com/ might produce results when using https://www.reddit.com/ didn’t.

Is it more important to you to access a game guide or to bypass blocking? There is probably a game guide that you can access without using Reddit.

I don’t recall a time when I had a problem with using https://www.privacyguides.org/en/tor/#tor-browser to see a Reddit page

This might also express that someone doesn’t consider themselves to be “pillarized”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pillarisation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPk-efest5M&t=2276s

I think they aren’t quite the same: “buy 1 get 1 free” means that you only get a discount if you remove at least 2 units of inventory from the store. If I wanted to encourage people to clear out shelves in order to make space for new inventory (like an entirely new product or the same product but with more distant expiration dates), I might be inclined to use “buy 1 get 1 free” (or something like “buy 3 get 1 free”) rather than just reducing the base price: if someone only gets the discount if they help me clear the shelves it might make our incentives more aligned. A “buy 1 get 1 free” deal might also make it easier to reinterpret statistics: being able to say “we sold 100 units at a price of $2 for each unit (but there was a buy 1 get 1 free deal)” might be more useful than being able to say “we sold 100 units at a price of $1 for each unit”. Also, information about who took advantage of the deal and who didn’t might be interesting (based on what was bought at the same time or tracked with a “loyalty program”), but a constant discount doesn’t make that information available since it applies to everyone equally.

Regardless, there is a contrast between how I have interpreted the article and how I feel about the page as a whole.

The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment and has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.

a global wave of age-check laws threatens to chill speech

You’ve read your last free article.

I expect that they mean to express that they were not engaged with any political system in the past and don’t expect to engage with any party that already exists. It might also express that they will disengage from politics when they determine that they can stop addressing this particular issue (whether that is because the issue was solved or not). Perhaps it helps to be “not tainted by government or mainstream parties’ scandals” (or vice versa).

Consider your audience. “You are part of the problem” (meaning “I am the enemy of the person reading these words”) is probably not what you wanted to communicate. “Collective Shout is part of the problem” (meaning “The person reading these words should help to neutralize Collective Shout”) probably is. Addressing someone that you don’t want to engage in “diplomacy” with is probably a bad idea. You might want to use words such that you address people who you want to cooperate with.

Alternatively, one could go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melinda_Tankard_Reist#Video_games

I believe that it’s unlikely that many people outside of Afghanistan will ever meet an Afghan that isn’t a Muslim.

Almost the entire Afghan population is Muslim, with less than 1% being non-Muslim.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Afghanistan#Religion

Dorsey’s new open source messaging app, Bitchat Bluetooth-based

Does that already exist? https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/#briar I’m not sure how “decentralized” it is, but it is probably at least somewhat decentralized.

The face reminded me of the style of the face pictures for Psycho Patrol R. I doubt that any one picture is exactly the same, but the style is similar enough to remind me. https://shared.fastly.steamstatic.com/store_item_assets/steam/apps/1907590/ss_97de425d644d8a91b36a76e87a82ad9b647c95bc.600x338.jpg https://store.steampowered.com/app/1907590/Psycho_Patrol_R/

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor has lost access to his email, and his bank accounts have been frozen.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trumps-sanctions-on-iccs-chief-prosecutor-have-halted-tribunals-work-officials-and-lawyers-say

I currently see this URL provided by https://thebrainbin.org/u/@Pro@programming.dev and it is not identical: https://us.afpnews.com/article/?were-done-with-teams-german-state-hits-uninstall-on-microsoft,49PM3G2

This seems to be the same article, but uses a URL that doesn’t lead to a page that is essentially blank for me: https://us.afpnews.com/article/?were-done-with-teams-german-state-hits-uninstall-on-microsoft,49PM3G2

I recognize “Uni” the cat from https://youtube.com/@Unicouniuni3

I think that this video gave me the best insight into how China works nowadays, and I suspect things weren’t entirely dissimilar in the past: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1TeeIG6Uaw I also looked into things like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People’s_Congress and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Congress_of_the_Chinese_Communist_Party after starting from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China and it seems that things are pretty complicated. For example: Due to the temporary nature of the plenary sessions, most of NPC’s power is delegated to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC), which consists of about 170 legislators and meets in continuous bi-monthly sessions, when its parent NPC is not in session.

I think it’s possible that someone could have “died” but still be alive today (after being revived). Someone could truthfully say, “He died, but he’s not dead”. “Briton Audrey Schoeman revived after six-hour cardiac arrest”

My opinions are likely to be in accord with information found at https://www.privacyguides.org/en/desktop/ and https://www.privacyguides.org/en/android/distributions/

As an alternative to making decisions without direct assistance, you might benefit from contracting with another person to make decisions based on requirements you describe (essentially getting a chief information officer (CIO) for yourself). The main reason I’m suggesting this is that having more people involved will make it more likely that someone will know about established best practices relevant to your situation or that someone will have experience with a problem that is similar to the one you’re dealing with. Additional reasons I could provide for this would be similar to the reasons people give to discourage someone from handling court appearances without a lawyer or doing surgery on themselves. You might be able to use https://ryf.fsf.org/categories/laptops to find information about how to contact people about your computing needs. Alternatively, you could visit a store (for example, one operated by Walmart).