• Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, the fact that telegram normal/group chats are not encrypted is not true either. I think I know how is signal doing it, and I wish telegram upgraded it’s services, but for now it’s without any kind of doubt the most seamless chat service I have ever used, with the integrations, stickers and all that. I’ll give signal a try though, GL moving all the friend group chats though.

      • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        > Well, the fact that telegram normal/group chats are not encrypted is not true either.

        It’s not encrypted in any way that actually matters.

        > it’s without any kind of doubt the most seamless chat service I have ever used, with the integrations, stickers and all that.

        Yeah stickers are not high up on my list of priorities.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, for starters, Signal doesn’t have a web version so I cannot use it in managed pcs, bummer. In any case, I’ll check it out but I highl doubt that the user experience will be even close.

            • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lmao it’s not. It doesn’t have nearly the same stickers, no animated stickers, no reactions, no instant video messages.

              Encryption is not part of the user experience, that’s an underlying security messure that he user doesn’t feel. It’s important but it’s not part of the user experience.