• Dick Justice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        YES!!! I miss my Motorola Hint and my HTC Surround! The Xperia play, the Lumia 1020 even. All phones look the same now and they all do the same things. All you really pay for these days is a little more speed and a few more pixels but they’re 4 times the cost.

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because now a phone is just a touchscreen with a processor behind it. It’s up to the software developers to bring the value, and they don’t dare change that because any deviation will prevent the next flappy bird from running on their hardware.

      • MrBananaMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m glad they aren’t just copying the mainstream garbage. Change for the sake of change is a blight on the market.

      • ErikDegenerik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As someone who hasn’t paid more than 500€ for a phone I can only laugh at this. 1000 is still outrageous.

        • comic_zalgo_sans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if you are into the premium end of the market, I think the reality is that smartphones is a mature market now. They’ve been around since 2007, and even before that it wasn’t like every model was a nokia 3310, so we’re at the cumulation of 16+ years of iteration and for most people it’s well past the point of diminishing returns. So we see companies try new angles like foldables to keep the upgrade cycle going. Their main consideration is whether they can produce something to sell, and if they can do something their competitors can’t so the smartphone doesn’t become a generic thing entirely.

          Improving the camera has been a bigger draw for a lot of people so they have a high quality point and shoot constantly with them, or memory/storage, or screen size/resolution, or CPU, or battery life, and I’d assume that’s also getting to the point of diminishing returns.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly! I’m mostly hoping for a better camera, but I’m always interested in any new health features. I don’t upgrade watches bpvery often, but if they do deliver blood pressure sensors, I’m in.

            Admittedly my primary reason for upgrading phones this year is my kids. We’ve gotten into the habit of giving them our old phones (with new batteries) so we’re all relatively current but we only need to buy two new ones at a time and I’m not as upset if they break an older one. However Apple is dropping support for my kids’ current phones, plus the kids have been dropping the phones left and right, so it’s time. They’ll get phones that are still supported with updates and that have no physical damage yet, and I’ll get new and shiny

          • notapantsday@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In some aspects, cameras have even become worse. They started optimizing their software for the wrong metrics, which leaves you with heavily over-processed images that always look a little off. This can make otherwise boring images seem a bit more interesting, but if you’re actually trying to take good pictures, it can seriously ruin your shots.

            I think Sony is one of the few manufacturers that allows you to choose less aggressive processing.