Lyft and Uber say they will leave Minneapolis if the mayor signs a minimum wage bill for drivers::Lyft and Uber threatened to stop doing business in Minneapolis after the city council adopted a new rule Thursday that would set a minimum wage for rideshare drivers.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    280
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh no! Businesses whose ‘innovation’ is doing end runs around labour law, leaving? How sad.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      And whose business plan is to use VC money to undercut existing taxi services and drive them out of business so that they can increase prices to a profitable point (and beyond!).

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it wasn’t like the taxi industry was all sunshine and flowers before Uber existed. I cheered them on in the fight for a while before realizing they weren’t my champion but just wanted to replace the existing taxis with their own and had to hike up prices eventually because they were losing tons of money in the meantime.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      114
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “labor laws” you reference only exist to give taxi companies monopolies and provide worse experiences for everyone involved

      • CustodialTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        78
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean exist to ensure the underpaid actually get the legal minimum wage and to stop exploitive rich people from exploiting poor people?

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But it isn’t like a lot of taxi companies didn’t do the same thing to their workers.

          In most parts of the US, restriction of the number of taxis came from issuing a limited number of medallions. The owners of these medallions effectively became rentseekers, renting out their medallions to drivers. The system was rife with abuse.

          Part of the main issue now is that a lot of small rentseekers got taken over by two big ones.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Because it’s a custom minimum wage that only their companies have to pay, set arbitrarily to make shit like taxis more competitive.

              Yellow Cab fucking admitted in NYC that they only pushed the “Uber drivers make lower wages” rhetoric because they couldn’t compete, when in fact Uber drivers make what taxi drivers make.

              So now Uber just contracts out taxis, and gets their money anyway

              https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/24/business/uber-new-york-taxis.html

              But at least people have to pay more for rides.

              • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                How the hell does a minimum wage make taxis more competitive? That doesn’t make any sense. If uber drivers already make more than the minimum wage then a minimum wage would have no effect on that.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You should read the article, because it’s only a set minimum for those two companies, not a general min wage.

              • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted. I am in Portland and Uber & Lyft are so popular here that the cabs here mostly do medical transport for non-emergency situations. I use to be a dispatcher here for several years. All cabs did were go to various hospitals and doctor offices.

          • nbailey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uber & Lyft drivers assume all the financial risk and responsibility for their car payment, maintenance, insurance, cleaning, health and dental insurance, etc. You’ll find that once you factor in the externalities the tech companies push into their workers, they don’t necessarily make good money at all.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              1 year ago

              So do pizza delivery drivers and they make great money.

              • nbailey@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                They really don’t. When I was a pizza guy about ten years ago, after fuel & maintenance I would make the equivalent of about $12 USD per hour averaged over a month of full time work.

                And one big repair like your power steering pump can ruin the whole month. It’s a great way to “use up” the last of your car before you scrap it, but really not a sustainable job.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Weird because when I was a pizza guy, I made more than I did as a teacher

              • ZodiacSF1969@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah yes, pizza delivery drivers are well known to be among the highest income earners. Up there with doctors, I believe.

          • GravityAce@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uhh, Uber drivers are definitely poor… It’s just that taxi drivers are also poor…

            Plus, those figures are just averages. Did they take the median or the mean? Are the taxi drivers numbers more of a bell curve with everyone making similar amounts while the Uber drivers are either doing well or not doing well at all? My total guess based on no data whatsoever is yes but I’d be interested in seeing the data if you have it. MLMs use this same trick when they try to convince you their businesses are viable

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s weird that you think someone making more than 30-35% of the country is “poor”

              You’ll forgive me for not putting much stock in your “total guess” when you believe as you do.

              • GravityAce@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yup. Alot of poor people in this country… It’s been getting worse.

                Too bad you don’t know how those averages were calculated. Would have been interesting

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  18
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  A) it’s fun how I can tell you’re from a wealthy family

                  B) all averages are calculated the same way. That’s what “average” means. It’s literally a method of calculation.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Tell me you have rich parents without telling me you have rich parents.

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Still better than the ‘gig economy’. If making worker’s lives more precarious makes your life better, fuck your life.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s nothing preventing Uber, Lyft, or any other company from charging realistic rates to pay drivers a minimum wage. But if Uber or Lyft do this, their rates end up being more than traditional taxis, so the question is why

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Uber and lift drivers make more than minimum wage, and make basically the same income as taxi drivers, so I’m not sure what you’re even saying here.

          They cost less than taxis because they have less overhead.

          • Deiv@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If that was the case then this bill would be of no concern to them. In reality, only some drivers make more than minimum wage, not all

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s an additional charge just for those companies, not an actual minimum wage.

              Read the article.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nothing in this article disagrees with what I’m saying

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The Minneapolis City Council is trying to create a new minimum wage for drivers. Uber and Lyft drivers are not “already making” this. What are you reading?

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t say they were making the custom-built minimum designed solely to impact their companies, but rather that they make over the actual minimum wage

      • BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not all, they were kicked out from Hungary - although that was less a victory of workers’ rights rather than that of the taxi driver union.

        • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I noticed when I visited Vancouver, BC there were no uber’s or lyft’s available, however - uber eats was available. And most restaurants I walked past had uber eats signs in the windows saying they did delivery. And this was in like 2018

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          37
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every argument in this thread is basically taxi protectionism.

              • yokonzo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Kinda just sound like a conspiracy nut finding arguments where there are none with people who are just talking about the article

          • DudePluto@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Taxi companies tend to be smaller, more locally owned businesses with actual employees instead of “contractors.” Why would we *not side with them?

            Edit: missed an important word

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool, Columbus Ohio’s bus system offers a subsidized version of Uber and while it sucks in service area the idea and price both make perfect sense for Minneapolis to adopt.

    Rideshare apps aren’t the solution, effective and adaptive public transportation is. Public transit based rideshare is a great way to fill in the gaps of bus and train systems and to push them to fill their own gaps.

    And when all else fails, unionized taxi services.

    Sometimes Silicon Valley feels like the monorail man

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We criticize, but I don’t think public transit evolves in a vacuum. People obviously wanted systems like Uber and Lyft, looking at their popularity and mass adoption. I don’t think we can rely on public institutions to finance the risk to see if a market exists for every improvement though.

      • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Public transit is good where I live and I know it’s not good everywhere but I would so rather take the bus or train over uber and lyft. I only take ubers and lyfts if I have a coupon or I absolutely have to take one because its 3 am and there’s no other way to get home.

    • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sometimes Silicon Valley feels like the monorail man

      Just don’t look up what they’re planning to build for the airport connection in San Jose…

    • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Proper ride sharing would be awesome. It’s love if I could come to work by using an app to find someone going the same way as me and getting a lift.

    • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What assets? All they have is debt and maybe some servers. I guess the app and brand has some value, but only to another ride share company.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have corporate employees beyond the drivers. They likely have offices and such.

      • SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If we’re talking total fantasyland, I suppose put those employees to work building a government backed alternative or an open platform to allow smaller companies?

        Suppose you had a centralized federated system where states or municipalities or even companies could have their own drivers but it’s a common app?

        Edit to add you could also have both driver and passenger rate each other and allow both to filter by rating, lower ratings would naturally pay more or less to compensate for the service. I bet in cities you’d have luxury versions of the same services all from the same app, but also cheap shitty services too.

        • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The existence of Uber and Lyft does not prevent the government from doing this. If we are paying people to build and maintain this process we may as well hire people to do so. Taking over Uber would lead to the best employees leaving for other tech companies.

          • SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you’re underestimating how many people want to work for the government for the perceived benefits. I’m saying they have the stuff already set up, in fantasyland it would be a fairly smooth transition.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t own the cars, they don’t hire employees. We’d be left with an app? Some servers? We don’t need that stuff to run a decent public transportation service.

    • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better off seizing taxis and the cars they own, but ultimately, why would we do that? Pass legislation to make them comply

  • xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uber prices in some cities are absolutely insane. Seattle for example: Right now a ride to the airport from where I am is 13 miles / 25 minute drive. Uber is quoting $51 at 10am on a Friday. Minneapolis’ new minimum wage would only be $20.47. Even if the driver came all the way from the airport, that would still only be $41. Somehow I doubt all that money is going to the drivers right now.

    • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah and fucking forget getting away from an airport or train station with one - I think it was like near $90 for a lyft from LAX to my friends house within LA. Only like a 30 minute drive too. Which, where I live a 30 minute ride is like $20 or $30 ish.

    • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my city the government used a private company to build the rail to the airport and then have them exclusive running of it for a few decades. It makes sense to take a train from the airport but if you have two or more people it’s cheaper to take a taxi to the nearest hub and catch a train from there on.

  • Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck uber. Fuck lyft. We’d be better off if they didn’t exist. Destroyed livelihoods so silicon valley could seem like they were doing something and not just thieving from people.

  • Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    This mindset of catering to companies is infuriating. They took the risk creating the business, if they are no longer able to afford to pay wages or have competitive prices they don’t deserve to remain open. That’s the whole fucking point of the free market. Let these companies fail, the country and the economy will recover and new companies that fill current niches and needs will pop up.