Automated background removal was also added recently.

        • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          For how relatively well known it is (it’s probably like the next most well known piece of FOSS after Linux and Blender) I can’t believe how bad a piece of software GIMP is.

          • aksdb@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hope you mean the UX. I think attacking it’s functionality would be unfair. It does everything good and right … technically.

            If the UX is objectively bad or “just” subjectively might be hard to find out. I would assume if there are objective UX mistakes, some contributor might have been able to deal with that by now. But of course it doesn’t change anything if a majority doesn’t like it for subjectice reasons. It’s part of UX design to deal with subjective aspects.

                • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Or color spasecs other than sRGB (8 bits/channel). I’ve a camera that takes 10 bits/channel photos, a monitor that displays 10 bits/channel, etc. But GIMP will just distort the colors because they hard-coded the color space! Can’t edit for print either, no CMYK. GIMP is an image editor for the noughties, not the 2020s.

                  Then again, we’re talking about MS Paint here. If Paint fills your needs, GIMP will be fine.

                • aksdb@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not a professional either, but I was also curious and learned:

                  It’s a layer of which the properties/filters apply to all layers below. So you can basically try around and manipulate the visible image without having to combine the layers first.

            • Crul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’ve been waiting for years for “non-destructive edition” (AKA smart objects). It’s a fundamental feature that I use (almost?) always as a first step. IMHO a lof of professional work is not practical without it.

              They had it on the roadmap (see 2020 archive) for years marked as “No[t started]”. The current roadmap looks more promising with “link layers” marked as WIP and saying it could be available on GIMP 3.0.2.

          • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I use Gimp a lot.

            It does its job very well, but that job is not to be an alternative to photoshop.

          • gmtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I used GIMP before Photoshop and I still massively prefer GIMP.

            I really think its a case of what you got used to first.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Paint is not designed to be GIMP/Photoshop alternative. It is just a simple drawing program. Although it is great that they have finally added these long-awaited features, as I may finally move from paint.net, which is also great but it has one huge drawback - it is not a single window, which is a hassle.

  • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Screw you Microsoft, I switched to Paint.net forever ago and I’ll be long dead in the cold, cold grave before I recognize Missourah, I mean switch back to Paint.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      https://getpaint.net/

      Some other random company got the url “paint.net”, so confusingly you need https://getpaint.net/ to download the product paint.net

      For those unfamiliar, it’s a free art program that’s… idk 80% of what photoshop is? But you can install community-made plugins to add features (shoutout to Grim Color Reaper).

      Also on their download page, you want this one:

      If you do the microsoft link, you’ll have to pay microsoft. For a free product. That microsoft doesn’t own. Dafuq.

      The paid version from the microsoft store helps to support the product; however I suspect the devs will get more bang-per-buck if you DL the free version and make a direct donation at https://getpaint.net/donate.html

      • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The developer of paint.net sells it on the Microsoft store to support the product. Not any different than buying an app through the App Store or Google play store.

        It’s created by a Microsoft Engineer, not super surprising they leverage Microsoft tools to get paid.

      • lemmy___user@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can also use winget to install it, if you’re into package managers

        winget install --id=dotPDNLLC.paintdotnet -e

        That way you can still get semi-automatic updates

      • N1cknamed@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paint.net is great but it doesn’t even come close to 80% the functionality of photoshop. It’s more like 10%. The plugins are interesting but fairly limited in what they can do.

        I like to use paint.net for simple edits like cropping because of how lightweight it is, but as soon as I need to do any substantial image manipulation or drawing I’m opening photoshop. Paint.net will just hold you back. It doesn’t support some of the most common and basic features like masks, brushes, the pen tool and gradients.

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The single most historically aware yet still funny to the unaware joke that the Simpsons ever put out.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shouldn’t be too hard, I expect it to be a single executable stored in C:\Windows\System32 , much like the current mspaint.exe. Copy it over, run, have fun

        • EeeDawg101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wouldn’t surprise me if they lock it to the windows store. I hope I’m wrong!

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          10

          That’s where you lost credibility.
          Windows 7 was their last non-tracking OS.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t stop all tracking, a lot of it still happens in the background, only “without identification”. If you thought otherwise, I have this pristine Eiffel Tower for sale.

          • ex0dus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not 1 minute, you have to be technically savvy and run scripts from GitHub

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                30
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Given away? Windows is a paid product. And there are other (free!) operating systems that are not driven by profit.

                • The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  25
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve never paid for it. Most Windows 11 users have not paid for it. You can buy a license but they also gave it away to effectively everyone and anyone who wants to can run it without buying it so long as you don’t mind the “activate more” watermark and less appearance options

              • HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They make their real money on Azure iirc. And they’ve recently had a security leak of about 38 TB of data. Nice.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s still missing a handful of features from Windows10, which might keep some people from upgrading

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, I don’t hate Windows (unlike a lot in the Fediverse), but I wouldn’t say Win11 is awesome. It probably just works. From what I see it’s just a mildly-improved 10, which is nice, but missing a few things (no grouped task bar button option in my case), which is why I’m holding out for now.

      • omicron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Windows 11 is a much better experience for developers than Windows 10. I see a lot of people who just hate on it for no real reason other than it’s different.

        • TheyKeepOnRising@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m a dev and I hate Win11. I could list dozens of reasons why, but one that pisses me off daily is that they removed keyboard shortcuts from task manager for no goddamn reason. Alt+E is the shortcut to end process on every other Windows OS except Win11 because it was made with malicious incompetence.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those are great features and two of the biggest reasons I never bother with Paint. But locking them to Windows 11 and not putting them out on Windows 10 is some Grade A bullshit.

    • kaesaecracker@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I get why they do it though - any change to win10 needs testing and so on and might not be welcomed by the user base. You can always download a free (as in freedom) image editor, some are even on the Microsoft Store. Be glad they did not backport all the bad sides of win11…

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        They had no problem turning windows 10 into mock windows 11 despite what the userbase may think. I don’t think adding QOL updates to Paint is going to be met with furor.

    • youRFate@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they port new features back to a legacy OS, there is no reason…

  • Plap plap 𓁑𓂸 @lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a hobbyist digital artist and have had to do a handful of graphic design projects for my mundane, non-art-in-anyway job.

    As our computers are locked down Windows PCs, I’ve had to manage with MSPaint. It’s always taken me double the time as on any other program or app, and I have been wishing it had layers for years.

    Since this update is Windows 11 only, I’ll have to for my company to upgrade, so I can look forward to layers in maybe 5 years.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At least with layers support you can now extract the individual parts of the image.

      What used to drive me nuts is when they send me over everything in one image and I couldn’t separate the various components out.

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    meanwhile, wordpad… probably used by more people over the age of seven than paint is, getting axed.

    microsoft has office subs to sell, but they do not have a photoshop or gimp or even a paint.net alternative to sell.

    • MrLuemasG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve literally never met anybody that used Wordpad, whereas I know a lot of tech normies that’ll use MS Paint for quick memes and things

      • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used it back in my Windows days. Out of the box, I think it’s the only way to do rich text on Windows. Also (used to be anyway) one of the less resource intensive options.

        You know, for when you’ve got Napster, Winamp (with visualisation), ICQ, and MSN all up and barely running. You don’t want to have to run, like, WordPerfect at the same time! Your MP3s will start skipping :p

    • Classy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Notepad++ for a good while now and it’s proven to be a great alternative to MS WordPad.

      • private_account@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you format at all in Notepad++? I tend to use it for notes jot down in a rush or editing tiny scripts. For stuff that needs to look prettier, I tend to use Google Docs.

        • stringere@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes and then some. It has built in support for a lot of programming languages plus allows you to add more. It also support extended and regex find/replace.

    • kaesaecracker@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They created WordPad because of antitrust issues and never changed it. Try opening a Word document created by a recent version, it’s pretty useless today.

      Notepad rules though, it even got UTF8 support recently-ish! /s

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What did you think of the changes between Paint XP and modern versions? I used to adore Paint XP, but brush smoothing (though toggleable) and a clunky interface really spoiled the newer versions for me, and I don’t enjoy using them as much. I think I just became so used to the primitive way of drawing well in the old versions that it sort of became it’s own art form. Now they there are more advanced tools and so many required extra clicks, it feels like baggage. In the words of Karl Havoc, “THERE’S TOO MUCH FUCKIN’ SHIT ON ME!

      • jadegear@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you remove mspaint.exe then Windows will refuse to boot. It’s true, I knew a guy!

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jokes aside you can boot Windows without Windows at all. By that I mean you can boot Windows NT without Win32.

    • Lyrl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They did. I guess the community outcry was so loud even Microsoft had to heed it and reverse course.

    • Anders429@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought so too. I remember looking for alternatives for when it would be removed completely.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I honestly didn’t realize I had been installing it… I went to boot paint.net and was surprised I couldn’t find it on my work computer… that’s how critical it is… or how often I don’t change personal hardware

    • Piers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. Wordpad is the one being discontinued. Paint is one of several programs that can now be uninstalled from Windows by end users without any special tricks.

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read that WordPad also was being discontinued, in the same article stating the same about MS Paint iirc

  • WhyIDie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really do like it for something that I want to just add quick/small edits to, or something that can be slapped together quickly. But I do hope this isn’t the start of a trend to bloat mspaint and aim to compete against more robust image editors.

    The pessimist in me fears they’re going to, and start slapping on AI data harvesting measures that they’re integrating into Windows, like for training their own AI art generators. But this addition, in a bubble, is a welcome change.

  • Aielman15@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Very cool.

    I like Paint for its simplicity, and since I don’t need all the extra bells and whistles most of the time, I’ve never bothered with learning how to use Photoshop or GIMP.

    I’ve been using Paint.net for the last few years, but I’ll try the new Paint features as well and compare them to see which one I find better.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’m using paint.net for most of my editing (photopea for rest) but I would never have made the switch from just paint if it wasn’t for layers and transparency. Those are a big deal.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re probably using an instance/app where any two words with a dot in between them automatically gets turned into a URL.