ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoReady set godiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1754arrow-down111
arrow-up1743arrow-down1imageReady set godiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square31linkfedilink
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoDo you not have an internal experience?
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI don’t need to understand consciousness to be confident a llm is not conscious. Dogs are glorified barking machines. Is a tape playing a tape of a dog barking have the consciousness or intellegence of a dog?
minus-squareAlcoholicorn@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoProbably, their interactions with humans/dogs suggest they have a “theory of mind”. Mites? No.
minus-squareZos_Kia@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYou can’t prove that I do, I can’t prove that you do. Those metaphysical arguments don’t have much punch in a scientific conversation.
Do you not have an internal experience?
deleted by creator
I don’t need to understand consciousness to be confident a llm is not conscious.
Dogs are glorified barking machines. Is a tape playing a tape of a dog barking have the consciousness or intellegence of a dog?
deleted by creator
Probably, their interactions with humans/dogs suggest they have a “theory of mind”.
Mites? No.
You can’t prove that I do, I can’t prove that you do. Those metaphysical arguments don’t have much punch in a scientific conversation.