Just out of interest. How did you interpret my post that women can’t do science?
Women generally don’t just care. Same with cars and other engineering stuff. Does NOT mean women can’t do technology, nor that there are no female mechanics or engineers.
If you look a little deeper it appears they may be making a genuine observation. If the spelling is any indication of education it would suggest they may not know any women who care about science. If they really are discussing “resent” science headlines and they’re spelling recent incorrectly they are either teenagers, an adult male from a low socioeconomic area leading to poor education outcomes or a mixture.
It’s also possible the ‘headlines’ they’re discussing are cryptobro bullshit or that debunked pos that said women panic more about bad news than men. You start citing ‘scientific research’ that sounds like Tate’s wet dream, it’s gonna clear the room faster than cabbage farts
Exactly. For @random_character_a@lemmy.world , he doesn’t recognize the reason why women vacate the area around him. (For instance, he calls them “females” rather than women).
The reason why women vacate the area around him is because they can immediately tell he’s someone to avoid, and thus avoid him.
Sorry to say, but I haven’t met a single female who wouldn’t vacate the area if discussion turned to resent science headlines.
Reveals their sexism, misogny, ignorance, and believes women can’t be intelligent like men based on no evidence except what they believe.
Can’t even spell “recent” correctly.
Dropping this here: https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/17-top-female-scientists-who-have-changed-the-worl/
17 famous women, pioneers in science, who are much smarter than @random_character_a@lemmy.world
They might need this.
This list is far from complete. Emmy Noether, Babara McClintock, Ada Lovelace, Valentina Tereshkova…
Oh, I thought he usually engages in discussions about resenting science for some reason!
Just out of interest. How did you interpret my post that women can’t do science?
Women generally don’t just care. Same with cars and other engineering stuff. Does NOT mean women can’t do technology, nor that there are no female mechanics or engineers.
Cultural thing?
If you look a little deeper it appears they may be making a genuine observation. If the spelling is any indication of education it would suggest they may not know any women who care about science. If they really are discussing “resent” science headlines and they’re spelling recent incorrectly they are either teenagers, an adult male from a low socioeconomic area leading to poor education outcomes or a mixture.
It’s also possible the ‘headlines’ they’re discussing are cryptobro bullshit or that debunked pos that said women panic more about bad news than men. You start citing ‘scientific research’ that sounds like Tate’s wet dream, it’s gonna clear the room faster than cabbage farts
I think most people would vacate the area if you started discussing your resent of science. I’m guessing you’re some sort of religious fundamentalist?
Exactly. For @random_character_a@lemmy.world , he doesn’t recognize the reason why women vacate the area around him. (For instance, he calls them “females” rather than women).
The reason why women vacate the area around him is because they can immediately tell he’s someone to avoid, and thus avoid him.
They’re probably just vacating your area in general
I’m glad that you’ll never reproduce at least
Because women don’t RESENT science, duh
Yes. Grammar is important. Thank you.
I am clearly a retard and should ignore my posts from here on.
You’ve never met a woman. Unsurprising, and probably for the best.
Too bad your brain vacated your head
deleted by creator