Amazon Video Ad Push Seen Generating Extra $5 Billion in Revenue::Amazon.com Inc.’s push into video advertising will boost annual revenue by as much as $5 billion, according to a Bank of America analysis, mostly generated by new television-style commercials on Prime Video.

    • SeedyOne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Harder to do if you use Prime for other things. I’ve never watched a single Amazon video but I’m trying to source other purchase options locally so I can finally cancel the Prime shipping, which was saving our household money over the years. That said, if we can avoid it in the future we’ll stay off Amazon.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I pay yearly for Amazon Prime, and I still need the other stuff it provides.

      I would cancel just Prime Video if I could… but I can’t.

      • SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t provide anything. They already offer free shipping on orders above $25. If you insist on buying from them, just wait to buy stuff until you need $25 worth, then check out.

        • PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or… Just hear me out… One could not use Amazon. It’s easy for me to say, living in Denmark, where we can order from Amazon, but it’s not worth it. Everyone should boycott Amazon, considering they’re slave laborers…

          • SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m 100% with you. All for buying anything you can, not from Amazon. But for some people, especially here in the United States, Amazon has become the only option to buy certain items. Just trying to get people alternatives to paying $160 a year for a service that doesn’t really provide much of anything in my eyes.

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I admit I’ve not look into any numbers, if they are available, but I bet Amazon has an advantage of Prime customers that don’t have it primarily as a video streaming service. Those customers probably wouldn’t consider ads a big deal.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but they’ve maintained healthy profits regardless.

      I’m not defending the decision (I got rid of Netflix a long time ago), but they made it knowing full well that it benefitted their long-term financial outlook.

      Amazon is on the same boat as the other streaming platforms started since 2018: theyve sunk a ton of capital into building the platform to eat into Netflix’s market share, but they need to start monetizing soon otherwise their shareholders will get impatient with the liability still on the books.

      TL;DR; all these streamers are tanking the market with their competing services but as long as they can make more per user, they can do it indefinitely (but if ‘free’ alternatives continue absorbing users, then they’ll need to put the cabash on it, or else the entire market will go under)

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Narrator: “He was defending the decision”

    • triptrapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That MSN article has some numbers that don’t add up.

      The news is that the streaming giant is accountable for over half of the 4.4 million subscriptions lost in Spain alone in recent months…

      The analysis firm asserted that 1.6 million users have left the home of series like Stranger Things overall…

      The online streaming service had reported that it had added nine million new users, bringing its total number of subscribers to 247.15 million, during the most recent fiscal disclosure of data.

      Ignoring the fact that 1.6m isn’t “over half” of 4.4m, the last paragraph says that they added 9m new users. Am I reading this wrong?

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s 9m globally compared to the 1.6m/4.4m in Spain. They’re still adding new users in emerging market countries. I’d imagine the issue is that their users are falling off in their previously established markets (probably western countries, which I’m guessing make more money per sub too).

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s good. I was worried about Amazon’s profits. All those employees on food stamps. The company must be so broke!

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We killed Apple and kept Amazon. There is no streaming but commercial-free streaming, so it now needs to compete with the higher price tag.

    Soon it’ll be Amazon or britbox, and it’s not gonna survive that tribal council.