• Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t really think so.

    If you adjust for inflation, historically, it’s very cheap.
    If you compare it to movie tickets, which in essence is 2-3 hours of entertainment for $25, it’s the same story.
    Some games can give you hundreds of hours for close to the same price.

    This excludes games with monthly fees or predatory in-game systems.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      AAA titles have been $60 since the 90s iirc. The difference now, though, is the addition of paid DLC, micro transactions, etc that historically didn’t exist, so I’d say it’s a little bit of a toss up.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I always saw the higher $60 games were cartridge-based games, while the CD-ROM equivalent was cheaper. When everybody switched away from cartridges it dropped back down to $50 being the norm until around 2005-2006.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Really? I could swear that the top PS1 games were around $60. Granted this was about 30 years ago when I was a kid, so I could easily be mistaken, I just remember my parents bitching about them being expensive lol

              • Blackmist@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                In fairness that looks quite late on in the lifecycle of PS1.

                I remember games coming down in price later on, like they were around £45 and came down to about £30 for new ones.

                  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Yeah, they were called Platinum over here. £20 each. Ideal for a younger me, who could never justify full price games and frankly wanted to play the older ones first anyway.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I think “around $60” is still accurate. They’re above $50, and they still say that’s the price “*after coupon”.

    • Haru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is the comparison I end up making. Is it more up front? Yes, but will I get more hours out of it? Yes. Can I pick it up again without any additional cost? Yes. Can I be a goblin and not leave the comfort of my own house? Yes.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      $25

      You mean $2.50, right? That can’t be how much you pay for cinema tickets!?

      • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Our currency has taken a bit of a hit since covid, so I guess it’s more like $20 today.
        210 NOK when I checked my local price for Dune 2 just now.

        Add in some snacks and we’re way over $30, so hopefully my point still stands.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s mad, I can’t remember the last time I paid more than £5 to see a film