• HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    squatters rights precede the founding of the United States and have nothing to do with renters rights. You’re just wrong about why these laws exist.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re talking like a Sovereign Citizen.

      I’m talking about the very specific laws that prevent people from being evicted if they’ve been residing on a property for N months without following a very deliberate and drawn out legal procedure so that landlords cannot evict a family from their home of many years because of some missed rent payments or because they want to upgrade the place so they can charge more to a new tenant. Those are the laws that keep the sheriffs from just kicking down doors, at least in some states.

      I’m not taking a moral position on squatting. My friends and I squatted in an abandoned house while I was in high school, although most of us didn’t live there full time. If I noticed someone squatting tomorrow, especially in a corporate owned home, I would not have seen it. But the laws that I’m talking about were designed to protect tenants from having their lives unfairly disrupted, and I’m arguing that even if people are against squatters, we still need to protect tenants’ rights.

      I would have thought that was abundantly clear.