• eighty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can relate to the “how the fuck is being a concerned human being extreme/poltical?” energy in the post hard.

      • HomoScotian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s so exhausting, they treat it like a sport, it’s not about making anyone’s lives better it’s all just about their team winning

        • LlamaSutra@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s people creating their own victories because they’re lacking their own.

          Love your username, btw!

    • Drew Got No Clue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I despite this “trend” of considering just simple opinions and basic statements as “political”. It’s been watered down and turned into a meaningless tag.

    • caribou@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Politics used to be something people engaged in. Now politics is the core to a lot of people’s identities, which means disagreement or debate is perceived as a personal attack and people will embrace a tremendous amount of cognitive dissonance to avoid being wrong.

        • tubbytoad@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          All of human civilizations outside this recent small blip in history in the developed western world.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      What would you use for a synonym for based? I keep seeing that used. I always thought it was just some alt-right meme bullshit, but I’m learning I was wrong. I still don’t get the use. My mind always thinks “based on what?”

      • ott@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        “Based” is typically used to describe someone who says/does something without caring if they’ll be judged for it. Most commonly, it’s shorthand for “That’s a controversial opinion and you are bold for saying it, but I agree with you.” It turns the previous sentence into an adjective, which is a little weird but it makes sense eventually.

        So if I had to choose a single word as a synonym, I would say “Bold”.

  • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Linus gives exactly zero fucks about saying exactly what’s on his mind. And it’s almost always massively based. He’s always been great about that, we don’t deserve such a great mind.

  • Trash Panda@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hard fisagree. Linux isn’t political. Everyone has an opinion, it’s obvious Linus would too. But I am pretty happy that his opinion is one I personally agree with. Linux can be uaed by anyone though, and nothing stops far right activists (terrorists) from making a distro, which would still be Linux. There’s a heavily religious distro too, but that doesn’t make Linux as a whole religious.

    • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s a heavily religious distro too, but that doesn’t make Linux as a whole religious.

      More than one! There’s Ubuntu Christian Edition (if I had to guess, that’s probably the most popular one), Computers4Christians, there used to be Jesux (using the Christian Software Public License), Jewbuntu, Bodhi Linux, and (jokingly, but real) Kubuntu Satanic Edition at the very least.

      And, while not Linux, I have to mention TempleOS, the open source Christian OS designed by a schizophrenic who claims it was written to God’s specifications. It was written in HolyC and was just so out of place in 2005 when it was released.

      None of this matters in the context of your comment. I just wanted to throw it out there because I find the whole thing fascinating.

    • raresbears@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Does that really make it totally apolitical though?. Like obviously it’s not inherently attached to a wide reaching political ideology, but it still is political in the same way that any free software is kind of political.

      • Trash Panda@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Personally I disagree but that’s ok, we can’t all see it the same way :)

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think we get to use cold reason to determine if something is political or not, just like a dictionary doesn’t control the meaning of a word, nor does a small group of ants decide what the colony does next. If Linus came out as a right wing extremist, it wouldn’t matter how apolitical the linux source code is, people would decide to distance themselves from him and everything he represents. Something is political the moment a society perceives it as relevant to their politics.

  • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I half agree with his gun regulation stance. While ideally there would be more caution given to who owns guns that is unfortunately not the world americans have been living in the last 80 years or so. The fascists have guns, lots of them, and I’m not giving mine up while they have them.

    Everything else he said is 100% based.

    • Hexorg@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah the gun law regulators generally ignore the fact that everyone and their grandma already has guns. And those with guns are not willing to do trade in programs.

      I’d like to see better psych eval and requiring to re-license every so often. That should start steering the country in the right direction. Of course I don’t see this happening any time soon.

    • Lilium@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, yeah, fascists having guns is a “randomly giving guns to any moron with a pulse” problem.

    • rakkhun@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think fascists is going too far… they’re crazy and dumb, that’s it.

      • Venus@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nah, they’re fascists. Maybe not every republican, but a solid 70% or so of them. And a decent chunk of democrats too.

  • xenago@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Linus has always been political and principled, I mean he chose the GPL for a reason! Glad to see him state all of this outright though, it only makes me respect him more.

  • lemme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Did you know that linux kernel source code was leaked to the public? Go see for yourself how political it is!

    /s

  • DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Linus is stellar example of “good is not nice.”

    He will rake you over the coals because he cares about quality and expects better from everyone.

    • guyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good can be nice. This is just him personally and shouldn’t be seen as a guideline on how to be good.

      • DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree! Most good people are nice, it is complemntary after all.

        At the same time, without getting trite, being nice does not make people automatically good, and is often a performance to get away with vile shit.

        To paraphrase another idiom, people who are easily offended should be offended more often. People often dismiss others because they are not “nice” AKA not submissive or servile to their opinions or demands. Oh, this person is “mean” so I get to talk shit about them or ignore them.

        Yeah, not every good person is a good role model, one can always act better than the people they admire.