Porto881@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoCumlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10
arrow-up119arrow-down1external-linkCumlemmy.worldPorto881@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareCTDummy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoI though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
minus-squarenahuse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-28 months agoYeah, that’s what I mean. The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
Yeah, that’s what I mean.
The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.