• Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    shoutout to the person who reported this post with “Reason: Bot meme, you can’t even read it. whoever replies is a bot too” 😂

  • Skepticpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hmm. Self-organizing projects whose workers work on them entirely based on their need to be done, and the results freely distributed to anyone who wants a copy?

    Literal fascism, obviously.

    • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Things like FOSS stuff makes you think people can organize and work together freely to achieve a common goal, and maybe anarchy could work. But then, you see a busy intersection when the traffic lights go out and you realize the general public are idiots and everything devolves into selfish chaos as you’re stuck a half mile back, as cars shoot through in no particular order and you inch closer to the madness terrified to make your left turn. I have zero trust in society without some form of rule and order.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Think about a roundabout though in comparison, no lights or specific order, and there is a learning curve, but overall they reduce traffic better then stoplights under many conditions.

        I guess my point is sort of extrapolating that a structure/presentation also heavily influences how users perceive or use a product/idea

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          There is a specific order though.

          First two exits use the outside lane, second exit or anything further uses the inside lane. Always yield to the inside lane.

      • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Decentralization doesn’t necessarily mean disorganization. You can create a Lemmy instance with no moderation and rely purely on the community itself to self moderate, much like someone can create an instance with rules, and if someone disagrees with the rules they can create their own. Both are part of a decentralized system, so no one is actually coerced into participating in any system by regulation, just social pressure.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I find it a bit ironic that cars and traffic lights are being used as a metaphor for why anarchy won’t work. Let’s put aside that the example is of poor collective planning to build urban environments. Go to Vietnam and see how people drive without traffic lights, it’s complete madness. But it works, and in some ways it works better than what we have because the accidents are fewer and less severe while also serving more diverse modes of traffic.

      • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The same is true when attempting to merge in the US. See Japan traffic as a counter argument.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Anarchism isn’t zero organization. It’s organization for legitimate and accountable purposes.

        • linja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s a pretty weak definition. “Legitimate” especially is a vacuous term, and every form of democracy ever proposed is (theoretically) “accountable”.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Sure, but is that how we talk about our institutions? Things I hear that buck anarchism while supporting American democracy:

            • The Constitution should be interpreted with “originalism” or at the very least venerated
            • Police sacrifice X, therefore it’s okay if they do extralegal Y

            I’m not saying there aren’t systems of accountability that legitimize various institutions. It’s that the stories we tell to legitimize an institution comes in many different flavors, and those based on authority from power/position (ie “our founding fathers were smart people”) are not accepted by anarchists. Edit: Imagine how different our legal framework would be if it reflected that mentality?

            • linja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think I almost understand what you’re getting at. If I do, it’s uncodifiable. You can’t draft an organisational system with a clause that no one is allowed to use logical fallacies to defend it.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                If I do, it’s uncodifiable

                Things can still be codified and justified without an appeal to power. Lots of software is written that way today.

                a clause that no one is allowed to use logical fallacies to defend it.

                I don’t understand why that would be a necessity or desired.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      whose workers work on them entirely based on their need to be done

      You mean there’s projects out there where it’s not a bunch of individual devs all working on their personal pet features and ignoring all else?

        • linja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it is not. Certainly most projects aren’t solely personal utilities, but devs working for fun rather than profit will almost inevitably produce something skewed towards their own tastes and skills. See: the presentation of any FOSS graphical app vs a paid equivalent.

  • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Agile is the anarchism of software development: sounds nice on a high level but basically no theoretical foundation behind it and thus in practice everybody makes it whatever the fuck they want it to be.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There’s some theory and computer science behind parts. The value of peer review is evidence-backed. The idea that dev teams should self-organize is consistent with some varieties of management theory. Retros have been shown to have value, though the way they’re often done in Agile teams I’ve worked in has left much to be desired. Estimation with dimensionless points has zero evidential backing. The notion that the team should be able to set dates rather than having milestones imposed by management is, at best, woefully naive, since it presupposes a commitment by management that, in real life, few managers are willing to make. And in most cases where the shit has hit the fan, we later find that we needed more analysis, more planning and more design up front, rather than less. There are only certain application domains where you can get away with being as minimalist with those disciplines as Agile exponents claim you should be.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s plenty of theory to draw from, like the Cynefin Framework or Wardley Mapping. But like the left, there’s no real consensus on what we ought to be doing but no shortage of opinions.

    • verstra@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 months ago

      programming.dev does not get it. Can you explain?

      It is kinda obvious that maxist ideas are aligned with the open source ideas. Are they very much against commies?

      • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s some weird witch hunt going on against Dessalines on there. I don’t agree with him on everything, but them trying to hound him out for being a communist, whilst using software he made because he’s a communist is kinda funny.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Honestly I am dismayed we have this dumb ass reddit culture take hold. Not everything you disagree with must be bannned from the sub defederated immediately, your instance doesnt owe you a feed that’s exactly how you like it. Defederation should be the last resort, since it entirely breaks communication and interaction between the instance’s users.

          Instead, use the client side blocking features to clean up your feed. Personally I have blocked over 80 communities and users because they are centered around topics or beliefs I dont want on my feed, I blocked two instances as well, but I can still read their user’s comments and interact with their users outside the instances.

          Defederating is just splintering the fediverse. Unless at all avoidable it shouldn’t be done, in fact I chose my instance specifically because it defederates nobody but meta and illegal content such as gore and csam.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          I always saw open source as more socialist than specifically communist. Similar to volunteering in your community. Except the community is the whole world, and you don’t need to leave your house. Bonus!

          • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            To be honest I’d say it’s more similar to anarchism than socialism. Anarchism is voluntarist whilst socialism demands state power first. Both are ideally paths to communism* though so I’m going to say “communism” 'cause it annoys the most people.

            communism as in post capitalist, post state utopia, not Stalinism*

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          7 months ago

          Him being communist isn’t the problem, throwing his weight around unnecessarily is what is upsetting people. And he just keeps doing it. Like he just gets in a mood and decides to ban a bunch of people for fake violations they didn’t actually do. It’s all logged and people with high enough status can see the logs. He goes on tirades.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Not exactly. This started yesterday, when a user accused mods on .ml of, “tankie censorship,” (meaning censorship by tankies, not of tankies). He also came with some pretty good receipts that appear to show .ml mods removing criticism of China that, whether you agree with it or not, didn’t seem to violate any rules, and was well within the bounds of what most people would consider civil discourse. He also claims to have received bans from all of the .ml communities he’d ever participated in for pointing this bias out. It’s possible he’s presenting all of this with his own slant, but what he showed seems legit, and I’m not sure he could have provided more evidence without encouraging brigading.

        This is now starting to snowball, with users starting to call for defederating from .ml. One .world user also posted on .cafe about Dessalines previous tankie comments, while another user has posted about finding replacements for the largest .ml communities.

        So, saying what’s happing on .world is anti-communist isn’t accurate, as most the criticism has been anti-tankie. However, .world has a much higher level of liberals than most of Lemmy (they created a little echo chamber for themselves on Political Memes), and most of them are incapable or unwilling to understand the difference between a tankies and communists (or tankies and leftists…or tankies and criticism of Biden…). So, it will probably only be a matter of time before this group tries to blur the line between valid criticism of baised moderation from authoritarian apologists to general criticism of leftists.

        So, tl;dr: .world isn’t broadly anti-communist, but a large portion of the community is upset about what appears to be biased moderation from tankie .ml mods, and there is a small contingent of .world liberals who I’m sure will take this opportunity to bash anyone to their left.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The problem with this is that “Tankie” is a sliding target, including all Marxists. If you claim to only have a problem with Tankies, not all Marxists, but do your best to attack the majority of Marxists, does that mean the majority of Marxists are Tankies, or that .world has become an anticommunist instance?

          I’d say this will only end up creating a multipolar Lemmy. Dessalines has already stated that .ml will not be the first to defed, as they believe in an interconnected Lemmy. However, the target boogyman for .worlders has shifted from Grad, to Hexbear, to now .ml. After .world finally defeds from .ml, will they shift towards db0? Lemm.ee, perhaps? Who knows.

          This isn’t the first time this has happened, haha.

          • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Tankie used to have a specific and clear meaning

            But then people not in the know learned the word without caring what it meant

            So now it just means “guy that I think is an asshole (leftist beliefs optional but expected)”

          • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Wasn’t it .world that defed from db0 already (but later added it back) because of the piracy support? Or maybe that was .ee? When that happened I moved from that instance to here.

          • orsetto@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Honestly i wouldn’t mind. Users on .world that don’t want a butt load of defederations will probably (and hopefully) move to another instance, whilst the rest of lemmy will be free from all the liberals uncapable of discriminating between communists and tankies

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              And .world would be free of all the communists incapable of discriminating between communists and tankies. Everyone wins.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            I really only started to see the meaning of tankie start sliding once I got to Lemmy, and it goes in two directions; tankies who swear they aren’t tankies, they just have a lot of feelings about why the Uyghurs aren’t being mistreated, and liberals who literally think tankie is a synonym for leftist. (Seriously, if Lemmy has one unforgivable sin, it’s introducing the, “but her emails,” crowd to the word tankie.) Personally, I don’t care if I get tankies in my feed, but I’m not OK with instances that censor opinions they don’t like (I mean, assuming they’re not bigoted). Those mod logs are pretty damning, I’d like to hear from the .ml mods why they felt those weren’t legitimate discourse.

            Honestly, my real takeaway from this whole mess is that it’s really dispelled the myth of federation as a silver bullet for all of social media’s ills. Federation was sold to me as a solution to overly-large internet communities, since federation would stop single communities from becoming too powerful, and communities could simply be defederated if they didn’t get along. Meanwhile, .world is whining that .ml’s communities are too large and important to lose, while .ml is bitching that .world defederating would be egregious and unreasonable. The whole thing feels more like a flame war between some large subreddits than the glorious online utopia that I was told federation would bring us. Actually, it feels a lot like the schism that started when r/antiwork fell apart.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t think .ml is whining about .world defeding, more like thinking it would be goofy, but expecting it.

            • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I really only started to see the meaning of tankie start sliding once I got to Lemmy, and it goes in two directions; tankies who swear they aren’t tankies, they just have a lot of feelings about why the Uyghurs aren’t being mistreated, and liberals who literally think tankie is a synonym for leftist.

              This was already happening in Reddit roughly 2 years ago.

        • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          This isn’t an attack on your comment, which gave quality information, but I think it’s relevant to the conversations linked in your comment.

          Their definition of authoritarian is a contradiction to their actions and used subjectively. “I hate authoritarianism, so we should defederate to keep out the authoritarians.” This statement is supportive of a fundamentally authoritarian action.

          This is also why people who use the term “tankies” seriously are themselves deeply unserious. Their understanding of the topic is superficial at best and colored only by Western biases rooted in anti-communist propaganda. The concept of authoritarianism was itself a product of propaganda.

          Saying “no” is authoritarian. Holding elections is authoritarian. Authority itself doesn’t matter, what matters is who is in power and how they use their power to influence the world.

          Some people recognize and accept this reality and then openly support the power that best aligns with their own benefit.

          Anger at tankies is usually just a lack of class consciousness and ignorance based on a term that changes based on who you support and who you do not.

        • _donnadie_@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          there is a small contingent of .world liberals who I’m sure will take this opportunity to bash anyone to their left.

          They are very active though, and they don’t lose their chance to mention and antagonize .ml, which I think is kind of shitty. It happens even in threads where people are commenting about stuff unrelated to politics. lemmy.world is constantly looking for targets to defederate from.

          edit: I’d like to mention that I’m not disagreeing with you, I’m just giving my perspective on it.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh, yeah, they’re a very loud, obnoxious little group, and removing users that are only interested in picking fights is perfectly valid. But the screenshots from the original post really only seemed to be talking about China’s censorship of Tiananmen Square, and while it’s impossible to say without of context, their tone really didn’t seem to be combative. They just seemed to be expressing opinions about China that didn’t align with the .ml mods’ beliefs, and that’s troubling.

            What’s more, Dessalines gave a response that’s kinda telling about all this. A user called .ml out on censorship (in a very respectful tone), and Dessalines basically replied saying asking questions is OK when it’s done in good faith, but a lot of people only ask them to start fights. When the user replied that he was actually talking about people being censored for expressing opinions in good faith that run counter to .ml mods beliefs, Dessalines chose not to reply.

            I really seems like .ml wants to remove opinions that run contrary to the mods beliefs about communism. If that is the case, fair enough, but then maybe it does make sense for instances that don’t moderate that way to defederate. I don’t want to worry about policing myself on a bunch of the communities in my feed because I might get banned for my opinion on a news story.

            Maybe these fears are unfounded, and this whole thing is being blown out of proportion, but none of the .ml mods have addressed the original post yet. Dessalines has left several comments on the Ask Lemmy post Are You a Tankie, but he’s chosen not to reply to the censorship claim. Given the silence, I have to assume the worst.

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          He also came with some pretty good receipts that appear to show .ml mods removing criticism of China that, whether you agree with it or not, didn’t seem to violate any rules, and was well within the bounds of what most people would consider civil discourse.

          but what he showed seems legit, and I’m not sure he could have provided more evidence without encouraging brigading.

          Based on just your link, it just kinda looks like he was posting unsourced gore. That doesn’t feel like civil discourse to me.

          I don’t really see any criticism being removed. If Katana314’s message was congruent with reality it would count, but otherwise just making accusations isn’t criticism.

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I love being able to block individual people. I’ve seen much less “pro-Biden a vote not for Biden is a vote for Trump” political compass meme shit lately because of that.

            • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              You support a candidate that is supporting a genocidal regime. You support genocide.

              Wish granted!

            • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Do you think trump is going to accept being declared the loser this time?

              Last time some people tried to reverse the election results.

              This time they’ve got a plan to harness the administrative states power once they get the presidency. Do you think there hasn’t been an equal amount of planning what to do to stop the steal a second time?

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            You better block me as well. I don’t know why we should help support Bibi’s favorite candidate by doing exactly what Repubs want and voting for someone who barely broke 1% of the popular vote. I guess people really want more far-right theocratic judges who are blatantly unqualified and corrupt?

            • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’ll bite. The democrats aren’t listening to us, we have two options: not support them in the election or (it was surprising to see this one end up in the news recently) an appeal to heaven.

              If you think trump is too much of a threat, that the president we already had will destroy democracy and there won’t be a 2028 election, that the most important thing is to keep out a candidate who didn’t accept it the last time he was declared the loser of an election and has had four years to prepare for this one as evidenced by project 2024, stop trying to get people to vote for the democrats and start stockpiling ammunition and training to oppose trump supporters in the streets instead.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                SCOTUS is right now still somehow deliberating on whether a president is allowed to Night of the Long Knives or not. SCOTUS is already taking away rights from my friends and neighbors. You may be privileged enough to pretend it won’t affect you, I guess.

                You think you aren’t being heard now, it isn’t going to improve under a fascist regime that ends voting with their Project 2025 shit. Have you not been paying attention to how Repubs have dealt with protesters? Yeah, becoming an armed insurgent would be the only option for change remaining once it gets to that point.

                That’s cool, though, you do you.

                • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Wait, the unelected branches of government are restricting rights of minorities and giving power to the executive branch now but we won’t have fascism to fight against until this one guy wins an election?

                  What happened last time he wasn’t declared the winner of an election? What makes you think that wouldn’t be a concern this time around? How do you square that with the degree of preparation that went into project 2025?

                  Let me make my thesis crystal clear: if you believe that trump will usher in American fascism and you recognize that he won’t accept the results of the election, you don’t need to get people to vote for Biden to make sure the results of the election aren’t in favor of trump, you need to prepare to physically confront trump supporters in the streets with guns and training to prevent a for real this time coup.

                  I’m not saying that to get you to go out and buy an ar-15 and a plate carrier (although you should, theyre not getting any cheaper), but to get you to recognize the absurdity of holding all those beliefs together.

            • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Your Savior, Genocide Joe, had the ability to put more people in the Supreme Court but he didn’t. Stop with the bullshit.

              You support genocide.

              Wish granted.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Thought you were blocking us? Keep helping Bibi’s preferred candidate, great work. When the killing accelerates even faster you can pat yourself on the back.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        .world is basically Reddit 2, but filled with the most radical liberals that specifically want to not be exposed to leftist instances, even db0 has a tenuous relation with them.

        .world is constantly on anticommunist witch hunts, and now that Lemmygrad and Hexbear are not visible to them thanks to defederation, .ml is the last large Marxist-aligned instance they can see, so it’s the new boogeyman.

        One of them tried to tell me Lemmy is Capitalist because posting is value, lmao

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Which part? Posting being value? They tried to use Marx’ Labor Theory of Value to say that because admins aren’t decided democratically, and posting is labor and therefore creates Value, Lemmy is Capitalist.

            This is, in fact, ridiculous, because Lemmy has a Use-Value but no Exchange-Value. Posting isn’t labor, and anyone can fork it.

      • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Are they very much against commies?

        We’re not, OP is just butthurt about Their Guy™ getting publicly dunked on for tankie branded censorship

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Cool, then unblock Hexbear and Lemmygrad.

          You can’t have it both ways, either you’re against Communism or you aren’t, and blocking every overtly Communist instance makes it obvious.

          There’s nothing wrong with running things how you want to, but please keep a consistent line or this drama will just move on to a new target, like dbzer0 after .world finally commits to defederating.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Is that why Hexbear and Lemmygrad were blocked? Hexbear being one of the largest and most active overtly trans-positive instances, and Lemmygrad being the largest explicitly Marxist Instance?

              You’re just calling them pedophiles now rather than even entertain the idea that .world just doesn’t like Communists.

              You’re treating Communism like liberals treat gay people, fine and supportive until they actually have to see gay people and complain about representation in TV and movies.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Is that why Hexbear and Lemmygrad were blocked? Hexbear being one of the largest and most active overtly trans-positive instances, and Lemmygrad being the largest explicitly Marxist Instance?

                Blocked for being antisocial? Yes. If it was about being trans then Blahaj would have been blocked a long time ago.

                If anything, I’m complaining about bad communist tropes dominating the media representation, and by that I mean leninists.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  It isn’t a trope if the vast majority of Marxists also agree with Lenin worldwide, lmao.

                  It’s blatantly anticommunism, not just because people are “antisocial.” You’re like a republican with a token gay friend that complains about the LGBTQ community dominating everything these days, lol. It’s sad, just own up to being anticommunist.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              What separates a Marxist from a tankie? Are Anarchists tankies?

              There are no .world communities for Communism, Socialism, or Marxism, so all of the Marxists who wish to contribute must do it on instances like Lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad.ml, Hexbear.net, or dbzer0. Lemmy.world deliberately blocking their users from contributing or even seeing Hexbear or Lemmygrad, and possibly soon even Lemmy.ml, is censorship of Marxists from its own users.

              Or is there a secret commie gathering in .world I don’t know about?

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  What Marxists get the pass, and which don’t?

                  There are no .world communities for Communism, Socialism, or Marxism, so all of the Marxists who wish to contribute must do it on instances like Lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad.ml, Hexbear.net, or dbzer0. Lemmy.world deliberately blocking their users from contributing or even seeing Hexbear or Lemmygrad, and possibly soon even Lemmy.ml, is censorship of Marxists from its own users.

                  Return2ozma got banned on Lemmy.world for criticizing Biden.

                  Or is there a secret commie gathering in .world I don’t know about?

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes FOSS is communism, spontaneously arising under capitalism, requiring zero bloody revolutions.

    Marx was right about the need for people to be nice and give things to each other, but he was wrong about it being necessary to destroy capitalism before this happened.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      FOSS isn’t communism, Foss hasn’t eliminated class relations. Using an free open source library to make more money for your boss isn’t communism. While I love FOSS, it’s definitely not communism.

      Marx never said people aren’t nice and don’t give things to each other under capitalism as far as I know, where are you taking that from?

      And the existence of FOSS is reliant on a few key sectors which capitalism could very well destroy or mutate into something much different than what they are now. I don’t see far-fetched the idea that the entire physical infrastructure of the internet will one day be privately owned, and companies will be able to decide who takes part and who doesn’t, what kind of content is allowed… The fact that the capitalist overlords still haven’t eliminated it, doesn’t mean they possibly can’t.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      he was wrong about it being necessary to destroy capitalism before this happened

      I thought it was more that (using modern terminology) he viewed socialism as an emergent phenomenon that would arise due to the unresolved contradictions within capitalism. So socialism doesn’t require the destruction of capitalism in order to start, it’s more that once it emerges, it’ll supersede capitalism. The Leninist approach of destroying the old order, then building the new one at gunpoint didn’t work all that well (to vastly understate), leading to a long period of totalitarian state capitalism, where workers had no control over the means of production (which is the main attribute Marx ascribes to socialism) and degeneration into nationalism, imperialist nostalgia and cronyism.

      But so far, along with failed revolutions hijacked by totalitarians, the main thing we’ve seen is that spontaneous emergence of working, non-coercive socialist organizations such as co-operatives has been met with strong and sometimes murderous opposition from the incumbent capitalists.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Marx believed this unresolved phenomena would lead to violent revolution, Lenin only added his analysis of Capitalism’s evolution into Imperialism, and his theory of Revolution, which focuses on the idea of the most radical workers forming a vanguard to bring the other workers up and help direct them. Marx believed the Revolution would happen and from it Socialism would emerge, hence him advocating for “siezing the Means of Production.” He also pointed directly to the Paris Commune, a hostile takeover of government aparatus, as the Dictatorship of the Proletarait he advocated for in action.

        Lenin wasn’t just “hey, let’s ignore Marx and do this at gunpoint,” it was more “hey, let’s listen to Marx, and do this at gunpoint.” Lenin actually addresses this utter de-fanging of Marx in bourgeois society in the opening section of The State and Revolution:

        “What is now happening to Marx’s theory has, in the course of history, happened repeatedly to the theories of revolutionary thinkers and leaders of oppressed classes fighting for emancipation. During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it. Today, the bourgeoisie and the opportunists within the labor movement concur in this doctoring of Marxism. They omit, obscure, or distort the revolutionary side of this theory, its revolutionary soul. They push to the foreground and extol what is or seems acceptable to the bourgeoisie. All the social-chauvinists are now “Marxists” (don’t laugh!). And more and more frequently German bourgeois scholars, only yesterday specialists in the annihilation of Marxism, are speaking of the “national-German” Marx, who, they claim, educated the labor unions which are so splendidly organized for the purpose of waging a predatory war!”

        As for the USSR, it wasn’t totalitarian. Workers did have control, there were no real bourgeois elements, no competing markets, and the state was not an “other” compared to the Workers. They had democratic measures in the form of Soviets, and the consequences of this were free education, healthcare, high home ownership rates, and so forth. Was the USSR perfect? Absolutely not, but it was history’s first major attempt at Marxist Socialism, and we can study it for that. The revolution wasn’t “hijacked,” it was led by the Workers and continued to be until corruption took hold over time and the USSR collapsed, being hacked up and sold for parts as a part of “Shock Doctrine,” plumetting life expectancy, GDP, and causing 2 million excess deaths.

        Co-operatives are met with hostile action because it’s easy to crush them when you have the state and monopoly on your side, hence why they will never likely be a leading force for Socialism within Capitalism, even if they should still be supported by Socialists everywhere.

    • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s half way to self management.

      Software exists in a world that kind of exists outside of property. Cynics like to think that Agile got big because as some kind of fad because the kids love it, but the reality is that fully hierarchical models just cannot keep up with self organising teams.

      The old model - the model that most of the rest of the world of work still uses - simply cannot compete on a level playing field where the means of production (a cheap computer) are available to all. A landowner can stop you building your own house, but Microsoft can’t really stop you building your own software, so they still have to put in work to collect rent.

      Imagine what we could accomplish as a species if the goals and distribution of resources were also decided democratically.

        • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          My point isn’t actually about the software.

          Agile is a limited form of workplace democracy that succeeded because the usual forms of disciplining workers couldn’t be enforced to stop it. It’s taken off in software because the outlay for software is so low that people can just quit their jobs and start a rival project with preferable working conditions. It’s stuck around because it’s significantly more effective than dictat.

          I have problems with agile too. A lot of the “ceremonies” seem more like cult rituals and bad practices are often assumed to be self justifying when they should be interrogated. (I once had a bust up in the office because I insisted in creating a future proof test framework instead of writing just what’s needed at the time. I was overruled and I’m still mad about it).

          So I guess my point isn’t even about the specific agile practices either.

          The point is that workers are able to self manage when they’re allowed to, and agile has accidentally proven this to be the case. Other work places should adopt some of these ideas. And these ideas should be pushed further, into business decisions and HR and management. And physical communities etc. all the way up to actual government.

          • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Interesting perspective, never really looked at it like that, I’ve always just interacted with the corporatized bullshit implementations of Agile.

            It seems Agile really did have a kernel of worker self management in it but the original people behind it didn’t have the right ideological framework to realize that this is what they’re trying to achieve.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        As I’ve been putting it: software is made of labor.

        Unfortunately the actual reason Agile got big is that the cult of MBAs saw daily meetings putting scores on estimates and absolutely creamed their slacks.

          • inlandempire@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            Français
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah haha it’s really weird and I tend to switch between the “normal” way and the “french” way without noticing. Basically in french the rule is that if your symbol is “tall” ( ! , ? , brackets, semicolon, I think dashes as well…) it needs to be preceded by a space

      • Prox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        What a shit measure. A key idea is to fail fast and fail often, as this leads to faster growth through more frequent (re)assessment.

        SW companies only care about profit. If failure rate is 268% higher but profit is simultaneously 10% higher, then Agile is the better choice.

      • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        What is impact engineering though? If it’s it’s just agile while being cognisant of technical debt over MVPs, I don’t know if it’s necessarily that different.

        It seems the study was designed to sell a book and I can’t find anything about what that book says. I should probably read it but the bait way it’s being sold makes me resistant to paying to find out.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The goddamn article you yourself posted as the proof mentions how it’s an ad right at the top

        Even though the research commissioned by consultancy Engprax could be seen as a thinly veiled plug for Impact Engineering methodology, it feeds into the suspicion that the Agile Manifesto might not be all it’s cracked up to be

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    But it’s not “from each according to his ability”. FOSS is what people feel like contributing. And it’s not “to each according to their need”. It’s take it or leave it, unless someone feels like fulfilling requests.

    Traditionally, the slogan meant a duty to work. Contributing what you feel like is just charity.

    Capitalism, at its core, is private control of the capital. Copyright law turns code into intellectual property/capital. I’ve read the argument that copyleft requires strong copyrights. That argument implicitly makes copyleft a feature of capitalism. You know how rich people or corporations sometimes donate large sums to get their name on something, EG a hospital wing? That’s not so different from a FOSS license that requires attribution.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    FOSS works with the quoted text for the same reason piracy is not technically stealing. How do you make the quoted text work with physical goods or services? How do you allocate the work of a cosmetic surgeon, or distribute nail polish?

    Edit to give examples that are more cis male oriented: how do you distribute viagra in an equitable manner? Basically I am asking where do non-utilitarian services or Veblen goods fit into this paradigm. Technically we don’t need computers to survive and mate, so that mitigates the need for FOSS

    • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      fuck if i know, i grew up in a capitalist world and live in it i can no more imagine how a communist society would work than a slave in ancient rome could imagine our wold. All i know is that its a good ideal and that it is good to move in that direction, maybe we cant have “from each according to their abilities and to each according to their needs” right now but we can atleast have “from each according to their abilities and to each according to their labor” and a basic floor to ensure no one lives in inhuman conditions and then maybe in a few generation people have some ideas on how to achieve the ideal or atleast get closer or maybe they discover an even better ideal idk i cant know, what I know is that capitalism is fucking garbage.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        a basic floor to ensure no one lives in inhuman conditions

        I am not an expert on political or economic theory, but I think the reason we don’t have consensus on the above is a philosophical issue. A confounding factor is that some people often confuse their greed-induced cognitive distortions as well-reasoned justification for whatever they do. But besides all that, it seems countries with market socialism are faring quite well till now, and I think are probably a good model for other economies.

  • MinekPo1 [it/she]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    to be fair , neither the free software movement nor the open source movement (which are distinct ideologically) are explicitly socialist . in a way , especially the free software movement , they embody an extention of liberalism .

    both of these movements focus on the individuals freedom and take issue not with developers/companies being systemically incentivized to develop closed source / nonfree software , but with individual developers/companies doing so . thus the solution taken is limited to the individual not to systemic change .

  • squid_slime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    All this “communism is fascism” bullshit is as toxic as “if you vote for 3rd party your voting for trump”.

    Fucking liberals.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      The vast majority of criticism towards .ml and others come from them being tankies, not communists. I’m a communist, by which I mean I want society to overcome social classes and hierarchies, and therefore, defending authoritarian states with hierarchies where the people on top enjoy political and economic privilege is contrary to communism.

      • sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So you’re a communist that denounces every communist project atop an ivory tower, instead of understanding the realities of actually building a socialist society (no magical button that will make us overcome hierarchies overnight, I’m afraid). Sounds like you’re just larping about being a communist

    • DriftinGrifter@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      i agree but voting 3rd party is the same as nit voting because you only have 2 realistic options which makes it more likely for trump to become president than if you voted for biden (also fuck tankies)

      • squid_slime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Continuing as usual is defeat. The more votes for 3rd party the more broken the system will look, with this a campaign for real change could take place. Instead you want to bury your head in the sand.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          The real change that will take place is Project 2025. They are not the ones with their head in the sand.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Isn’t “communism” essentially authorianism? I’d love to see true communism in action but humans tend to be too flawed to give up all that power.

      • squid_slime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Communism can be flawed and a flaw it is, but let’s not forget that capitalism imposing indignity is capitalism working perfectly and is not a flaw. We reward greed.

        So with this communism if used correctly can lead to prosperity.

        I would like to point you towards reading about the transitional period, its an important part of communism and also reading about internationalism, essentially its very hard to move from a greedy society to communism and equally its hard to be a communist country while surrounded by greedy countries.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Airlines can treat people like shit because it’s not a free market. If anyone who wanted could start up their own airline, they’d be a lot more consumer-friendly by necessity.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        According to Marx communism is a scenario of complete freedom.

        It’s the socialist state that is authoritarian.

        I think Marx’s idea is to actively burn away the old and then the new grow spontaneously. I think he’s wrong, since the old is a result of spontaneous growth already, but that’s the theory at least.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Authoritarianism is an empty label since it’s used against one’s opposing ideologies. Rarely if ever is the inherent authoritarianism of the current or any system of government acknowledged.

        • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Understandable. But how does a government choose the label, in this case, communism, when the it’s governed by a very small group of individuals and in most cases against the will of the people?

          • squid_slime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The governing body is the vanguard which is to downsize overtime and the country is to eventually shift to a worker lead government. It would be anarchy to deploy communism without first building the systems to allow for a workers lead government, especially off of the back from a greed riddled society and like wise surrounded by greed riddled capitalist countries.

            I should also so that mention communism isnt often implemented against the will of the people, Russia pre communism was an awful place, low literary, low life expectancy and the working class/ peasantry were exploited by the west and ruling class. They had a long bloody civil war and held strong. Then after which things slowly improved under communism.

            • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m definitely not an expert on this. But let’s take foss as an example. I find it to be an amazing bottom up community that contributes to itself freely. I can’t imagine how a top down system would flourish if a small group of people decided what was good for the foss community and deleted what they thought wasn’t. Is there is a distinction? Is there different versions of communism I should check out?

              • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                There’s hypothetically a bunch of different version of communism for everyone. The thing is, Marx described the problems with capitalism, and some vague sense of what socialism could be, some guidelines of what it should aim for, then kind of left the details up to each individual society to get there how they think is best based on their individual material conditions. He gave his own guesses, but didn’t think he could predict that part fully, it would be up to the people of the future to figure it out and build on. A third world country, rural serf based near fuedal society, like Russia, would have completely different needs from some post-industrial country, like if Germany turned communist, for example. If the world’s sole superpower, the US, turned communist, it would probably be a lot different than communist countries that had to transition under siege neighboring imperialism, like Cuba, North Korea, or Vietnam.

                This is just to answer your last question. Don’t think this really addresses your other questions, but just wanted to explain that part, as I’ve had it explained to me before. But I generally agree with you. There should still be some form of democracy but it might look different than what we are used to here in the US or liberal west.

              • squid_slime@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Its called worker lead, classless society.

                foss has a legally binding licence to support itself, this licence can be seen as a vanguard as it steers and protects the software, without the licence people would be sure to steal and monetise others works. But let’s say Foss became the defacto, everyone releases free fully open and no anti feature software, we could loss the vanguard and naturally a classless system would be present.

                • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Could a non-human vanguard be possible for a broader scope of governance? I don’t trust humanity all that much when it come to dictation.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh, in that case it’s a Democratic Republic of the Free People. The label the government chooses for itself might not be accurate according to political science.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        “Communism” is always going to be authoritarian if by “communism” you mean a government that attempts to control the whole of society. If by “communism” you mean a society where private property (not personal property) is democratically managed, that has nothing to do with authoritarism. Nor with the Soviet Union, or China, for that matter.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Communism is a free market scenario, just in gift economy form.

      It’s the centrally-planned socialist intermediary system that has produces the hell on earth we associate with fascism in the past.