• sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    6 months ago

    If something requires an “app” and a connection to “the cloud” for basic functionality, don’t buy it. This sort of abandonment by the manufacturer will always happen. Maybe it will last longer. Maybe it will be next week. But once the company has your money, the last thing they want to do is to spend any of that money providing you with support.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      The funny thing about this is that the first time I had that moment of realization was when I got the Sphero BB-8 toy from my kids for Christmas. It had a dedicated app. The reason it’s funny is because, out of all the things that I own, it’s the only app-driven one that still works. Sphero just merged it into their main app. Once that app stops getting updated, this toy will cease to work despite everything about it being functional. ☹️

      • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        As long as you can side load a functional apk to a supported Android device, it should work, no?

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          Android eventually locks out apps designed for older APIs. I remember reading about a bunch of abandoned apps being dropped from the Play Store for that reason. Not sure if that’s just the Play Store though or if it is the Android OS itself. I haven’t ever kept a phone beyond the manufacturer providing security updates since I actually use my phone for secure things.

          • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You have to enable developer mode and install with --bypass-low-target-sdk-block now.

            Dunno if they’ll remove that eventually

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Don’t say that so loud.

              You’ll have the self-proclaimed “power users” that just copy things they see posted without knowing what it does or possible issues and side effects, doing this and then complaining about issues stemming from it. And never disclosing they did it, blaming it on the system as a whole, ignoring the bypass they did.

              Oh wait, this isn’t the Windows community.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not sure but that’s a potential solution. You’d have to find the older APK somewhere but I feel like it should work since it’s just a Bluetooth connection to the toy.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is why i am for mandatory open sourcing of abandonware. So much stuff just laying wasted that could be hacked.

        But allowing you to diy your own toys might make you consume less and thats bad or something.

  • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    hearing about shoes that need an app makes me want to stab myself in the testicle.

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    TIL about self-lacing shoes… What a waste of fucking resources. Might as well add some flashing red lights at the back of the soles if you already have batteries in them.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lights in shoes that blink at each step were all the hype in my childhood

    • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honestly if they got the cost down and figured out a better interaction mechanism than an app, I could see it being useful for older or disabled individuals.

      For example, imagine someone is 55. They are still with it, and decently active for this age. However they have arthritis in their hands that makes tasks that require dexterity mildly uncomfortable. These kinds of shoes would be a pretty big boon for them in terms of staying active.

      The issue is that they tried to make it some cool fashion accessory for Gen Z sneaker heads to buy.

      • Shimitar@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Man, at 55 I will be still running ironman’s… Hopefully. And trails. Let’s keep arthritis for the 70’s, shall we?

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I know a few people in their 40’s with varying stages of arthritis. I’m hopeful for post 70’s as well, but it’s not looking too good.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They have buttons on the shoes too. Still, having a battery for something like this is just wasteful and pointless. People with disabilities have already several unpowered alternatives that work perfectly fine and as mentioned, those things are clearly not designed for that purpose in mind anyway.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Allowing these companies to ever sell anything with the “cloud” marketing was a colossal mistake. Not only it was a waste of people’s money, but now also e-waste

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    In a world where I can slip my shoes on and off without untying them, why would I need shoes that can self-tie?

    • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Probably overkill and possibly even overly complicated for an MCU.

      This probably just requires some good old reverse engineering the original apps bluetooth API and an app to connect to the shoes.

      If they’re really lucky, it’s simple unencrypted packets they can just capture via Wireshark, but I really haven’t looked into it any further than this article summary, so I could be wrong.

      If if they can work by simple packet replay, that would be the most simple, and definitely doable by the Flipper.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Despite the ongoing popularity of the Back to the Future trilogy that inspired the self-lacing tech found in the HyperAdapt 1.0 and Air Mags, Nike has announced that it’s “no longer creating new versions of Adapt shoes.” Now, the Adapt BB mobile app used to control the $350 third iteration of Nike’s self-lacing sneakers will disappear from Google Play and the iPhone App Store next month.

    Without the app, owners can use the physical buttons on the sneakers to power them on and off, check battery status, tighten or loosen the laces, and save a single preset, but there will be no way to adjust the shoe’s lighting.

    The power laces on the Nike Adapt BB basketball shoes, which were worn by athletes like Jayson Tatum and Luka Doncic, were adjustable using buttons on the sneakers themselves or over Bluetooth.

    Nike’s decision to retire the app is another reminder of the challenges of designing smart apparel.

    Most consumers might be used to the idea of upgrading a smartphone every few years, but an electronic pair of shoes or a smart denim jacket can remain in someone’s wardrobe for decades, long after a company stops selling the product.

    It’s not entirely surprising when a company chooses to stop paying for the upkeep and continued development of an app for a product it’s no longer making money on, but that doesn’t take the sting out of losing functionality on your five-year-old kicks.


    The original article contains 318 words, the summary contains 240 words. Saved 25%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    To be fair, anyone who thought their life needed SaaS supported shoe laces, definitely had this coming.

    In terms of cosmic corporate evildoers, Nike may not currently be a top ranked contender, but their definitely an old school hall of fame level player.

    So while not saying they were doing the world a favor by dropping cloud shoe lace support, I am saying that the situation is hilarious.