The author may be a right-wing fellow. Nonetheless, the data he exposes are taken from official Mozilla docs.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    With FF being one of the last bastions of actual web-freedom on the internet, it wouldn’t surprise me for people to start digging for things in an effort to get rid of them once and for all. Especially with Google’s new attempt at web-DRM.

    Not many browsers left that aren’t chromium/webkit based. Feels like it’s only a matter of time before Google succeeds where Microsoft failed back in the early 00’s…

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hell, when they were Netscape they lost to IE. IE became the default that it did because Netscape Navigator would take 5 minutes to boot up, and would load pages slower too.

        • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. Because Microsoft lost an entire gigantic anti-trust case over building the Browser into the OS.

          Of course it loaded faster when MS poisoning the well of open web standards with embrace and extend.

          And we have the records to prove this.

          • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re merging two different events into one.
            I’m talking about the rise of IE. When it was an outright better browser. You’re talking about events that happened when it was at its peak popularity, but was an outright outdated browser, coincidentally just when Chrome was ramping up.

            Just like Firefox is now over Chrome.

            Except now, with Google doing things MS never even dreamed of, there isn’t whisper of any investigation or sanctions from the EU.

        • SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I wonder if something else happened at the exact same time. Something about trust and not being pro it or something like that.

    • Sept@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In a way I agree with you, but it’s kind of well known that Mozilla depends a lot on Google from earning money. So I’m not sure that if Google pushes the DRM project, Mozilla will bite the hand that feeds it.

      But the good thing is that we will probably see that very soon :)

      • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Uhm, aren’t all questions raised in that text completely on point?

        I’m as far left as it gets but none of these expenses make any sense to me. The CEO pay is bonkers. Wtf are they doing? Why does the CEO deserve to basically collect the entirety of donations for… basically just extending a cash cow deal with Google?

        I don’t give a damn if the author is on the right but so far this looks sus as fuck.

        Firefox being as good and fast as it is probably more an accomplishment of individual teams inspite of company leadership and that should be called out.

        Can’t sell yourself as the underdog if you’re got almost half a billion in assets.

          • ThankYouVeryMuch@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            This ‘related organization’ is Mozilla Corp, for-profit owned by the Mozilla Foundation that has Baker as its CEO as well.

            I’m a lifelong Mozilla user, but these things stink a bit. I find even more concerning the dependency from google

            • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am not a fan of high compensation overall on the C-Level. What I’m worried about most with these types of companies is being destroyed from within. That’s generally heralded by bringing in high cost outside consultancy firms.

              I don’t see that yet on their balance sheet. No idea what Mozilla Corp. does, but the Mozilla Foundation is still doing things I am aligned with.

              But as with all things, constant vigilence is key. More and more it feels like there’s barely anywhere left to invest time or money in. Fediverse is truly a ray of sunshine at the moment. But I wonder how long that’ll last until it’s been subverted by commercial interests.

              • ThankYouVeryMuch@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                A CEO that brings lots of money and consistently gets to lower the share of your flagship browser seems like a good candidate to destroyed from within. How can Mozilla stay independent when most of their money comes from these ‘royalties’ and most of it is from Google? We’re talking hundreds of millions agains 7 mil in donations that barely pay for the CEO. How are they gonna push back against this webDRM shit google is trying to pull (or any other thing)?

                I feel the same as you, I’ve been using Mozilla/Firefox since forever, because I felt they were doing things I’m aligned with. But I don’t know anymore. I don’t know if they are doing it or they have started to become just muppet opposition.

                Enshittification spreads fast, once it takes roots its to late. But it sure seems like, lately, it’s an all out attack on any freedom left on the internet

                • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If Google is successful with their garbage webDRM, I feel we might actually get a sort of reset back to the early 2000s internet for those that care to get out of that corporate hell hole the “internet” has become.

                  And thanks to the Fediverse we might not even need something like Google ever again. But then they’ll start attacking the infrastructure itself. Make it prohibitively expensive to run such instances, etc. Attack them with content that gets instances banned, etc.

                  No matter where one looks, it feels it’s an all out war on any minor comfort or freedom left to the non-ultra-rich-ultra-connected.

                  So. As for Firefox. What’s a good alternative? I’m very fond of the container thing they got going, but everything else can be replaced, I believe.

          • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for sharing your knowledge and providing new data points instead of just coming up with reasons to assume my questions had malintent. Appreciated!

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. The only official Mozilla response to Google’s WebDRM that I’ve seen was on the git page where the Firefox engineer raised the concern. Mozilla’s Google liaison shot down the statement opposing WebDRM as “premature” since it is currently “only a proposal” (by a working group of Google engineers).

    • Engywuck@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      59
      ·
      1 year ago

      With FF being one of the last bastions of actual web-freedom on the internet

      How cute people who sincerely believe the fairy tales Mozilla tells…