• clay830ee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The really annoying part is YouTube gets all their content for free, while every other subscription video service pays for content.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do, but the costs to store all of that high resolution video is enormous. Especially since it must be replicated to local repository for quicker access as popularity raises and removed when popularity falls on videos. The amount of content stored and served is significantly more than Netflix houses. That being said, ads are getting way too intrusive.

    • Helluin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      other streaming services dont let pretty much anyone upload gigabytes of video

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Me gesturing at gazillions of porn sites that lets anyone upload any videos…

        If YouTube implodes, pornhub will immediately launch an sfw version to grab the fleeing content creators.

        • LiquorFan@pathfinder.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly I’m surprised they haven’t done so already, they already have the tech to do it, probably need to scale it a bit.

          Now I wonder if there aren’t SFW videos in pornhub from people that want to upload videos but don’t want to use YouTube. Or NSFW video that aren’t really porn, like a random guy reviewing videogames naked for some reason. I’m not checking either.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I remember people from certain subreddits used to upload full movies to pornhub and share them for shit and giggles.

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ad revenue is a portion of what the advertisers paid.

        YouTube DOES get its content for free. They pay YouTubers per view, essentially a portion of profit, whereas something like Netflix pays for the creation of content and then also a portion of profit made.

        • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who pays for the severs and billions of gigabytes of storage required to hold all those videos?

            • Tempotown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              How much data left is there to sell about me? Pretty sure they know pretty much everything about us already.

              My surfing habits change a little, but it’s mostly cyclical.

              • dtc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They don’t need new data to sell, they just find a new client who doesn’t have your info yet.

          • Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The point is that that’s in their own interest, because if they wouldn’t host it, they wouldn’t make any money.

          • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Source on it being billions? All I could find was that they get 76PB/yr, which doesn’t add up to multiple EBs.

      • svahnen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe he is referring to the fact that YouTube don’t have to pay upfront for new content, they even get new content without hunting for it, and many smaller channels don’t have partnership and so on.

        Sure they have a platform, backend and so on. But Netflix needs to have all that too plus buy things to show to their customers.

        • ClassyDave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what I thought, and it’s kind of a silly point to make. You’re just moving around the order of the steps. They still pay for it.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe he is referring to the fact that YouTube don’t have to pay upfront for new content, they even get new content without hunting for it, and many smaller channels don’t have partnership and so on.

          Well, sure, but on the other hand, those smaller creators couldn’t attract any attention or grow their audience without a platform to do it on. And, like it or not, youtube has that and doesn’t charge those new creators anything to use the platform (unlike platforms like Vimeo, as one example).

          Most of those large profitable channels wouldn’t have been able to grow totbhwir current size without a free to use platform to spread their content to a wider audience.

          There’s give and take on both sides.

            ;

          Of course, the payment share on ads and memberships is fair and equitable is a separate discussion…