• Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The word woke lost all meaning due to far-right wingers constantly using it as a catch-all term for everything they don’t like.

    Also, I love how they made it so the top 3 bad guys are atheists, agnostics (which are pretty much the same thing) and the jewish. They’re not even trying to be covert with propaganda.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are, however, “pretty much” the same thing.

        Most self-described atheists are also agnostic. That is, they don’t claim to KNOW that they are right not to believe.

        Most self-described agnostics are also atheists. That is, they are not theists.

        Both can generally be described as agnostic atheists, as can most rational non believers.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    reminder that every time people complain about wokeness they’re literally just complaining about being conscious about systemic racism, because that’s what woke means.

    Just replace “woke” with “being a decent person” and it becomes pretty clear what these people want.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Woke” started out as a simple acknowledgment that a person is conscious of the systemic oppression of various groups. Now the right wing has got its claws into the term it’s been effectively neutered. Now all it means is, “stuff that right wingers don’t like”

      It’s like “defund the police” which quickly became “abolish all policing”.

      It’s a useful strategy for them and it works to prevent honest discussion on how to solve societal problems by preventing people from having a shared understanding of the language needed for such discussion.

      • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ugh, “defund the police” is a terrible phrase if you actually want the movement to succeed. I wish they would have gone with something along the lines of “police reform”. Immediately every conservative glommed onto “now they want to abolish all police!”

        We do need a massive overhaul to police. Unfortunately that means better marketing of the idea of it’s going to happen.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I could be wrong but “defund the police” was just a discussion point for activists talking amongst themselves. In that context it makes sense. What happened was that this inelegant phrase was seized as a weapon by the right and then every Dem politician had to answer if they supported the idea of abolishing the police.

          I’d imagine that many people would be receptive to the idea of taking some money out of police budgets so social workers and people trained in deescalation can be hired. For example cops aren’t a good fit when dealing with people facing mental health crises because they mostly turn to use of force and make a bad situation worse.

          If you twist this into, “are you in favor of abolishing all police?” then most people are going to say, “hell no, what a stupid idea, you moron”.

          Now any discussion about the rotten state of policing in the US had been effectively hobbled. Discussion is shut down. The right wing wins.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What happened was that this inelegant phrase was seized as a weapon by the right

            I vividly remember tons of memes and posts on reddit, done in leftist grups by leftist people stating the sentence “defund the police”. The right did manipulate the meaning, but saying that they were the sole perpetrators of the popularity of the phrase is silly.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “It’s like “defund the police” which quickly became “abolish all policing”.”

        It’s actually the other way around. The radical demand got watered down but it didn’t slow the fearmongeringbl even a little bit

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same happened to the terms “political correctness” and “social justice”. The meaning gets twisted into something grotesque by think tanks and then it’s shipped out to talking heads so Billy-Bob can regurgitate it at the water cooler.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Critical Race Theory, school libraries full of porn, caravans of migrants heading to the southern border, activist judges legislating from the bench, and so on.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still have a hard time how “woke” is bad. Woke means your not asleep, it means you are not guided by others. How can people turn this into a bad thing. I’m proud to be woke.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Woke means that if you’re in a privileged position in a society, more equality is a threat to your status and should be suppressed.

    • Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of ‘woke’ people are shitty people. I’ve had way too many experiences in the past few years with ‘woke’ people screaming at me about how I need to read more women authors or I’m a shitty awful human being. Or other equally absurd things, like I’m a bigot if I don’t ask you what your pronoun is. If you have a pronoun preference, how about you tell me? Just like you tell someone how to pronounce your name if it’s non-standard.

      I know lots of progressive people, and I am progressive. But I would never say I am ‘woke’. People who self-identify ‘woke’ tend to be mentally ill crazy people in my encounters, and use their politics as an excuse for abusive and hostile behavior just the way right-wing nazi nutbags do.

      Hell I even had a transwoman assault me verbally one day while I was just reading a book in a cafe. Comes up to me and demands that I give her my table because I’m a white cis guy and I should give up my ‘privileged’ to her. I told her to f off. My small business has been harassed by ‘woke’ activists who demand we give them money or they will say we are anti-black/lgbt+, etc. That’s not woke, that’s blackmail.

      Most ‘woke’ people I meet are basically 20 sometime trust-fund types who need a cause to give her their miserable lives purpose, because god knows they can’t get their shit together and do something positive with their lives. If they did maybe they’d stop being such awful abusive people who threaten and harass others.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Comes up to me and demands that I give her my table because I’m a white cis guy and I should give up my ‘privileged’ to her.

        I’ll take “Things that never happened” for 600, Alex

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hell I even had a transwoman assault me verbally one day while I was just reading a book in a cafe. Comes up to me and demands that I give her my table because I’m a white cis guy and I should give up my ‘privileged’ to her.

        I’m betting this never happened.

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except woke people aren’t decent. Some woke people have good intentions, sure, but they aren’t decent. Being woke means being evil.

  • crackajack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The questioning is stupid. There is no nuance on the categorisation of frequency because “always” and “sometimes” are put together. They do not mean the same thing! “Always” means “all the time”, “sometimes” means “on occasions”. I am an advocate for free speech as much as the next person, but there is limit to that right because history has shown what can happen if free speech is absolute-- which led us the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide. Therefore, “sometimes” you COULD shout down someone depending on the content being spouted. So, on a case by case basis, “on occasions” you could shout down someone.

    As another poster pointed out, the company who made the survey is conducted by conservative group, FIRE, which is Koch-funded so obviously there is clear bias and dishonesty in the framing of the survey.

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Study is done by “TheFire.org,” which is described as a competitor to the ACLU.

    I know… why do we need a competitor to the ACLU?

    Well, per Wikipedia: “FIRE has been described as a competitor of the ACLU. In 2021, the organization had an annual revenue of $16.1 million. FIRE has received major funding from groups which primarily support conservative and libertarian causes, including the Bradley Foundation, Sarah Scaife Foundation, and the Charles Koch Institute.”

    Oh Charles Koch, you scoundrel.

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There seems to be an innate need for religion.

    For whom? Because I sure as shit don’t have any need to believe in fairy tales.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On the most fundamental level: For everyone. That’s because every world-view bogs down to a logical system and all logical systems are grounded in circular reasoning, paradox, or assumptions not provable in that system.

      People believe in all kinds of things, e.g. that the judge who’s sentencing you to prison is more than a human in fancy clothes. Or that the social reality that gives them that power doesn’t exist. Both stances are, ultimately, insane, and so are we all.

      EDIT: ITT: Cargo cultists not understanding what science is (a process) and isn’t (proof of anything).

  • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this graph isn’t just made up bs in the first place, one thought I recall from every major college campus I’ve been to is random religious preachers camped out every day telling everyone they’re evil, subhuman, and going to hell. Guessing the atheists find that a little more annoying and worthy of shouting back at than some of the religiously inclined.

  • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Non-American here. What is Christian and why Catholic, protestant, and orthodox Christians are not Christians?

    This doesn’t make much sense

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every religion is a belief system, but not every belief system a religion.

    Every billionaire Elon Musk is an idiot, but not every idiot billionaire Elon Musk.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it’s been proven that humans have a psychological need for religion, but…

    Wokeness? A religion?

    Eh at worst you have companies overcompensating to avoid seeming racist or sexist… and you have tankies taking it too far and claiming everything is imperialist bullshit, but that’s hardly a new phenomenon… Hippies of yesteryear did similar.

    But again, worst case scenarios.

    There’s nothing wrong with saying “Maybe you shouldn’t speak here, or, anywhere really?” if a guy is literally going to Colleges to give seminars on how “Hitler did nothing wrong, and maybe transpeople, and not the constantly crashing economy and the blatant failure of trickle down… are to blame for all of your problems.”

    I remember when being “Woke” had positive connotations, but the Right Wing ruins everything.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If humans have a need for religion then how do atheists exist?

      Do you have a link for that? Not sure I believe that

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s good to be skeptical, afterall, a sourceless claim isn’t worth much.

        https://www.apa.org/monitor/2010/12/believe

        It’s why you see a shrinking number of people going to church, yet seemingly paradoxical more cases of atheists going to church “For the sense of community”

        Evolutionary speaking, If there really isn’t a god, that’s terrible news for human race. In fact the only thing keeping me believing that there might be is being fully Lucid of the horror of a Godless universe.

        I can find no optimism in that

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would there not being a god be a bad thing?

          It makes me proud that humanity clawed our way through stages of evolution and was capable of getting where we are now without the need of some overseeing being controlling us like puppets.

          If you see someone do good, it means they themselves did that. They chose to help, and not because some authority told them to, but because they are good inside.

          Of course, if the fear of being punished is the only thing keeping you from doing harm, then please stay a believer. But the big majority of people do not need that to stay a decent human being.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe I already told you that I am agnostic, I do not claim to know for certain if God does or does not exist. However I doubt that he does. And I consider a universe without God to be terrifying more so than being punished by God for failure to act in a certain way. The problem with they’re not being a god, is that mean this world is all we get, it is our one chance to do anything, and nothing we do will ever be remembered not even by us. Because in a world without the Supernatural death does not mean that it just goes black, it doesn’t go anything. You just stop existing.

  • Archmage Azor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Atheism” has been appropriated by people with a grudge against religion who wants to destroy it at all costs, and convert all practitionerd of religion to atheism. So, armchair crusaders.