• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Vegan milks are nice to drink, but they are very very different to real milk. Having tea with oat milk is a sacrifice (almond and coconut are worse for tea - they lack the sweetness that counteracts the bitter elements of tea), it doesn’t taste as good but it’s ok. It’s a small sacrifice to make, but a persistent one (given that many of us rely on caffeine to function at work).

    There is a moral argument to be made, and the moral argument has the high ground if you avoid looking too carefully (nothing in life is simple).

    The real crux of the vegan argument is “can people also sacrifice this”, or is it one sacrifice too many in the world of compromises we endure. That’s a personal choice, and given the state of the world today, it isn’t one many will be able to make.

    • Quirky Quinn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Cows milk is gross. Give me soy all day every day. Better tasting, better for you, better for the environment, better for the animals.

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      In my experience sacrifice is a relative matter, and soon dissipates. Every abstained choice gets replaced with an alternative, and the more alternatives that are explored the more it becomes apparent that there is an entire culinary world that has been ignored. It becomes apparent that what felt like sacrifice is in fact opportunity, and those opportunities are well worth investigating in full.

      If you keep exploring plant-based options you will be a lot more likely to find what works for you, than if you just give up.

      It should also be noted, dairy impairs the bioavailability of beneficial plant-based compounds. Here are a few studies. Milk and coffee. Milk and blueberries. And Milk and tea.

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s an interesting perspective - no promises but I’ll give it a go and audit the stats on those papers.

        If true, the price may be worth it.

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It has been for me. As a fellow tea enjoyer, lung function, gut health, a melting away of aching joints and physical malaise, seasonal allergy alleviation, and a shockingly boosted immune system are all benefits that I’ve personally enjoyed since going fully plant-based. Most likely heart benefits as well, but I won’t know for sure until I get my cholesterol levels tested.

          But of course personal anecdotes are not valid evidence. Which is fine, because the science largely favors diets that are at least mostly plant-centric anyway.

    • Arthur Dent@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Talking about milk (why drinking milk from a different species? Would you drink milk from a dog? Or from a neighbours women? If not - why not?)

      … fun fact, lactose intolerant is actually the normal form. Approx 75% of all humans world-wide are lactose intolerant.

      The fact that people in “western world” can drink milk (and lactose) has been trained for some thousand years.

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Ad hominem fallacy is when the person is attacked as an invalidation of an argument.

          You were defending the ethics of drinking cow’s milk, so talking about the ethics of drinking cow’s milk is perfectly on topic and not a fallacy. Otherwise, you’d be able to claim ad hominem on ANY counterargument!

        • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Ad HoMiNeM

          lmao I wasn’t attacking your person (I am now though lol) I was calling your act entitled, based on the argument before. Yeah if you think you’re entitled to kill anothers child and take her milk, that’s entitlement. Literally the definition lmfao, begging redditors to actually look up the terms they use blobcat, laughing

    • happyfullfridge@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s why veganism should be forced on people (just shutting down factory farms would drive up meat prices so much it might be enough)

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Honestly, I’m in favour of this, but that worries me.

        In general, such actions will also raise the price of other goods as demand increase. You’d also need to keep non-meat prices low, and that’ll be expensive, meaning cuts elsewhere.

        Making the world vegan isn’t just about stopping the meat industry, that’s rather like pulling cogs from a machine and praying it still runs. It’s about designing a better machine that doesn’t need those cogs, sacrificing to build it, and making sure it really is better.

        For the vegan path that means sustainable agriculture (it isn’t at the moment), replicating tastes and caloric density (a key element of human culture), avoiding creating new issues (e.g. overuse of sugar, dietary issues with mycelial/nut sensitivity), and pushing food costs down.

        So, if you want the world to be vegan, drop your current life and start working on the above!

        • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          We throw so much veg and bread and everything away, I would say it’s likely there’s plenty for everyone to eat even if we stopped producing meat this very instance. But obviously no one is arguing for that because that isn’t feasible. We don’t have the numbers (yet) to force this.

          • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Reduction in waste is also a key step yes, one in which gains are being made. Teaching simple preservation techniques (e.g. oven toasting old bread) is also a good route to doing this.

            • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              It’s not about the individuals, I wasn’t even thinking of a household throwing away food when I wrote the comment. But the tons and tons and tons and tons of groceries shops throw out because people didn’t buy it. The harvests that are left to rot because transporting them wouldn’t be profitable. I don’t think me throwing out three day old bread is going to be that much less wasteful than heating up the oven rehumidifying it.