I will preface this by saying I understand that I am more radical, revolutionary, and extreme of a leftist than most. Despite that, I still ask that you actually engage with this as I’m asking in good faith.

When is enough enough? We have elected a fascist into the highest office and handed the keys to him and his friends. Is now not the time to actually get organized, involved, and armed? In my opinion, the time for peaceful, democratic means of avoiding fascism was before the election. But we have failed to do so, and as such there will soon be a tyrant in power. Are we going to wait until troops are rolling down the street to stage any form of resistance, because by then it’s far too late. Now I want to be clear that I am not advocating for random acts of violence or an insurrection like January 6th. But is this not a point of radicalization? Is this not where we start organizing within our communities and getting involved in mutual aid and resistance? How much more do we need before people are actually ready to stand, fight, and maybe even die to avoid continuing down the path that we are on? Fascism is not on the horizon, it is here. Are we really to do nothing about it as a society except lay down and accept our fate? Because that doesn’t jive with me. That makes absolutely no sense to me.

ETA: To the people responding, I will admit that I was heated and frustrated when writing this post. Having had time to cool off, reflect, and get some differing viewpoints my stance has changed to focus more on what needs to happen first and what’s practical. You may have seen that in my responses. That being said, I don’t disagree with what I said here, and I’m still frustrated we’re at this point at all. I’ve linked a comment though that elaborates upon what I actually want to see done though, which is a lot more reasonable and is still inline with this post.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13305217

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not an American, but I can’t help but notice something:

    A clear majority elected Trump. Over 71 million Americans went out of their way to vote for him, saying “I am proud to be a Nazi.”

    If you are going to fight (either figuratively or physically), then understand that a majority of the USA supports a fascist state.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      71 million in a country of 262 million adults. 27% voted for fascism. 74 million voted for trump in 2020. This wasn’t a shift towards fascism, but the opposition party utterly failing to win voters.

      The country has never been majority rule. Every modern election has split the country in thirds, about a third votes one way, a third votes the other and a third choses not to vote.

      Over 70% of voting aged americans did not vote for trump.

      edit: spelling correction.

      • Goun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wait, did Trump win with 27% of votes!? How do you still use this system?

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, he got >50% of all votes that were cast. The voting system wasn’t the problem this time, the voters were.

          • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            If the voters are the problem every time, the problem probably isn’t the voters, it’s probably the system. The US always has bad turnout.

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              A turnout between 60 and 70% is actually pretty standard for a Western democracy without mandatory voting.

              The voting system wasn’t the issue, here. The people around you are.

        • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, that’s a misleading number.

          27% of the entire eligible population voted for him. Less than that voted for Harris. About 45% of eligible voters didn’t bother.

          So Trump got more than 50% of the popular vote, as well as the majority of seats. First past the poll is a terrible system, but it’s not the system that’s at fault here, it’s the voters.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This isn’t even a system issue (FPTP, electoral college).

          What you’re remarking on is the need for mandatory voting and a federal holiday on voting day

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unless you make voting mandatory, that will always be the case. Regardless, the split amongst non-voters is statistically likely to be the same as the people who actually voted. Consider the election to be an information poll, with a sample size of ~65% of the entire eligible population.

        So with updated numbers, Trump got 72.5M out of ~240M eligible voters, so yeah you could say that 70% of the population didn’t vote for him. But then to be clear, you should also look at Harris’s 68M votes, and say that 72% of the population didn’t vote for her.

        The people who mark and deposit their ballots are the only measure we have of the nation’s opinion, and in that contest a majority of the votes went to Trump.

        • Shanedino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          If literally everyone is forced to vote things actually lean more left. The way you force people to vote though can affected different socioeconomic groups differently so can have a wide range of effects.

          • normal_user@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You solution to people not voting is not to appeal more to those people but to force them ? lol

            That would not move anything to the left. Democrats would feel free to go as right as they want knowing that the are the only big party that is not the Republicans.

            I can already see it, they would spend sooooo much money to make any actual left party unable to compete, then they would shift as much to the right as possible, and then loose.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is meaningless though.

          You said “a clear majority voted for Trump”. In fact: a majority of Americans didn’t vote for a fascist. That is a good thing.

          Neither did a majority of Americans vote for a milquetoast centrist, but I don’t expect anyone to take a great deal of comfort or pain in that fact.

        • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          republicans do voter suppression and purge voter roles. victims of either of these practices would be punished with a larger tax burden. not ideal.

          voting should be compulsory

    • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I understand that wholeheartedly. But I personally refuse to be one of those people that sit back while everything deteriorates. When Hitler was elected a majority did nothing, but many chose resistance. I refuse to be the majority who live as cowards under fascism, so if that means I die resisting then so be it.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        I personally wish I could just leave, but most countries won’t accept a useless factory worker like myself… I’m quickly realizing this isn’t my country. This is a country of Nazis.

        These are the people that hear complaints that the entire yard is covered in rakes, but until they step on one and have it smack them in the face then it isn’t a problem. I’m sick of living with selfish Nazis.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hitler never even got close to a majority in any election. That’s the scary part about this: Trump didn’t even have to seize power, the population just handed it to him.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think you actually did get my point.

        The fascists are the majority. The majority will do nothing because they chose this, and you - the people fighting fascism - are in the minority.

        I’m not saying I disagree with you, but it is important to understand that your revolution is actually going against the will of the American people.

        • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re right, but resistance is more than just revolution and even if everyone else is ok with living in 1984, I’m not. I know plenty of people who aren’t and I have a feeling the majority of the people where I live aren’t either (especially based on the voting data). Resistance to tyranny and injustice itself is just, and it can take many forms. Ideally yes there would be a revolution to remove the fascists from power and build something better, but that’s mostly lip service. I won’t lie, i was very frustrated when I wrote the post but in cooling down I am remembering that the resistance will have to start small and will have to grow. You’re welcome to see some of my other comments for what I’m talking about that isn’t revolution.

        • expr@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          In absolute terms, they aren’t the majority. 73m voted for him out of the 161m eligible voters in the US, or ~45% (Harris has ~43%). Still a frighteningly high number, but it also means it’s possible to find support for resistance, at least if things start to get bad enough. Unfortunately, there are a lot of Americans that like to think that politics don’t concern them and that we should just be apolitical. So they’re going to need a wake-up call first before they would lend their support. Trump will likely give it to them in short order as his fascist policies start to directly affect them.

          Also, keep in mind that the total population (~334m as of 2023) is much larger than the population that is eligible to vote. There are many young people that are too young to vote now but still old enough to fight tyranny, former felons who are ineligible to vote but eager to fight oppressive systems, not to mention the scores of people not counted among eligible voters due to not being registered to vote, either through complacency/disillusionment (see above) or active sabotage and disenfranchisement by Republicans (and in many ways, you could say these are one in the same).

          Fascists may have power and have won the popular vote, but it doesn’t mean it’s the will of the people. It means they’ve successfully gamed our very broken system. But real, average people living their lives will fight when the oppression comes to them. Maybe it will be too late, but maybe not. Revolution only needs a single spark.