Detroit man steals 800 gallons using Bluetooth to hack gas pumps at station::undefined

    • Erasmus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure about this specific pump but this same thing happened in my town several months back and BT was used then too.

      When it happened we found out that the pumps at the station in particular (and probably most) have a BT receiver tied to whatever little processor that runs the pump so either a station manager or someone servicing the pumps can access them with the right equipment, make internal adjustments etc.

      In the case that happened locally to us. Someone hacked them the same way, then posted to Facebook and other social media sites to come get some free gas, etc.

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        All the pumps I’ve seen have a physical key protecting them too. They’re supposed to unlock it in the morning and lock it when staff leave for the night. I’d guess these stations didn’t do that?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          From everything I know about locks in important places, all pumps probably use the same key. You can probably buy that key online. I know this is true for elevators and those boxes for entering buildings, and Crown Vic police cars (and the taxis they’ve become after being sold), and many other things.

        • Erasmus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know about that part. Just that it was all over the news when it happened here and I later read about the details as to how they did it.

          I would have assumed the makers of the pumps would had put into them a little tighter security but then again look at some of these password and other web hacks we routinely see.

          • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a convergence of issues. First, and probably foremost, users are idiots. So it has to be able to be operated by a 5 year with a learning disability. Second, implementing security costs money up front. It is cheaper to let the customer deal with the fall out, then do damage control on the cheap, and keep going. Third, users can’t be assed to access things that a 5 year old with learning and physical disabilities and a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in one hand can’t access. These are all typical issues stuff is engineered towards. This is why you see this same basic issue crop up over and over again.

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’d be surprised how many times “good enough” is considered “good enough” when it comes to IT and security, even when it’s really the bare minimum.

    • Fungah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah okay.

      My hardware knowledge is limited to ruining many sets of alligator chips trying to dump a virus from an infected UEFI/rewrite the chip so that I’d have a usable motherboard and a nasty virus to poke and prod at.

      I guess I’ve always managed to set an esxi server to route internet traffic through a PC so my IPS can get at it and drop the bad stuff. Still trying to figure out the SIEM piece.

      And smart lights / plugs. Many, many many of those.

      I’ve got a decade of experience as an AE in a very techy field though.

      If it’s a choice between me and a homeless guy then I’m definitely the guy.

  • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait so they haven’t caught them yet? The article gave no names. And why do these pumps have Bluetooth? You might as well put in a USB service port.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      USB is way safer lol.

      Bluetooth is notoriously bad with security. Especially Bluetooth 4 and earlier. I’d put money on a gas station pumps Bluetooth to not be using the most up to date protocol.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like saying TCP has bad security. That is to say, pointless comparison. Bluetooth is just transport layer and security is done on higher level. This is most likely the classic example of “security through obscurity”. Meaning they did nothing special and hoped no one will figure it out, just like recent TETRA vulnerability.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Transport layer is absolutely a security vulnerability vector.

          TCP is absolutely low security if not configured correctly.

          I don’t know what it is you’re trying to say. I agree that this instance was probably security through obscurity failing, but to say that Bluetooth, TCP, and other transport layer protocols are not security considerations is absolutely ridiculous (see for example, heartbleed). It’s exactly the reason there are multiple versions of Bluetooth. It’s why FTP is (should be) all but deprecated and SFTP and FTPS are standard. It’s why Google doesn’t index webpages without an SSL certificate.

          USB is way safer

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course wired connection is inherently safer than wireless. There’s no question about it. And yes you can absolutely exploit at every layer of communication, but this here is not the case of exploiting Bluetooth as transport layer. It’s simply someone not configuring anything or adding any additional verification and just hoping no one finds out.

            • foggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, but your claim that my comparing Bluetooth to USB being like comparing Bluetooth to TCP is misinformed at best.

              • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                My comment had nothing to do with Bluetooth vs. USB comparison. I only said Bluetooth is a transport layer and claiming it’s “notoriously bad security” is not all that correct since most of the security parts come on top of it. So in many ways Bluetooth is quite similar to TCP, at least from point of communication. From the software point of view, both with Bluetooth and TCP, you create a socket then send and receive data through it. Literally the same interface. Protecting data that goes through either method is meant to be done at that point be it with encryption, identity verification, whatever.

                Same thing applies to USB, but being physical it has added benefit of having to connect to it but that opens whole set of new potential issues. So it’s easier to physically protect it, but should that protection fail, you might end up in even more trouble.

                • foggy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You can disable a USB port and require remote SSH to enable it.

                  USB is way safer.

  • Lutra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    This exemplifies Fox - they provided a lengthy article, and a 3 person video with interviews, and yet the listener/reader knows no more about what actually happened than before they began. Its well produced hearsay.

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      You would be surprised, and then very worried, to find out what things needlessly have bluetooth

      I saw a guy detail how to hack a house through a fridge.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get unreasonably angry at salespeople when they brag about Bluetooth and wifi on appliances.

        I know I shouldn’t. But wtf do you want your toaster to have internet access?

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          because idiots with more money than sense think its “neat” to pay an extra hundred dollars to be told their toaster is done toasting while they are in the other room, instead of listening for the loud ass KERSHINKLUNK

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wrong. It’s because smart people making toasters realize they can add a $0.50 piece of hardware and charge $100 more for the whole thing now that it’s “IoT enabled”… then have it call back to a server with everyone’s daily toasting routines which they can sell to data aggregators who will “anonymously” derive things like geographic power usage and breakfast hours split by demographics, to allow marketers better target ads at you.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              …and they do it because idiots with more money than sense think its “neat” to pay an extra hundred dollars blah blah blah.

              • jarfil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If the final price was the same, they’d still do it, that statistical data pays for itself. Some idiots wanting to pay extra for the privilege of being tracked… is just a happy coincidence.

                Look at what happened to SmartTVs: in the beginning, that “Smart” was an “extra”; now, the TVs without tracking cost extra (and have fewer features).

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  the only company I know of that still makes dumb TVs is Scepter… Which can be a dice roll, with how they acquire their panels.

                  besides, Smart TVs are indeed dangerous, but only if you give them an internet connection.

                  Things like blutooth toasters, though? They connect to the internet through your phone via their app, cause “smart” devices like that always require an app to use, so they can send all that data back home.

        • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like my toast on a schedule and one day when they invent the robot that moves the bread from the pantry and into the toaster I’ll have my dream. One Bluetooth device at a time.

        • jasondj@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean I really like getting push notifications when the dishwasher or laundry is done, or the kids leave the fridge door slightly open…but a toaster is a bit excessive. I’m thinking about turning off notifications on my microwave as it is.

    • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have to wonder if the are confusing NFC with Bluetooth? Many newer pumps have smart chip tap pads now. I suspect they have found an exploit for this now.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they use Bluetooth for management and configuration.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it really theft? Considering how much of his tax dollars have gone to subsidize the oil and gas industry?

    • Kentronix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, considering the oil company doesn’t own the gas station and still gets paid for the fuel. The person you’re stealing from is the owner of the gas station who purchases the fuel and then in many areas sells fuel with very low margin in hopes of you coming into the store for snacks and drinks to make money on higher margin products. So even if they are selling a large amount of fuel, they aren’t making a lot of profit to make up for the theft.

    • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, that already is used to significantly lower at-the-pump gas prices from what they actually are, and raising gas prices is an easy way to lose an election in America, so that probably won’t change. Notice that in many other countries gas prices are way higher than in the US.

  • therealrjp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    The grammar in this article is horrendous. It’s almost as if Fox isn’t a reputable source for news!

  • mulcahey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    This article has so few details. How do we think they’re pulling this off? Phones? A Flipper maybe? And then what?

  • beaubbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some places let you pump THEN pay inside. You could just fill and leave. Is that not basically the same thing? Thay can catch them the same way.

    • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is every petrol station in Australia, don’t think I’ve every seen anybody do a runner, not like it’s hard to catch up

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s how it used to work in most of the US. Every once in awhile, you’d be in a rough area and have to pay ahead of time but it was rare. When they switched to credit/debit cards, it generally became “Pay inside if you can’t use a card.”

        It wasn’t much of a problem even when crime peaked in the U.S. (late 80’s and 90’s) and you could theoretically get away with it. Gas stations have always had security cameras.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Australian pumps all have the capability to pay at the pump.

          It’s almost always restricted to fleet buyers (taxis, delivery vans, etc). If you’re a regular consumer they force you walk past a tasty array of chocolates and other addictive high margin products before you’re allowed to pay. They even give you a a couple bucks off your gas if you spend ten bucks on chocolate.

    • sndrtj@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is very much the default in the Netherlands. Yes theft happens, but your license plate will be clearly visibly on CCTV meaning you will get a visit by police soon after.

    • x4740N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not if its a stolen car, car without plates in some area they aren’t likely to be caught or one of those cars that has that thing that can change numberplates

      The car with the changeable numberplate would be harder to catch if it was a super common car in the area as well

      • jcit878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        all those things are risky as fuck with police AI number plate recognition these days. it would take no time at all to track someone down over $50 theft

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          $50 for the gas theft… how much for the tampering with government mandated ID, or whatever they’d call swapping plates?

          • jcit878@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            exactly. its a crime from a different era, risks far outweigh reward now

  • nostradiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    4$ per gallon that’s approximately 1$ per litre.

    I hope it will at least double for you so you know what it’s like to pay for petrol in Europe…

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope it will at least double to shock the system into prioritizing clean energy.

      • Stuka@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, hurt the poor people to make the rich wake up. That’ll definitely work!

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would be quite a boost on top of how cheap solar is getting. Just need a good and cheap storage solution for the grid to run on more and more solar later and later into the evening.

      • nostradiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s lovely idea but I don’t have even money to buy a newly made car. Where I’m supposed to get money for significantly more expensive (price and repair coat) and unreliable electric car? Now I can repair my car on my own cause it’s old and easy, also easy to refill. Electric cars is not the way. Also it’s not that green as everybody thinks…

        • Fiskelord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          The perspective is fun, buying a new car in Denmark is a big investment, for many people it’s around what they make in a year after taxes, and even then it’s a relatively small car. I’m not saying electric is the golden bullet people want it to be, far from it as of right now, but we need to change something in order to have a chance of saving ourselves from destroying the planet. Perhaps a higher fuel cost will incentivice smaller cars, and thus better milage, for our American friends?

            • nostradiel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You guys have cheap gas and cars in comparison to my country (the Czech Republic) considering the average wage, which is ~ 22 200$ here. And the prices of cars (and mostly everything) are higher here than in the USA. Whole last year we had inflation of 17% and now it’s not particularly lower.

              Our politicians instead of aiding people are taking money from them in taxing more basic stuff like water, food and also more tax on income, taking money from elderly people, not supporting families (it’s cheaper here to not be married) while raising their salaries and buying fcking military planes and gear in value higher than is our yearly GDP.

              When people demonstrate in Prague on the main square (usually over 100k people, which is 1% people of our whole country, 2x quarterly) their bought mainstream media mitigate the impact and label the people as pro-rusian idiots, even though the demonstration is about unhappiness of people with government not about Russia at all.

              Our government is lead by a party which didn’t even win the elections, not even closely. They put together 5 parties (of which other 4 basically betrayed their voters by merging with the other parties of different ideas) to create a majority in order to do as they wish.

              They created new laws like that nobody in parlament can talk for more than 5 minutes cause they didn’t like obstructions from other parties to fight their program. They don’t even talk to unions and take interviews anymore about topics which mostly concerns the people.

              It’s as bad as it sounds…

            • Fiskelord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, I definitely agree with that one. Sometimes there is a genuine need for a car of that size, but whether it being media propaganda or not, I feel like there is a lean towards cars of that class, and usually not in a “I need this for a specific purpose, and not just to show the world how small my donger is” kind of way.

          • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            The solution is not more fuel efficient or fuel alternative cars, it’s the replacement of cars entirely (where reasonable). But you can’t shock that, because it requires infrastructure which literally doesn’t exist in much of North America, and is severely lacking in the rest of it.

            • Thatpilotguy89@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              We used to have good public transit but it was demonized and dismantled by car manufacturers. There is a bus that runs near my house but the closest I can get to work is still several miles away and I cant use it to get home because of how early it stops running. Train service recently improved to twice a week but still has limited stops.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Over half of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck. Between sky high rent/mortgage, student loans and medical bills, getting a new car is often unrealistic.

        • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The point of expensive fuel is to stop manufacturers from making gas guzzling monstrosities. If fuel was $2 a litre would you be looking for a tiny-penis truck or a more efficient car?

          Manufacturers follow the market

          I drive around a country the size of Texas in a 1.2 litre hatchback and have no issues with that

          • lightnegative@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fuel just went over $3 a litre here.

            Apparently the small dick energy of ute owners offsets the cost, they’ve never been more popular

          • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There already is a used market. Old evs with ranges between 75 and 100 miles can be had for less than $10k. For any homeowners already driving 2 cars, using one of these for daily commutes and local errands makes a lot of sense.

          • nostradiel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m sorry but I don’t want used ev. Battery will be degraded and buying new one is like buying a new cheap petrol car. If you don’t buy new one, you’ll have a shity range, which is already shity and heavily exaggerated by manufacturers, especially in high and low temps which are for example in Europe where I live almost 50% time of whole year. There is no infrastructure to charge ev cars and it’s decades away from being build, especially in my country.

            If evs should be reality it has to have range at least 600km in worst temp scenario while being able to charge fully in 15 mins tops.

            And even than I wouldn’t want it. I wanna have car which I can easily repair myself, without electrical shenanigans and bulshit like changing whole fcking light instead of just bulb, or having to ask to access software of my car, jeez…

            I don’t want my car to have displays instead of buttons. I don’t even understand how that can be legal, when you obviously don’t watch the road to adjust fcking air conditioning. Or that stupid hold the line function which has car in my work. You can’t even turn that shit off and it steers instead of you. When I overtake a cyclists it’s a living nightmare and not talking about state of roads which have like multiples lines over and the cars is fcked.

            I’m 29 and I don’t want to have over-electroniseid everything…

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Europe […] There is no infrastructure to charge ev cars and it’s decades away from being build, especially in my country.

              Which country is that?

              Just the other day I got a taxi trip in a Tesla, with a guy showing photos of how he’d gone from Spain to Ukraine with a bunch of other Tesla taxi drivers to bring back some refugees. That sounds like he could get a recharge, across most of Europe?

        • Nobsi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So much wrong with this one.
          But on the “i can’t afford” one. Yes, you might not be able to afford a new electric car. They are a luxury still and will probably stay that until we see enough teslas on the used market.
          But you also dont have to buy a new car. if you can not afford your car right now and doubling the gas prices will worsen that condition then something entirely different is wrong.

          Might be multiple things. Either you are American and you live in a nice-ish house in the suburbs: Your politicians and the car industry have failed you for a long time. I would say go vote but i doubt that even a fully dem senate and ruling party would change a lot.
          Might be that you don’t earn enough money at all. This one is a bad one, because it means your politicians have failed you deeply. Agin, voting might change it a bit to the better but if you cannot demand a bigger wage to fund your only way to get to work then you’re out of luck.

          Even if you could buy an electric now, it would not save you any money if you don’t or can’t change something else drastically.
          Drive less, earn more, move closer to work if that’s even possible.

    • namelessdread@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I get what you’re saying, but I’m not sure you realize just how much that would hurt people. Europe is much more densely concentrated and has far better public transit options. Many parts of the US are extremely rural. My nearest grocery store is a 30 minute drive away. There are no stores in walking distance at all. There are no sidewalks. There are no busses, trains, or cabs in my area, and that is not wildly uncommon.

      If costs of gas doubled, at least without viable alternatives, it would absolutely bankrupt people. And it would disproportionately impact poor people in rural areas where it’s very common to commute to work 30-60 minutes of driving is a common commute. While it varies by state, US federal minimum wage in the US is $7.25/hour. Many people commute for work, and an hour drive one way is also not uncommon.

      Let’s take 7.25 an hour x 40 hours = $290 before taxes.

      We’ll keep it simple and say a person uses only 1 gallon of gas per day to get to and from work which, at $8 a gallon x 5 days a week = $40. Just that travel to and from work and no other travel at all (or maintenance on the vehicle) would be 14% of pre-tax income.

      So many things need to change so I understand the perspective, but I think it’s really important to consider the widespread impact. Obviously the US has a lot of issues contributing to this situation.

    • KredeSeraf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope your country multiples in size to match the US and you can see what it’s like to have to drive long distances.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They do, it’s called the European Union and they have publicly-funded means of transportation through it. They can freely move through the borders of any nation in the Schengen Zone without need of a passport. You can travel through most of Europe by many different means besides automobiles.

        Our country is just too stubborn and individualistic to ever elect politicians that would see through the time and money required for the types of projects needed to make the US no longer reliant on cars and trucks. On top of that, it could take decades. Say if we ever did, it would just get shut down when the next conservative blow hard convinces enough people that it isn’t worth it.

        Long term projects like that just aren’t in the cards for the US any more.

        • KredeSeraf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, no shit. Not surprised no one here grasps concepts that aren’t spelled out in blinking neon but my comment wasn’t glorifying American waste. It was mocking their self-centered and needlessly dickish bs. But go off.

      • nostradiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have 3x higher average yearly salary than in the czech republic while having 2x lower price of gas/petrol. And we are considered developed country… You have nothing to complain about. Get yourself 1.2 litre hatchback like I have…

        I would ban every engine above 2l in citizen commute cars cause there is no need for more power.

    • TK420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because people think security and privacy are a joke, and it’s times like this where it shows.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hardware security is still overlooked a lot in the tech industry, hence there are a ton of hardware and mechanical stuff out there that are made “smarter” but still barely have any security controls. That’s why there’s the saying “The S in IoT stands for security”. Bluetooth in itself is not secure, and they probably have a very basic control where the pump is unlocked remotely via a bluetooth device.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I very distinctly remember early bluetooth amongst other interfaces explicitly discussed in college as an example of “enabling things to understand eachother, including things that shouldn’t.” It’s up to the developer to protect their data.

        There is a problem here that isn’t just a hardware/software issue, it’s a “I’m not gonna worry about it” problem that leads to security issues.