Now is a good time to flood Wikipedia with donations. For the first time in my life, i have just donated to them and will do so again. You can do it too for a minimum of €2, no requirement for recurring donations or any nonsense.

        • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why? They’re either born with the money or make the money, but either way the money has turned them into terrible people.

          • Maven (famous)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d argue that you have to be horrible already to have loads of money. Any reasonably good person would be using their excess wealth for a good cause rather than building ego rockets.

            • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Money = power, and power corrupts. I’m sure there are some people who are horrible before they become wealthy, but I think money (and power) has a way of blunting peoples’ empathy.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’d be willing to take part in an experiment to confirm this hypothesis. I’ll wait for delivery, each day until 3.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Assholes are assholes, and Elon is just an asshole with money.

        Compare this man child to a billionaire like Yvon Chouinard, founder of the company Patagonia, and you’ll understand that money doesn’t change good people.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Downvote Musk spam.

    The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring him and his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle. Don’t be a useful idiot.

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    wikipedia foundation’s financials are solid, stable, and healthy.

    how’s twitter doing lately, elon?

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He doesn’t need to pay. Twitter is already worth less than the debt, if he continues to break that company apart there’ll he no reason to even consider paying the debt off.

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The debt is a tax writeoff. The entire company is a tax writeoff for him and his clique.

        This will allow them to gain billions more without spending a cent in taxes.

      • stevehobbes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not how debt works, he almost certainly pledged assets and a personal guarantee against it. This is known as collateral.

        The banks take the collateral when you stop paying.

        • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The way I understood it is that he didn’t get a loan to buy the company, but had a bank itself buy Twitter as a loan, so Twitter itself is the collateral. That’s what I did when I bought my apartment: a bank bought it from the constructor and let me live in it while slowly buying it from them over hundreds of installments. If I stopped paying the bank would kick me out and sell the apartment to someone else.

          • stevehobbes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That isn’t quite right. If you stopped paying the bank would kick you out and sell the apartment to someone else, but if they get less than you owe them for it, they will also send you a bill for the remainder.

            And then sue you to get that money.

            Interestingly, if they get more than you owe them for it, they will cut you a check for the difference.

            But you are actually wrong about how and what the order of operations is.

            You are buying the house, the lender (bank) writes the check directly to the seller, and you sign a mortgage agreement for that much with the bank and they put a lien on your house. The bank does not own the house, you do. The bank owns a promissory note from you, backed by your personal wealth and credit and the value of the house (that they have a lien on).

            In the case of Twitter, yes, Twitter itself is part of the collateral, but so was Elon musks personal wealth and Tesla shares.

  • rawn@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s trying to distract from the probe into Tesla’s range. It’s working.

  • Taco2112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So he’s offering that money to name it after himself?

    I’m not even clicking on that link, I never click on stuff with that turd’s name on the headline, just wanted to make the joke.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d actually take that in their shoes. That’s a lot of money, who cares if the English edition gets a silly name.

  • Teon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We already have Dickopedia elon, it’s called twitter and YOU paid $44 billion for it.
    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wikipedia is already rich enough, donate to the contributors instead

  • FRAnkly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Because israel controls wikipedia. Wake up sheeples. They say it clearly. Learn about hasbara. Google it hasbara influence on wikipedia.