• Wataba@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’d love to have a 32 hour week.

    It’s been a struggle lately to get even 16 hours of work a week lately.

    Turns out, problems are more complex than just what goes on in the US

  • m0darn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So I used to work in industrial automation, and I did see a factory owner buy a robot to automate a task because it was a brain meltingly simple task that was unpopular with his workers. The robot was slower, and more expensive than a human.

    It was taking a small piece of metal from a stack and putting it in a machine and pushing a button (not sure if he had a two-hand-no-tie-down set up) then taking the now bent piece of metal out of the machine and putting it on a stack. I think they had about 8 hours production per week of demand for the part.

    He didn’t do it out of the kindness of his heart but because he got tired of paying recruiters to find people willing to do it.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Worse, there’s actual practical evidence that a 4-day workweek for the same pay as the 5-day one still makes the company more money and the workers happier and healthier, but adoption is still glacial.

  • desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m so fucking done, it will take 4 years for us to get a 40 hour workweek and yeah that’s great but it’s a fucking joke

    Gracias Sheimbaum

    • Herculeskan @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here in Colombia it were like that and did it work. I think it’s because not terrorize the right hand

      • desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        yeah they gave us the same reasons here and I get it to certain extend. the same companies that have exploited us for decades were scared of this reduction and asked for this compromise.

        I’m still mad that the so called “left leaning” president bent to their claims but was not able to secure TWO free days a week

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    3 days ago

    I want more people to think though

    “If this tool makes me produce double, and I get paid the same, who’s keeping all that new value?”

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 days ago

      If your productivity doubles, they will lay off half the people, and all gains disappear upwards. It’s already happening.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      in the civilised world we just vote for people that support 4 day work weeks

      do catch up neo-commies

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Didn’t France throw an absolute shit fit over raising their retirement age. In then end, guess what, the retirement age was raised.

        Do catch up neo-liberals.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Does your region have laws that mandate no more than four days? If it was in my industry it’d just end up being four fifteen hour days. I worked 18 this last Sunday.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maintenance workers, the engineers who designed the machine, everyone above who keeps it running.

      Plants get shut down yearly for maintenance, stuff need to be lubed, replaced, upgraded etc.

      Those contractors are gonna be making 3x what you do. Sure they’re keeping some extra profit, but their expenses also go up proportionally too. Millwrites here make over $50 an hour, the company charges out at $100+ per man hour. Maintenance is friggen expensive on machines.

      All you need is 2-4 weeks off a year, and they save money while you’re off. Machines always cost money.

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        If that was true, if it was a wash to get the new tool for the owner, they wouldn’t do it. That’d be silly.

        Upgrading someone from pen and paper to a laptop with LibreOffice is probably going to dramatically (let’s say 4x) increase their productivity, without a corresponding 4x increase in maintenance cost.

        • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          3 days ago

          You know companies have whole branches deticated to computer support and cyper security, right?

          Or do you think that before laptops businesses had their own divisions of Quill-Certified Problem Solvers and Paper-Based Troubleshooting Engineers?

            • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              3 days ago

              No. I think the computer industry is more expensive and creates more jobs than all the paper and pen industries have trough the history.

                • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Hmm. What could industry producing millions of jobs world wide offer for working class. What a tough nut. You got me stumped. Maybe we should have just stayed using pen and paper.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          3 days ago

          Which is likely less than your full time rate, or it’s accounted for in total yearly “salary”. You’re paying for it somehow, even if it’s making a dollar less instead.

          And think more the lowly workers, the ones that only get 2 weeks, and that’s because they’re forced to by laws.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              34
              ·
              3 days ago

              They have their own issues, as described in my story in another comment.

              They made a company waste millions of dollars replacing a job, than forced them to remove the machine and reinstate the worker.

              They create problems where they are none, than celebrate when they win.

              You are also fooling yourself if you don’t think you’re not paying for that time off another way. Most people would rather have the higher hourly rate.

              • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                I like the time off. I like having the ability to plan a trip every year (near or far), and not having to worry about how my bills are going to get paid.

                Much better for my mental health than to work those weeks and not have anything to look forward to.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        the contractor getting over double is a bad deal for the worker unless they are providing significant infrastructure like complex expensive tools and vehicles and such.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    3 days ago


    This reminds me of this old productivity / salary chart that shows how fucked we are.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yup.

    Workers have to fight hard for every little thing, which is why it’s so sad to see us back pedal by electing born rich anti-worker dipshits into the highest offices in the land. We’re losing things that will take years and a lot of struggle to get back.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    What amazes me is how many people believe they will get universal basic income from the pedophile tech bro overlords who don’t pay taxes are actively gutting the meager safety net and worker protections we have. The cognitive dissonance is staggering

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s an argument that ubi will make you reliant on the state (which will be owned by private interest via the network state…)

      Basically. The elites recreate society through who gets meaningful work and who gets an ubi and has to dance on TikTok selling products to the other group who has the money to buy.

      Who gets meaningful work = the producers. Those who ship. The rest get to be beggars.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess I should say, those who own the means of production. Since it might seem like I believe the elites produce, which I don’t.

      • Formfiller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess that’s why they’re trying to buy up all the farms. We really all need to have a permaculture vegetable garden and backyard chickens, ducks or rabbits

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would worry more about what conditions come with that UBI. They can make you agree to anything.

      • Dr_Del_Fuego@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        They all seem to just be lies dangled over everyone’s heads to keep them working into the grave.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Even things like the 15 minute break.

      Companies will begrudgingly give you the bare minimum they’re mandated to, and pretend you’re only getting it out of their sheer appreciation and benevolence.

      Maddening.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve been salaried for just over 30 years consecutively. What are breaks? What is overtime? You’re speaking a foreign language to me.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Pshh. Yeah.

          I have no idea how they passed and we accepted this concept of “Salary means we own you and your thoughts and ideas, labor laws basically don’t apply, and you never actually stop working.” Absolutely deranged.

          It was probably pitched as such a great thing to employees, too, but I’ve always seen it as a scam.

          (No judgment on you personally, of course, if somehow this affords you a good life balance!)

          I’m also paycheck-to-paycheck with little in the way of advancement prospects unless one of my creative projects lands. So I’m not exactly writing as a sage of material success or anything 😂.

          I do appreciate what little time I have to my own autonomy though. Anything trying to take that from me gets met with stiff resistance.

  • RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Exactly. Productivity gains don’t magically turn into free time for workers unless people organize and demand it.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right and why would it? If you let people take advantage, they will. Doesnt matter what’s right. Doing what’s right gets you fucked in this world. Literally people distrust you if you try to do what’s right. It’s a lonely existence and that’s fucking sad.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      also the increase 30-40+hrs is design to exhaust people so they are to tired to protest for reforms socially, financially and to keep people disengaged from politics/ and information.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    30 hour workweek should have been 40 or 50 years ago. 30 would be late. We should be moving down to 20 about now.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think you mean “we should be fighting hard for a 20 hour work week now, as hard as our ancestors fought for an 8 hour work day, and we should be willing to die for the cause, the way they died for theirs.”

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        It should not even take that much. A big issue was unions somewhere in the 80’s or even in the 70’s stopped looking to shorten hours in favor of increased wages with overtime. The membership were easily swayed by time and a half. This lead to the reversal of the 40 hour week. More than 40 became more normal than 40. Of course then over time they have gotten rid of access to time and a half and more defining of roles as exempt.