Getting a bot to spam out 12 posts in a minute is not the way to make me want to engage.

  • keefshape@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is there really any scenario where a normal user should NOT be rate limited on posts or comments to some degree? Say, no more than 3 posts per minute? No more than 10 replies?

      • Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is why Lemmy needs to keep tweaking it’s feed algorithm. I understand why many people rightly have a distaste of social media algorithm fuckery, but Lemmy doesn’t have some of the same bad incentives that an ad driven site like Reddit or twitter might have. A better algorithm will help Lemmy grow and surface interesting posts organically.

        The recent feed change to boost smaller communities in 0.19 is a good start, and not showing too many posts in a row from the same community will be another welcome change.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Those numbers seem high for a normal human being. 1 a minute is even high for quality content.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      But when anyone can run an instance, you can’t control it. Someone has an instance which allows them to make as many posts as they want, and then all that content is federated to connect servers

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Really though? You can implement the same limits for federated posts, and just drop the ones exceeding the rate limit. Who knows, might be frustrating for normal users that genuinely exceed the rate limits, because their stuff won’t be seen by everyone without any notice, but if they are sane it should be minimal.

        The notice might still be able to be implemented though. idk how federation works exactly, but when a federated post is sent/retrieved, you can also exchange that it has been rejected. The local server of the user can then inform the user that their content has been rejected by other servers.

        There are solutions for a lot of things, it just takes the time to think about & implement them, which is incredibly limited.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can think of a couple. For events like the NFL or some expo where you want a bunch of different topic discussion threads all at the same time. But even then, it would very limited.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is where I believe that other site did a decent job with their front page: they created filters that divided it into most popular, what’s trending, and what’s new. I like seeing posts from the variety of different communities, but I do not necessarily want to see every single post. Especially the ones from the same community, in succession. Having a way to only see the ones that are considered “popular” would be nice.

    • Schmidtster@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Lemmy has 3 different feeds with 8 different ways to sort them, atleast my viewer does…. What more do you want?

      Curating a feed is best left to yourself, not someone who can tweak the algorithm to avoid certain posts showing up since they have an agenda.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        They just said what they want. 😅 You can disagree with someone but no need to get high and mighty about it.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem here isn’t that Lemmy doesn’t have good enough ways to sort content; the problem is that it’s still small and doesn’t yet have enough content to sort.

    • ShustOne@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The word algorithm has a bad reputation here, and there is a lot of abuse in over tuning it, but Reddit does do a better job showing me things I want while showing me bits from other communities. Even though there are 8 sorting algorithms here none of them quite satisfy my want. Scaled is a little closer but gives too many posts from the same community.

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    I generally sort by everything:12 hour and feel that I get a pretty good and relatively ‘clean’ cross section of the content.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        As it should be.

        Users have the ability to block users, communities, and intances (which blocks posts from appearing in our feeds).

        This may be mildly infuriating, but it’s also easy to solve. OP even mentions the action that can stop this.

    • bort@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      when you subscribe to community with different sizes, the bigger ones will dominate your front page. That’s why I use “all” to get updates from populare communities, and “subscribe” for smaller communities, that only rarely reach all .