• BigGovernment@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    This is why it’s common in the black community to get a receipt whenever you buy anything. You can’t prove where you are at all times, but you can prove that you were at a particular time and place. Might save you from being railroaded for a crime you didn’t commit.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s ok, your phone tracks your location.

    So leave it at home when you go on that crime spree.

  • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I like all the suggestions in here about how to avoid getting caught for murder through your phone

    My tip for not getting caught would be: probably don’t murder someone in the first place unless they really really deserve it

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Just having your phone should do that.

      So, so many crimes are solved mainly through phone metadata

      • kerrypacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah they don’t advertise it much but phone warrants are pretty insane these days, they can track the shit out of you.

        • Kallioapina@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Or carry your phone in a faraday-pouch when you’re in a area where you dont wanna be known to be. You can make one yourself pretty easily. Just unbag to ping it in a plausible area.

  • frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yeah turns out, “sitting in my room alone playing video games,” isn’t much of an alibi. I should get some hobbies that involve people. Like…multi-player games.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is why there are so many Twitch streamers. They get nothing out of it except for a perfect alibi.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        completelynormalthingtodo but sometimes i think about the perfect alibi for a crime and how you could pre-record a livestream with an excuse like “today i’m playing a VR game so sorry chat if i don’t interact with you much this stream!” if you’re feeling brave at the end say a vague “thank you all for watching, and thank you so much for all the donations, if you want it read though next time donate when i can see the chat haha” and would you look at that, thousands of witnesses saw you livestreaming at home, twitch.tv itself will confirm the exact time you went “live”

        then all you’d have to do is get rid of the original file, best if you physically destroyed the disk it was on to prevent any chance of data recovery

        probably has some flaws but i did think of it in the shower so don’t use it to do crime

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Funny story, (Funny might not be the right word) there actually was a killer who murdered his girlfriend because she was pregnant and didn’t want an abortion.

        In order to cover for this, he found out exactly how long it’d take to get to her house and back, recorded him playing GTA for that long.

        He was found out because cameras on the street found him walking near her house, during the “live” event.

        There were also bugs in the stream where the message “Time to die” showed up (in the context of an “ad” for a James Bond film), which were just his little way of bragging about his crime, like he was the Riddler or something.

        He did too good a job with his timing, because the “glitch” happened pretty much exactly at the time of death.

        I’ve seen enough of these “Perfect Murder Fails” go wrong, and it’s usually people who think they’re more clever than they really are pretty much giving all the evidence to the police.

        I know of another where a film maker rented an old house, made it look like a stereotypical serial killer’s lair, filmed part of a low budget horror movie on it, and then killed a guy there.

        Lemme lay down some flash non-fiction written in first person to tell you how that went

        “See, it looks like a murder happened here, but the brilliant part is: It’s a set for a movie that I can prove I’ve been making! Meaning I can just not clean up after my own killing and hide in plain sight! Aaaaaand they’re testing the fake blood I used because it doesn’t look or smell anything like costume blood… And I left my manifesto cleverly disguised as my script in the car that they can now search because the blood tested positive for being real blood, meaning probable cause. I’ll just say it’s my own blood and I wanted it to be realistic! That can salvage this! Oh right tests like that also kinda tell you who’s blood it is, meaning they know it’s the victms… and my “script” describes the victim’s wounds so perfectly it can’t be coincidence… Wow, I’m fucked.”

        • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The story of the filmmaker is probably one of the funniest true crime stories I’ve ever heard. Obviously, the murder itself is incredibly tragic, because that shitstain just catfished some random guy and murdered him in cold blood purely to stroke his ego, but the story literally feels like a dark comedy.

          However, the dude thought he was basically Dexter and far more intelligent than he actually was. He wrote a fucking screenplay describing himself as this super genius sex machine, while documenting his crime in great detail and claiming it was just a coincidence the murder lined up almost identically. Then the way he tried to cover his tracks were so comically inept, it only made his guilt even more obvious.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            because that shitstain literally just catfished some random guy and murdered him in cold blood purely to stroke his ego, but the story literally feels like a dark comedy.

            It gets worse, that was actually the second victim. The first one got away and refused to report it fearing he would be judged as unmanly for not being able to fight back. If he had simply called the cops, the second guy didn’t need to die.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Shitty Pro Tips:

    Turn on Google Maps Location History and act like a “normie”. (You should probably do this for a few months to establish a good and lenthy history)

    Then when you want to do murder surprise deprivation of someone’s life, leave your phone at home and use a pre-recorded voice of you that would activate and use the Google/Siri assistant at the same time as when you do the deed.

    Voila, ez alibi!

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What’s far more likely to happen if you do that is that you get caught up in a dragnet and accused of a crime you haven’t committed because they know you were nearby and need a fall guy.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      17 hours ago

      To be fair, if you’re going to do something really illegal, you shouldn’t bring your phone with you anyway, or at least put it on airplane mode. Even without Google Maps, the cell towers will triangulate your approximate location and time, and it’s basically the first thing police pull if there’s a crime in an area.

      You’ll also probably need to make sure you conceal your face as you walk by a million ring doorbell cameras, because those will rat you out and disprove your alibi.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I wouldn’t even trust Airplane mode, it can and will still keep GPS active and potentially log it in a way that can be accessed later. You do not truely “own” any modern cellphone and you should not consider any single activity or communication that you do on it to be private or secure.

        • Irelephant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          When you turn them off, they’re not actually off. This way stuff like emergency calls and alarms can go through. I miss old phones where you could just pop off the battery.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Mm… haven’t read that but sounds right.

          I might be comfortable committing a crime if I had a time machine but barring that I’d just drive from the crime scene to the precinct.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I mean, I’d probably mess up so that why I don’t do crime. Doesn’t matter if its an “honorable” crime like robin hood stuff, I’d most likely just fuck up and lool like a fool, and the government will use my attempt as an excuse to increase surveillance and divert more tax dollars to cops.

        I’m just not that type of person, so don’t count on me for any revolutionary acts.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          My constant paranoia about getting in trouble for shit I didn’t do is why I don’t do crime.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Even better, my location history proves I regularly go on 5 hour drives in the middle of the night so it’s not at all out of character that I drove to the middle of the woods where the body was found at 3am

      wait that’s not a good thing is it

      what do you mean they found more bodies

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Now you gotta tell us where are you driving to at night. No I am not a fed, I just work in the sunglass store.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That’s one of the main points in the podcast Serial. It opens with a question like, “do you remember where you were on Tuesday at 4:45 five weeks ago?”

    The person accused of the crime was a highschool student on the 90s before smart phones. When they said they were at track practice after school, it then became “can you prove where you were?”

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Somewhat fortunately modern technology solved most of this. It’s just a matter of asking the right company to provide proof.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That actually played a part in it as well. Ultimately the kid was convicted because of cell phone location data. Part of the controversy was that an expert for the telephone company didn’t testify at the time that the data was inaccurate.

        • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Not saying it would have been different today, but at the time cellphones were so new, and not a lot of people had them, a jury just had to trust what they were told. The way it was presented in the podcast seemed as though it was a very new concept for all, and that they weren’t really told how wide of a net the cell phone data pulled in. It was all trusted at face value, resulting in the conviction.