• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Or even like modern wifi. I saw a vacuum with wifi capabilities. Do I really need to check my vacuum battery level from my phone?

    • VodkaSolution @feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I saw a Bluetooth toothbrush that send reports to your phone on how good you brushed your teeth, like wtf?!

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          There are a few that do that but feel gimmicky. It looks like the upper half of a dummy and throws vapor to wrinkle out the shirt.

          Yes, I’ve considered it in the past.

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Those things have been around forever and work very well. For domestic use it’s probably only worth it if you have a lot of shirts.

    • toofpic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, this is something that I actually used. I have a robo vacuum. I was preparing my home for some guests once, when I saw that the vacuum wasn’t charged fully (because it was mispositioned on its base). I put it to the right spot, let it charge for half an hour, started it and left to buy groceries.
      At the store, I checked the app where I have my apartment mapped by the vacuum that shows its route and cleaning progress. And I saw that with the current charge, it will have to go back, charge and continue. So I set it from “max” power to “normal”, to let it at least finish the job.
      It is a cool and useful thing

        • toofpic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ah, ok, then yes. If it’s just an indicator on the vacuum against “indicator in an app + register + give us all your data+ “buy vacuum 2.0” notifications”, then fuck them

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes? Maybe the battery was left uncharged, or used up, so you’re waiting to do more cleaning. Why shouldn’t you be able to check?

      I have an automation in my Home Assistant setup to notify me when batteries need to be replaced or charged. Currently it’s only for the smart devices in that deployment, but yes. I want my home automation to keep track of all batteries, so I can see status at a glance and be reminded if one needs attention

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      AI isn’t a product for consumers, its a product for investors. If somewhere down the line a consumer benefits in some way, that’s just a side effect.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Think about the ways that information tech has revolutionized our ability to do things. It’s allowed us to do math, produce and distribute news and entertainment, communicate with each other, make our voices heard, organize movements, and create and access pornography at rates and in ways that humanity could only have dreamed of only a few decades ago.

        Now consider that AI is first and foremost a technology predicated on reappropriating and stealing credit for another person’s legitimate creative work.

        Now imagine how much of humanity’s history has had that kind of exploitation at the forefront of its worst moments, and consider what might lie ahead with those kind of impulses being given the rocket fuel of advanced information technology.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is so spot on. I use AI all the time, but the hype and “we should AI all the things” is ridiculous.

    I blame it on bullshit jobs. Too many people have to come up with weekly nonsense busywork tasks just to justify themselves. Also the usual FOMO. “Guys, we can’t fall behind the competition on this!”

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yep. I have middle management above me gleefully cheering the fact that ChatGPT can write their reports for them now. Well guess what, it can write those reports for me, the actual person doing the real work, and you are now redundant.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        As a person with a useless boss who does almost nothing and (of course) gets paid more than me, I like this take! Let AI report on workers and watch productivity (and profits) soar!

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          As an architect whose job it is to persuade useless bosses to do things the right way or to prioritize their teams to, I love this idea. Let AI take over boss work. They would be so much easier to work with

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Like many people, I use it like we used to use Google. Because Google (and most other search engines) suck now, thanks to all the SEO spam out there. My job requires me to be a “jack of all trades” (I am a duct taper with a bullshit job in David Graeber parlance). I have to cover myriad technical things. I usually know the high level way to do things, but I frequently need help with the specifics (rusty on the syntax, etc), so I use the free ChatGPT for that kind of thing. it’s been extremely helpful. I was also the first person to bring it to the attention of my boss ages ago when it first came onto the scene.

        Rather predictably, my boss now acts like he discovered (borderline invented it) and is always nagging everyone to use it to get their work done faster.

        AI has already put some people out of work and will continue to be disruptive. There will be a lot more layoffs coming, is my guess. And it doesn’t really matter if the AI is good or not. If the C-Suite thinks they can save money and get rid of “lazy workers” they will absolutely 100% do it. We’ve seen over and over again how customer service and product quality hardly even matter any more.

        I appreciate your take on it: replace the useless middle manager whip-cracker types. Hopefully we see a lot of that…

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          My company did a big old round of AI layoffs and now it’s barely functional at all because it got rid of a bunch of people actually doing things and kept all of the loud idiots.

  • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I work for a fairly big IT company. They’re currently going nuts about how generative AI will change everything for us and have been for the last year or so. I’m yet to see it actually be used by anyone.

    I imagine the new Microsoft Office copilot integration will be used only slightly more than Clippy was back in the day.

    But hey, maybe I’m just an old man shouting at the AI powered cloud.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Copilot is often a brilliant autocomplete, that alone will save workers plenty of time if they learn to use it.

      I know that as a programmer, I spend a large percentage of my time simply transcribing correct syntax of whatever’s in my brain to the editor, and Copilot speeds that process up dramatically.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you blindly accept autocompletion suggestions then you deserve what you get. AIs aren’t gods.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          you don’t catch it

          That’s on you then. Copilot even very explicitly notes that the ai can be wrong, right in the chat. If you just blindly accept anything not confirmed by you, it’s not the tool’s fault.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I feel like the process of getting the code right is how I learn. If I just type vague garbage in and the AI tool fixes it up, I’m not really going to learn much.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Autocomplete doesn’t write algorithms for you, it writes syntax. (Unless the algorithm is trivial.) You could use your brain to learn just the important stuff and let the AI handle the minutiae.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          AI can help you learn by chiming in about things you didn’t know you didn’t know. I wanted to compare images to ones in a dataset, that may have been resized, and the solution the AI gave me involved blurring the images slightly before comparing them. I pointed out that this seemed wrong, because won’t slight differences in the files produce different hashes? But the response was that the algorithm being used was perceptual hashing, which only needs images to be approximately the same to produce the same hash, and the blurring was to make this work better. Since I know AI often makes shit up I of course did more research and tested that the code worked as described, but it did and was all true.

          If I hadn’t been using AI, I would have wasted a bunch of time trying to get the images pixel perfect identical to work with a naive hashing algorithm because I wasn’t aware of a better way to do it. Since I used AI, I learned more about what solutions are available, more quickly. I find that this happens pretty often; there’s actually a lot that it knows that I wasn’t aware of or had a false impression of. I can see how someone might use AI as a programming crutch and fail to pay attention or learn what the code does, but it can also be used in a way that helps you learn.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Where “learn” means “memorize arbitrary syntax that differs across languages”? Anyone trying to use copilot as a substitute for learning concepts is going to have a bad time.

      • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I use AI a lot as well as a SWE. The other day I used it to remove an old feature flag from our server graphs along with all now-deprecated code in one click. Unit tests still passed after, saved me like 1-2 hours of manual work.

        It’s good for boilerplate and refactors more than anything

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      A friend of mine works in marketing (think “websites for small companies”). They use an LLM to turn product descriptions into early draft advertising copy and then refine from there. Apparently that saves them some time.

      • llama@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 months ago

        It saves a ton of time. I’ve worked with clients before and I’ll put a lorem ipsum as a placeholder for text they’re supposed to provide. Then the client will send me a note saying there’s a mistake and the text needs to be in English. If the text is almost close enough to what the client wants, they might actually read it and send edits if you’re lucky.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’ve actually pushed products out with lorem ipsum on it because the client never provided us with copy. As you say they seem to think that the copy is in there, but just in some language they can’t understand. I don’t know how they can possibly think that since they’ve never sent any, but if they were bright they wouldn’t work in marketing.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m a developer with about 15 years of experience. I got into my company’s copilot beta program.

      Now maybe you are some magical programmer that knows everything and doesn’t need stack overflow, but for me it’s all but completely replaced it. Instead of hunting around for a general answer and then applying it to my code, I can ask very explicitly how to do that one thing in my code, and it will auto generate some code that is usually like 90% correct.

      Same thing when I’m adding a class that follows a typical pattern elsewhere in my code…well it will auto generate the entire class, again with like 90% of it being correct. (What I don’t understand is how often it makes up enum values, when it clearly has some context about the rest of my code) I’m often shocked as to how well it knew what I was about to do.

      I have an exception thats not quite clear to me? Well just paste it into the copilot chat and it gives a very good plain English explanation of what happened and generally a decent idea of where to look.

      And this is a technology in it’s infancy. It’s only been released for a little over a year, and it has definitely improved my productivity. Based on how I’ve found it useful, it will be especially good for junior devs.

      I know it’s in, especially on lemmy, to shit on AI, but I would highly recommend any dev get comfortable with it because it is going to change how things are done and it’s, even in its current form, a pretty useful tool.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s in to shit on AI because it’s ridiculously overhyped, and people naturally want to push back on that. Pretty much everyone agrees it’ll be useful, just not replace all the jobs useful.

        And a chunk of the jobs it will replace were on their way out the door anyway. There are already plenty of fast food places with kiosks to order, and they haven’t replaced any specific person, just a small function of one job.

        I expect it’ll be useful on the order of magnitude of Google Search, not revolutionary on the scale of the internet. And I think that’s a reasonable amount of credit.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      The problem with GenAI is the same as any system. Garbage in equals garbage out. Couple it with no tuning and it’s a disaster waiting to happen. Good GenAI can exist, but you need some serious data science and time to tune it. Right now that puts the cost outside of the “do it by hand” realm (and by quite a bit). LLMs are useful given that they’ve been trained on general human writing patterns, but for a company to be able to replace their functions with highly specific tasks they need to develop and push their own data sets and training which they don’t want to spend the money on.

    • VodkaSolution @feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d love a boosted Clippy powered by AI! It would have incredible animations while sitting there in corner doing nothing!

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m yet to see it actually be used by anyone.

      None of your programmers are using genAI to prototype, analyze errors or debug faster? Either they are seriously missing out or you’re not following.
      I think the “AI will revolutionize everything” hype is stupid, but I definitely get a lot of added productivity when coding with it, especially when discovering APIs. I do have to double-check, but overall I’m definitely faster than before. I think it’s good at reducing the mental load of starting a new task too, because you can ask for some ideas and pick what you like from it.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Mine aren’t. Because it has been mandated by the execs not to because there is a potential security risk in leaking our code to AI servers.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            There are company agreements to secure that, we are not using the public websites.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          My company has an agreement with a genAI provider so the data won’t be leaked, we have an internal website, it’s not the public one. We can also add our own data to the model to get results relevant to the company’s knowledge.

    • supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I was watching this morning’s WAN podcast (linustechtips) and they had an interview with Jim Keller talking mostly about AI.

      The portions about AI felt like he was living in an alternate universe, predicting AI will be used literally everywhere.

      My bullshit-o-meter hit the stars but comments on the video seem positive 🤔

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it massively depends on what your job is. I know quite a lot of people at work use AI to to draft out documents, it’s a good way to get started. I also suspect that quite a lot of documents are 100% AI since we have a lot of stuff that we write but no one ever reads, so what’s the point in putting effort in?

      I tried to use it to write some documentation for various processes at work but the AI doesn’t know about our processes and I couldn’t figure out a way to tell it about our processes and so it either missed steps or just made stuff up so for me it’s not really useful.

      So it works as long as you don’t need anything too custom. But then we have engineers that go out to businesses and presumably they don’t use AI for anything because there’s nothing it can do that would be useful for them.

      So right there in one business you have three groups of people, people who use AI a lot, people who’ve tried to use AI and don’t find it useful, and people who basically have no use for AI.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have one guy using AI to generate a status report by compiling all his report’ statuses!

      I’m hoping to be one of the people to benefit, if Security would approve AI. As a DevOps guy, I’m continually jumping among programming and scripting languages and it sometimes takes a bit to change context. If I’m still in Python mode, why shouldn’t I get a jump by AI translating to Java, or Groovy, or Go, or PowerShell, or whatever flavor of shell script? As the new JavaScript “expert” at my company, why can’t I continue avoiding Learning JavaScript?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use Bluetooth all the time for speakers and headsets, also the PlayStation 3 controller was Bluetooth, so would that not mean AI will be a top of the line tool in 2 years? I personally don’t use it for anything at the moment, but in 2003 Plantronics released Bluetooth headsets for corporate environments (IP phones usually still used to this day).

      Seems like more of a we aren’t sure where this tool is most useful yet, but it will be used by many people around us.

      • vatlark@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s very fair. I don’t like how unpredictable Bluetooth is when you have multiple peripherals and multiple hosts paired to eachother and all within range of eachother.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Having two pairs of AirBudz, one AirBudz pro, and an Anker speaker attached via BT to my phone and all of them function exactly when I want perfectly… Bluetooth works amazingly.

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Nope! The budz only produce audio when they’re in my ears or my partner’s. I can select to mirror audio to both of us at the same time when we’re exercising. The speaker only works when I turn it on, but it connects immediately every time. I suppose I forgot about my car, which works but has a delay cuz the infotainment system kinda sucks.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    8 months ago

    I remember seeing a DankPods video about a rice cooker with quote-unquote “AI rice” technology. Spoiler alert: there is no AI in there.

    So… it’s not even putting it in something where it’s not useful, it’s straight up false advertising.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s usually an entirely mechanical timer with a spool or a simple sensor that shuts the heating when the water is gone. No coding required.

        • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Imo, that’s coding, just analog LOL

          “If” Sensor reached temperature. -“then” Cut power.

          Disclaimer: I have ZERO coding knowledge of any kind.

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It depends. If there is a component that evaluates the sensor status through some form of runtime and then regulates the temperature based on that, you could call it coding (I don’t think this is ever done since it has no practical use). Else, it’s just system architecture.

            Of course, there is some overlap within those areas because they both rely on logic, but the latter would not be considered coding.

            If you study CS, you will most likely have a course that gives you a basic idea about system architecture and if you study engineering, you will probably have to code some small thing or at least have a course on the basics. So yeah, not entirely distinct.

      • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bluetooth rice should be blue and also should make your teeth blue (because blue tooth, get it?)

        I suck at comedy.

    • evranch@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’ve been claiming things like rice cookers had AI for decades, so at least this isn’t part of the current AI hype.

  • NoneYa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was in an auto parts store yesterday and saw that you can buy a can of that stuff to fix your AC and the damn can has Bluetooth capabilities. So no, we’re still not done putting Bluetooth where it doesn’t need to be.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      That sounds cool, I don’t have a smart home setup, but Bluetooth sounds kinda nice to me for changing the temperature on the thermostat in the house, car not so much. Now I do know many people who use Bluetooth to cast their phone calls to their hands free devices in cars, as well as to hook up those diagnostic tools and have the error codes go to your phone instead of buying a product that costs hundreds of dollars to have a screen you would only use for that one purpose.

      • NoneYa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh no, this was strictly for the can to refill your car’s air conditioner liquid…the name is drawing a blank for me what it’s called, exactly.

        I’ve seen some of these cans have a digital display on them which I guess this Bluetooth is supposed to replace. But it’s still so weird to me especially because these cans are generally disposable.

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This reminds me I’m into season 5 of Burn Notice and Sam said at one point, “I’m on Bluetooth if you need me”. It was a weird reminder that once upon a time people were paid to advertise just… Bluetooth, because that’s a brand name. These days it’s just everywhere.

    The product placements in that show are not exactly subtle. Excellent show though, I did not expect it to hold up so well.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        8 months ago

        Boomers learned what Bluetooth was because they started making AirPod-style single ear headsets for cell phones. Everyone called them “a Bluetooth”.

        So if you said “I’m on Bluetooth” it means you’d have your big clunky EarPod on, ready to answer a call at a moments notice.

        A former fucking spy wouldn’t be caught dead using early Bluetooth for sensitive conversations though (and probably not current BT either). Considering every other segment of that show is a “here’s a hack to show how fragile the house of cards of modern society is, and how spies just navigate through it with impunity”, it’s pretty funny they leaned into this one.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Well they use little bluetooth style earpieces all the time to talk to each other, but this one time he name-checks it very awkwardly. I think they just assume anybody listening would have to target their comms specifically, and most of the time they’re relying on obscurity. I don’t think it would make sense for most of their targets to listen out for every bluetooth dongle that enters the building or whatever.

          They also don’t have government resources so they have to make do with what they can get their hands on, which is a running theme. One of the times he’s working for the government they specifically call out that his earpiece is so deep in his ear canal there’s no way anybody will overhear what’s being said to him.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      You sure they didn’t mean it like “put it on a USB?” As in, they use the name of the connectivity technology to imply a single class of product that might use it?

    • thisNotMyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I am currently in season 6 and also laughed about that line. Still a good show (although the b-roll scenes are also often quite cringe these days)

  • kinsnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Or like the blockchain 5 years ago

    Or like VR 10 years ago

    Or like 3D 15 years ago

    It is the hot new thing that you have to use for the VCs to fund your company and for investors to buy your stocks, regardless of the actual utility. AI does seem to have at least more possibilities of usage than those technologies, but it also have an incredibly higher possibility of misuse that is being completely ignored by these companies

    • radiohead37@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      It was always clear that VR, 3D, blockchain were fads. But AI is already useful as is. The hype may not be as high in the future but AI is here to stay.

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            But that’s just because 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 is the year of the Linux desktop!

            • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              By the news I’m seeing about windows and its new features that is bloated and restricting its users. That day is not long before its the year of linux desktop.

              • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                the news I’m seeing about windows and its new features that is bloated and restricting its users.

                You sound like every Linux user for the last 30 years.

                … I use Arch btw

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Almost all my colleagues are using genAI every day, I don’t know anyone using VR regularly.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        I strongly disagree. 3D, VR and blockchain have limited use. They were just extremely overhyped. It’s the exact same now with AI. It has uses, yes, but you don’t need it in your toothbrush.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          But how will we provide an enhanced, metaverse 3D AR blockchain-backed cavity reduction without an LLM?

    • Fubber Nuckin'@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nobody used blockchain besides scam artists and money laundering schemes. VR was a super niche toy and was not shoved into anything. 3D was… Okay you have a point with that one, but AI can actually be pretty useful where it’s actually useful.

      Most people now use chat gpt to some extent voluntarily, without it being shoehorned into an otherwise unrelated product. My mom told me how she was using it to help her rewrite her resume just the other day. I agree that there’s a fad of it being forced into everything that doesn’t need it, but i think it’s here to stay.

      Also, agree to disagree on it having an “incredibly higher possibility of misuse”. It’s just a tool to let people do things they want to do, whether their intentions are good or not.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        In all honesty, it seems like they’ve been trying to make 3D happen every ten to fifteen years since the 1950s. And they tried making VR a thing in the 80s and 90s, too until it went to sleep for a little while.

          • everett@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I played one at… I want to say Wal-mart (or maybe K-mart?). The demo station was on display for maybe a year, but it was never working except for one glorious time I got to play… uh, something, I think either tennis or the Wario platformer. Clearly the game didn’t stick in my head, but the overall experience was amazing.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    Makes me feel a little better. In 2024 I Can’t get a “Windows ready” Bluetooth dongle to be recognized by my still supported Windows computer.

  • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    To be fair, we only know where Bluetooth is useful because we put it in a lot of places where it wasn’t useful

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Trial and error isn’t the only way to optimize things… It’s actually one of the worst, the one you use when you have no clue how to proceed

      So no, that is not a justification for having done it or continue to do it

      Now I wonder if substituting the sugar in my coffee with arsenic would render a delicious new beverage… Only one way to find out!

      • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not talking about trial and error, I’m talking about throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks.

        There might be good ideas out there that no one could think of until they accidentally get invented

        • exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not talking about trial and error, I’m talking about throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks.

          Is that not trial and error?

  • baatliwala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    That scene in Better Call Saul with the investment guy permanently on his BT earpiece was such a wave of nostalgia for me, used to see those everywhere in the 2000s with a little blue light on them flashing.

    • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Quite possibly. I don’t think I’ve ever had any Bluetooth device work without hiccups. My old earbuds used to disconnect or lose pairing all the time. A couple of game controllers I have only worked intermittently for years. My phone is always losing connection in our car. I’ve ironed out some of the problems, but I’ve never had Bluetooth just work for me.

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bluetooth with mobile devices I’d agree. But my work pc hates Bluetooth devices. Such as refusing to use the correct audio channel with headphones, so I still use wired headphones.

      I’ve always felt Windows could be temperament with Bluetooth, especially pre Windows 7. Like XP seemed to be a shitshow for Bluetooth.

      • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bluetooth audio has always been absolutely awful in windows as far as I recall. Bluetooth in general is super temperamental, I recall fighting with data loggers my first job out of uni that only connected via Bluetooth. Older ones were serial and were actually reliable.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve had bad results on Mac OSX as well.

          It’s partly a timing thing, and maybe that puts the issues in the apps. If I am using my headset, it also works in things like Teams and Slack. However audio doesn’t want to switch if I turn in the headset in the app. Even worse, if I turn the headset on right before launching a call. It’s better now that I turn in the headset, then do a slow count to ten before starting a call, but still not reliable

        • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Bluetooth reliability by OS

          Android > Ubuntu > iOS (because of the stupid automatic turn back on anti-feature) > Windows > Linux Lite (possibly due to 2009 hardware?)

          • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            For real Bluetooth is near flawless in Debian and Mint from my experience, mint is on a 2013 laptop too with no issues to modern speakers.

            Personally I prefer hard wire for audio where possible but it’s really convenient for a garage speaker and kitchen speaker

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I hate everything wireless when it comes to PC peripherals. They just randomly stop working or have a weird, noticeable lag. I have a 3 bucks WLAN adapter on my RPi that surprisingly works OK, but that’s it.

    • z00s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bluetooth is like the SpongeBob “repeating then saying something different” meme where you go through the whole annoying pairing process, then it plays through the PC speaker anyway

    • Bob@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bluetooth gives me the same sensation as a stove with faulty knobs. It’s like there’s a veil between me and the machine.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        LLM are grossly subsidized by piles of investment capital hoping to corner the market. It may ultimately be that the only profitable uses for these services are illicit